Nguyen, Phuong L.

Abstract Introduction Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are heterogeneous myeloid disorders characterized by dysplasia in one or more hematopoietic cell lines, peripheral cytopenia(s), and distinct cytogenetic abnormalities. The presence of certain cytogenetic abnormalities [e.g. 7/del(7q), -5/del(5q), 13/del(13q), i(17p)], in the setting of unexplained persistent cytopenia, has been considered presumptive evidence of MDS, despite definitive morphologic features of MDS. Conversely, chromosomal abnormalities such as isolated 20q- are not considered definitive evidence for MDS, in the absence of dysplasia. Based on our previous findings, patients with isolated 20q- without morphologic features of a myeloid neoplasm have varied clinical outcomes (Jawad MD et al. Am J Hematol.2016). In this study, we investigate the frequency of recurrent somatic gene mutations in these patients, and their relationship to progression to a myeloid neoplasm. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the bone marrow pathology reports of patients evaluated at our institution from 01/2005 to 09/2015 who had isolated 20q- in at least 2 of 20 metaphases. Patients with isolated 20q- and without myeloid neoplasms were included in the study, along with medical record review. A 35-gene next generation sequencing (NGS) panel (OncoHeme) targeting myeloid neoplasms was performed on available archived bone marrow aspirate pellets. Statistical analyses were performed using JMP Pro software version 13. Parametric (t-test) or nonparametric tests such as the Fisher-exact test, chi-square test, or Wilcoxon rank-sum test, were utilized as appropriate for test variables. Statistical significance was based on a 2-sided significance level of .05. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used for analyzing time to progression to myeloid neoplasms and progression-free survival (i.e. time to progression to myeloid neoplasms or death from any cause). Results Fifty-six (42 males, 14 females) patients with isolated 20q- were identified. The average percentage of 20q- was 38.5 % (±29.3). The median age was 68 years (range: 44-90) and the median hemoglobin (Hb), absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and platelet count (Plt) were 11.7 g/dL (range: 8.3-15.1), 2.7 x 10(9)/L (range: 0.6-9.4) and 138 x 10(9)/L (range: 16-392), respectively. The indications for bone marrow biopsies ranged from cytopenia (21), multiple myeloma (20), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (10), amyloidosis (2), CLL (2) and transplant donor evaluation (1). Twenty-three patients harbored pathogenic mutations (15 had one mutation, 1 had two mutations and 7 had three mutations). The identified pathogenic mutations included ASXL1 (8), TET2 (8), SRSF2(3),PHF6 (2), SF3B1 (2), CBL (2), U2AF1 (2), IDH1 (1), IDH2 (1), BCOR (1), JAK2 (1), PTPN11(1), TP53 (1) and RUNX1 (1). Nine patients (16.1%) progressed to myeloid neoplasms (5 MDS, 2 acute myeloid leukemia, 2 chronic myeloid neoplasm-not otherwise specified) at a median follow-up of 36.7 months (range: 1.9-57.4). Of these 9 patients, 5 had one mutation (BCOR, TET2, DNM3TA, CBL, IDH2), 1 had two mutations (SF3B1/CBL) and 3 had three mutations (ASXL1/IDH1/SRSF2,DNM3TA/PTPN11/TET2, PHF6/TET2/TET2). In contrast, only 29.8% of non-progressed cases showed at least 1 mutation. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated the presence of genetic mutations in patients with isolated 20q- carried significantly higher chance of progression to myeloid neoplasms (p<.05, Figure 1A and 1B). However, the number of genetic mutations was not predictive of progression in our relatively small study cohort (p=.66). There was no significant difference between those who did and did not progress with respect to age, gender, Hb, ANC, Plt, 20q- or mutational allele burden. Conclusions Most of the patients with isolated 20q- and without morphologic features of a myeloid neoplasm did not harbor myeloid neoplasm associated gene mutations and further did not develop a myeloid neoplasm during the course of our study. Among patients with pathogenic mutations, nearly one-third showed progression to a myeloid neoplasm. Of the clinical and laboratory variables, the presence of genetic mutation is a significant risk factor for progression to a myeloid neoplasm. This study revealed the underlying molecular heterogeneity of isolated 20q- in the absence of morphologic features of a myeloid neoplasm, and underscored the prognostication value of genetic mutation analysis in these cases. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous collection of clonal disorders of hematopoietic stem cells characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis, dysplasia, and risk of progression to secondary acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Despite the development of numerous prognostic scoring systems (MDS Comorbidity Index (MDS-CI),International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) and IPSS-R, updated WHO classifications, and WHO prognostic scoring system (WPSS)), little prospective data regarding the influence of these and other factors on patient outcomes is available. To better elucidate the features of early mortality in MDS we compare characteristics of patients dying within one year of MDS diagnosis with those surviving longer in our Adults in Minnesota with MDS (AIMMS) population based case-control study. The AIMMS study is a statewide prospective population-based case-control study (R01 CA142714) conducted by the University of Minnesota (UMN), Mayo Clinic, and the Minnesota Department of Health. Adults (age 20-85 years) with a new diagnosis of MDS between April 2010 and October 2014 were recruited through the Minnesota Cancer Surveillance System. Patients completed a comprehensive questionnaire to capture retrospective epidemiologic data. All cases went through central medical review including pathology review by two independent hematopathologists, cytogenetic analyses, and oncologist medical record review with assignment of IPSS, IPSS-R, WPSS 1.2 noting past medical history, exposures, and treatment history and response. Annual clinical review of all patient cases for four years after initial enrollment is ongoing in a batched, non-real time manner. Three hundred and ninety-nine patients with a confirmed diagnosis of MDS based on central review and one year of clinical follow-up review were included in the analysis. For the entire group, we observed early mortality in those with abnormal cytogenetics, three or greater cytogenetic abnormalities, treatment at a community medical center only (versus academic), and with 2-3 concurrent medical comorbidities (Table 1). Treatment with hypomethylating agents also correlated with early mortality but when adjusted for WPSS and IPSS-R, this association was no longer significant. To investigate varied impact of disease and patient characteristics within different groups of MDS patients, we did multivariable regression analysis within the following categories: High/Very High Risk IPSS-R; Very low/Low/Intermediate Risk IPSS-R; Treated Patients; Supportive Care Only Patients. In patients with high or very high risk IPSS-R, the presence of 3 or more cytogenetic abnormalities was the only significant predictor early mortality in a multivariable adjusted model (OR: 3.66, 95% CI: 1.57-8.53). Similarly, in those with very low, low, or intermediate IPSS-R, abnormal cytogenetics was the only significant predictor of early mortality in an adjusted model (OR: 3.71, 95% CI 1.49-9.26). In patients receiving supportive care only, early mortality was seen in those who had diabetes (OR: 3.06, 95% CI 1.11-8.42), had complex cytogenetics (OR for ≥ 3 abnormalities: 4.94, 95% CI 1.25-19.46), and had very high or high IPSS-R (OR: 4.20, 95% CI 1.43-12.34). Likewise, complex cytogenetics remained the sole significant predictor of early mortality in treated patients (OR: 4.84, 95% CI 1.43-16.37). Complex cytogenetics and prognostic risk category (either by WPSS or IPSS-R) have previously been associated with higher risk disease and early mortality without intervention. Our data confirm this association in a large prospectively followed MDS cohort and highlight the significance of cytogenetic abnormalities and complexity regardless of IPSS-R risk categorization or treatment. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Introduction: The revised international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-R) for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is widely accepted and has been validated in multiple studies. Patients with adverse cytogenetics do poorly and that is reflected in this scoring system by having the highest score for cytogenetics; 2 for intermediate, 3 for poor and 4 for very poor. Little is known about the effect of marrow blasts in adverse cytogenetic in the high-grade MDS defined by IPSS-R intermediate (>3), high (>4.5) and very high (>5). The goal is to examine the effect of marrow blast percentage on outcome in patients with adverse cytogenetics that is present in the high-grade MDS. Methods: We performed data collection from the Mayo clinic records for patients with confirmed MDS after obtaining appropriate IRB approval. Patients were divided based on their total IPSS-R score and we extracted high-grade MDS cases with intermediate, high and very-high IPSS-R only. Cytogenetics and baseline CBC were available for analysis. We calculated the survival difference in patients with blasts <5% and patient with blasts of 5% to 19% for every group. Survival estimates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank testing using JMP v.13. Results: Our database had 1300 patients with confirmed MDS, 41% (N=536) are high-grade MDS. From those, the median age was 70 and 70% were males. Median bone marrow blast was 6% (0-19). Baseline hemoglobin is 9.2 g/dL, WBC 2.7, ANC 1.05, and platelets 69. Their cytogenetics were 1% very good, 31% good, 23% intermediate, 16% poor and 29% very poor. The total IPSS-R groups were 39%,31%, and 30% for the intermediate, high, and very-high groups respectively. The overall survival (OS) for the high-grade MDS with marrow blast <5% was 12.3 months and for patients with marrow blasts ≥5% 11.4 months (P=.4). At each high-grade MDS; intermediate, high and very high, there were no statistically significant differences for patients with marrow blasts below or above 5%. In term of risk of progression to AML, patients with blasts ≥5% were at higher risk of progression compared with <5% (25% vs 10% , P<.001), with no statistically significant difference in term of time-to-AML progression. Conclusion: The percentages of bone marrow blasts had no impact on overall survival among patients with high grade MDS. However, patients with ≥5% marrow blasts are at a higher risk for progression to AML. Disclosures Al-Kali: Novartis: Research Funding.

Abstract Introduction Expanding treatment options for MDS have changed therapeutic decision-making for clinicians. To better characterize therapeutic choices in newly diagnosed MDS, we report the practice patterns captured during the first year of MDS diagnosis for patients enrolled in our statewide population-based study. We highlight a comparison of treatment in community and academic centers. Methods Adults in Minnesota with MDS (AIMMS) is a statewide prospective population-based study conducted by the University of Minnesota (UMN), Mayo Clinic, and Minnesota Department of Health. Starting in April 2010, all newly diagnosed adult cases (ages 20+) of MDS were invited to participate. After patient enrollment, central review was performed consisting of independent hematopathology and cytogenetic review coupled with oncologist chart review assigning prognostic risk scores [International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) and IPSS-R (Revised)] and abstracting treatment exposures. All enrolled patients with one year follow-up were included in this analysis. Treatment was divided into supportive, active, transplant, or other. Supportive care included observation, growth factors, and transfusions. Active care included azacitidine, decitabine, lenalidomide, or 7+3 chemotherapy. Academic centers were defined as the UMN and Mayo Clinic; all other centers were designated as community based practices. Results The median patient age was 73 years, with 68% males. IPSS and IPSS-R risk scores were calculated for 100% and 97% of patients, respectively. Treatment choices stratified by IPSS risk group showed 89% low risk, 53% INT-1, 31% INT-2, and 13% high risk with supportive care; active and transplant strategies were utilized for 9% low risk, 44% INT-1, 64% INT-2, and 88% high risk. INT-1 in the community received 70% supportive treatment, in academic 35%. Active treatment for INT-1 was 30% in community and 45% in academic. Community INT-2 received supportive care in 45% of cases, in academic 23%. Transplants were limited to academic centers, with the highest rate in INT-2 at 34%. Among community diagnoses, 100% of high risk, 52% INT-2, 26% INT-1, and 13% low risk were referred to an academic center. Comparison of age <65 and 65+ years showed 83% of transplants occurred in those <65. INT-2/high risk group patients <65 received 95% active therapy or transplant, compared to 51% of those 65+. Discussion This prospective, population based study provides a well-defined patient cohort based on central review of pathologic and clinical data. Evaluation of practice patterns during the first year after diagnosis showed higher utilization of active and transplant treatment strategies as IPSS risk score increased. Further, compared to community, higher utilization occurred for patients at academic centers, suggesting more aggressive treatment in these settings. Age was also a predictor of treatment choice. In addition, referral patterns followed IPSS score. Whether these treatment differences are driven by patient preference and/or translate into improved disease control and decreased mortality requires continued prospective analysis and will be detailed in future reports. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 1733 Introduction: Much remains to be elucidated regarding the etiology of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and why some cases progress to acute myeloid leukemia. Further, there are few data on how accurate case classification is within state cancer registries and the impact of the 2008 WHO MDS classification modifications on clinical practice. We are conducting a large population-based prospective study of MDS to investigate risk factors for initial disease as well as disease progression. Our study includes comprehensive central review of all cases. Initial findings are reported here. Methods: We began evaluation and follow-up of all newly diagnosed MDS cases in Minnesota between the ages of 20 and 85 years from April 1, 2010 onward. Our process includes rapid case identification by the Minnesota Cancer Surveillance System (MCSS), contact of individual patients after primary physician approval, and, for interested patients, participation in an extensive questionnaire with medical history review and optional saliva sample for DNA. In concert, all cases pass through central medical review including: 1) independent pathology report +/− slide review by two hematopathologists to confirm diagnosis and subclassification; 2) independent cytogenetic review by a cytogeneticist; and 3) medical chart review by an oncologist to identify pertinent clinical history and prospectively calculate the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) and WHO-based prognostic scoring system (WPSS) scores. Annual follow-up is planned to monitor for disease progression and outcome. In cases of unknown cytogenetics, IPSS calculations are not completed. In cases of unknown cytogenetics or diagnosis of MDS-U, not currently stratified in the WPSS, WPSS calculations are not completed. Results: We describe the first 67 patients enrolled on this study that have completed central review. The majority of patients were male (n=44) and the median age of the cohort at diagnosis was 71 (range 41–85). Table 1 Conclusion: Ours is the first large prospective population-based study of MDS that includes central pathology, cytogenetic, and clinical review of newly diagnosed patients with prospective calculation of IPSS and WPSS and plans for long term follow-up. This study is expected to enroll approximately 700 MDS cases over a five year period. While early in investigation, our initial review highlights the variability in distinct WHO diagnosis between initial cancer registry (i.e., MCSS) designation and designation after thorough central review of all appropriate diagnostic components. Our data suggest the robustness of the WHO RA, RARS, and RCMD classifications, the possible over-utilization of MDS-U classification, and highlight the under-representation of therapy-related MDS identification with registry designation. The impact of discordant diagnoses between MCSS and central review on therapeutic strategies is uncertain, but warrants continued evaluation and underscores the importance of complete central review in evaluation of MDS cases. Supported by NIH R01 CA142714. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 873 Each year in the United States, approximately 45,000 individuals are newly diagnosed with leukemia and 22,000 will die of the disease. Due to this poor survival, leukemia ranks fifth in person years of life lost among specific cancers. Little is known about causes, although exposure to solvents, radiation, pesticides and, to a modest extent, cigarette smoke has been implicated for some subtypes. The last comprehensive report of leukemia trends covered the period 1973–1998 [Xie Y et al, Cancer 2003]. Evaluation of recent leukemia incidence trends could provide important new etiologic insights. Using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program data, we analyzed leukemia incidence trends in U.S. adults (≥ 20 years of age) by age, leukemia subtype (acute myeloid (AML), acute lymphoid (ALL), chronic myeloid (CML), chronic lymphoid (CLL)) sex, race, and ethnicity for the period 1987–2007. Frequencies, age-adjusted incidence rates (IR, per million), and trends were calculated along with annual percent change (APC) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Joinpoint analyses were used to detect any significant directional changes in IRs over the period. Of 43,970 newly diagnosed cases identified, IRs increased with age and were consistently higher in males than females for all four subtypes. The highest IRs occurred for CLL (54.4), followed by AML (38.3), CML (20.6) and ALL (7.0). With regard to trends, IRs for CLL (APC -0.5; CI: -0.9, -0.1) and CML (APC -1.2; CI: -1.6, -0.8) declined over the time period; declines were observed in males and females, and by race and ethnicity. Male(M):Female(F) IR ratios remained relatively constant at approximately 2.0 and 1.7, respectively. For ALL, IRs decreased in males (APC -0.9; CI: -1.9, 0.2) but slightly increased in females (APC 0.4; CI: -1.0, 1.7), which was most notable in Hispanics (APC 4.0; CI: 1.2, 6.8). In contrast to CML and CLL, the overall M:F rate ratio for ALL decreased, although it did not reach statistical significance (p=0.08). For AML, IRs increased significantly for males (APC 1.0; CI: 0.3,1.6) and females (APC 1.7; CI: 0.7, 2.7) from 1987–2000 and 1987–2001, respectively. However, since then, AML IRs for males have been significantly decreasing by 4.2% per year (CI: -6.4, -2.1), while IRs for females have been decreasing by 1.6% per year (CI: -4.1, 0.9). Across the entire time period 1987–2007, there was a statistically significant negative trend (p=0.002) in the M:F IR ratio for AML. Decreasing IRs across many leukemias since 1987 are unlikely to reflect changes in screening or diagnostic coding practices. Instead, these observations may reflect temporal changes in etiologically relevant environmental exposures. Of note, the prevalence of cigarette smoking in the population has decreased and occupational safety practices (e.g., reducing solvent/radiation/pesticide exposure) have improved over the last several decades, which could contribute to the gradual decreases in some IRs observed. In contrast, the rapid and significant decrease noted for AML since 2000, especially following a significant increase, was striking and deserved additional scrutiny. We further consulted with our cancer registry colleagues to determine whether the introduction of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) as a new malignancy in SEER in 2001 could be influencing recent AML trends given the (apparently) coincidental overlap in time periods. Of note, approximately one third of MDS patients subsequently develop AML. We learned that AML following an MDS diagnosis from 2001–2009 was not reportable to SEER and therefore not counted. We are not aware that this has been documented in the literature. However, beginning for 2010 diagnoses, SEER changed this practice such that AML following MDS will be captured as a second malignancy. Based on these changes in AML surveillance, it will especially be important to monitor future trends for this malignancy. Overall, this study demonstrates the value of in-depth analyses of SEER cancer IRs and trends; analyses may reveal patterns of clinical and/or etiological importance, or, in the instance of AML, unpublished coding rule changes. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background: The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms has specifically categorized germline mutations that are associated with myeloid clonal evolution (Arber et al. Blood 2016). This group consists of myeloid neoplasms with an isolated germline predisposition (CEBPA, DDX41), myeloid neoplasms associated with congenital thrombocytopenia (ETV6, RUNX1, ANKRD26) and germline myeloid neoplasms with multi-organ dysfunction (GATA2, chromosomal breakage disorders, telomere biology disorders etc). We carried out this study to describe the clinical spectrum of germline disorders with predisposition to myeloid neoplasms as categorized by the 2016 WHO classification revision. Methods: After Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, the adult and pediatric bone marrow failure syndrome database (1990-2016) and the electronic medical record were queried for germline disorders involving GATA2, CEBPA, DDX41, ETV6, RUNX1, ANKRD26, Down syndrome and Noonan syndrome. Chromosomal breakage assays (Diepoxybutane/Mitomycin-C), flow-fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) for telomere length assessment, Fanconi anemia complementation assays and Sanger/Next Generation sequencing (NGS) for the aforementioned germline disorders with myeloid predisposition were carried out in Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-certified laboratories. These disorders were then classified based on the 2016 WHO classification revision. Results : 54 individuals (37 families) were included in the study. Eleven (20%) patients belonging to 5 families were identified as having germline mutations with a preexisting platelet disorder: ETV6 (n=1), ANKRD26 (n=5), RUNX1 (n=5). Forty-three (79%) patients (32 families) had inherited syndromes with multi-organ dysfunction: GATA2 (n=11, 26%), bone marrow failure syndromes (n=14, 33%) and telomere biology disorder (n=14, 33%). There was one patient with neurofibromatosis with a germline PTPN11 mutation who developed juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia, while there were three patients with Down syndrome; 2 with transient abnormal myelopoiesis and one who developed acute megakaryocytic leukemia. The clinical phenotype, prevalence and characteristics of myeloid clonal evolution and outcomes are presented in Table 1. No patients with germline CEBPA or DDX41 mutations were identified. Patients with germline platelet disorders did not have any prominent non-hematological manifestations. Erythrocytosis (20%) with long-standing thrombocytopenia (100%) was a unique feature associated with ANKRD26 mutations. Non-hematologic clues such as human papillomavirus (HPV)-driven warts, primary lymphedema (Emberger syndrome) and frequent atypical infections with monocytopenia were seen in patients with germline GATA2 mutations, and preceded myeloid clonal evolution (morphologic, cytogenetic and molecular). Notably, the age at presentation and penetrance of myeloid transformation was variable, with individuals from the same family developing symptoms during the first decade of life and others remaining asymptomatic to date (fifth decade). Somatic ASXL1 mutations were detected in all 3 (100%) patients with GATA2 mutations and in one patient with ANKRD26 mutation that developed myeloid clonal evolution. In our study myeloid clonal evolution was seen in 40% with RUNX1 mutations, 27% with GATA2 mutations, and 20% with ANKRD26 mutations. We could not calculate the same for bone marrow failure syndromes as the total number of cases seen are still being assessed. Outcomes with allogeneic stem cell transplantation were favorable in appropriately selected patients (Table 1). Conclusion : The 2016 WHO revision to the classification of myeloid neoplasms highlights the importance of recognition and molecular characterization of germline mutations (syndromic and non-syndromic) with risk for myeloid clonal evolution. While some of these disorders (GATA2, Fanconi anemia, telomere biology disorders) may have important non-hematological clues, many present with isolated thrombocytopenia (RUNX1, ETV6). The age and frequency of myeloid evolution is highly variable. Acquisition of somatic ASXL1 mutations at the time of clonal myeloid transformation highlights the role of epigenetic dysregulation in disease evolution. Disclosures Kenderian: Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.

Abstract Background MDS is a clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorder characterized by dysplastic changes in the bone marrow, ineffective hematopoiesis and an increased risk for developing acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The majority of MDS cases are sporadic, but rare familial cases have been described and are often ascertained through clinic-based referrals. To our knowledge, no population based study of MDS has examined the frequency of family history of hematologic malignancies and disorders in patients, nor associations with disease characteristics and outcomes. Methods Newly diagnosed MDS cases are being identified by rapid case ascertainment by the Minnesota Cancer Surveillance System (MCSS), a population-based cancer registry in Minnesota. Eligibility criteria include all newly diagnosed cases of MDS during the period April 1, 2010-October 31, 2014, between 20-85 years, Minnesota resident, and ability to understand English or Spanish. Proxy interviews are not being conducted. Medical records and biologic samples are obtained and questionnaires are filled out by participants. Centralized pathology and cytogenetics review confirm diagnosis and classify by subtype and risk score including the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R). Since 2010, information on family history has been obtained through questionnaire responses and/or medical record review on 353 MDS patients. Cases were considered to have a positive family history if they reported a first degree relative with MDS, leukemia, lymphoma or other hematologic condition (multiple myeloma [n=4], Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia [n=1] and idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura [n=1]). Treatment related MDS cases were excluded leaving 330 MDS patients for analysis. Unconditional logistic regression was used to calculate crude odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) overall and by sex. Results A total of 61/330 (18.5%) cases reported a family history of a hematologic condition. The mean age at diagnosis was 71.3 years in those with a family history compared to 72.2 years in those without a family history (p=0.53). There was no difference in the sex distribution between the two groups. Though not statistically significant, the odds of having abnormal cytogenetics or an IPSS-R of High/Very High was lower for those having a positive family history (OR 0.57 [CI 0.25-1.33, p=0.19 and 0.67 [CI 0.24-1.84, p=0.29], respectively). The odds of survival at one year after diagnosis was significantly higher in those with a family history (OR 2.79 [CI 1.04-7.51, p=0.04]) compared to those without (Table). Further stratification by sex revealed that this association was strongest for males (OR=4.23, [CI 0.94-19.0, p=0.06] compared to females (OR=1.84 [CI=0.47-7.19, p=0.38]). Discussion In this population based study of adults with MDS, the prevalence of MDS cases having a positive family history was higher than previous reports. Additionally, cases reporting a family history of hematologic malignancies and disorders appear to experience lower risk disease and have significantly improved overall survival, especially males. It is possible that patients with a family history of hematologic conditions are diagnosed earlier in the course of their disease secondary to increased awareness about blood disorders and/or more active screening within the family. Our analysis is limited by relatively small numbers, but enrollment is ongoing so subsequent analyses with larger numbers of subjects may be more revealing. Additionally, a prospective study to examine these families further, including detailed medical histories and collection of biospecimens (saliva, blood, skin) for genetic analyses is underway in order to identify potential mechanisms and mutations involved in the development of MDS and progression to AML. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Introduction Much remains unknown regarding the etiology of MDS and why some cases progress to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). With MDS reportable as a distinct myeloid malignancy for the first time only in 2001, there are few data on state cancer registry case identification and classification accuracy. To grasp the true incidence and the scope of this heterogeneous clonal hematopoietic malignancy, the accuracy of such information is essential. In our third year of a large population-based prospective study of MDS to investigate risk factors for initial diagnosis and disease progression, we report our experience with MDS case identification and classification according to both our state cancer registry and our comprehensive central review process Methods We began our identification and follow-up of all newly diagnosed adult MDS cases in Minnesota in April 2010. Our process includes rapid case identification by the Minnesota Cancer Surveillance System (MCSS), contact of individual patients, and their participation in an extensive questionnaire and medical history review. In concert, all cases pass through central medical review including: 1) independent pathology review by two hematopathologists; 2) independent cytogenetic review by a cytogeneticist; 3) integrated central pathology-cytogenetic review; and 4) medical chart review by an oncologist to identify pertinent clinical history and treatments and prospectively calculate risk stratification scores (International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS)). Annual follow-up monitors for disease progression and outcome. Results We describe the first 161 patients enrolled who have completed central review. Our data highlight the excellent concordance between MCSS and central review for the MDS subtypes RAEB (n=40/50, 80%), RARS (n=20/23, 87%), and RCMD (n=19/25, 76%). However, we noted poor concordance for the MDS subtypes RA (n=1/7 (14%) with 5 cases re-classified as RCMD) and MDS-U (n=3/24(13%) with 21 cases re-classified into other MDS subtypes). Notably, our integrated central review process identified and reclassified 12 additional cases of t-MDS when all data were considered. Our central review process noted an additional 30 cases classified as MDS by MCSS that we deemed ineligible after central review due to insufficient morphology (n=20) or reclassification to chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) (n=5), MDS/MPD (n=3), or AML (n=4). Conclusion Ours is the first large prospective population-based study of MDS that includes central pathology, cytogenetic, and clinical review of newly diagnosed patients with prospective risk stratification calculation and long term follow-up. Our review highlights the variability in the diagnosis and subclassification of MDS between our state cancer registry and after integrated central review, with as many as 80% of cases in certain MDS subtypes being re-classified, and an approximately 20% ineligibility rate. The high proportion of cases submitted in MCSS as MDS-U that were re-classifiable into specific MDS subtypes following central review suggests a possible misapplication of this MDS category in a way not intended by the 2008 WHO guidelines. The additional classification of t-MDS by our central review process suggests that this subtype is likely underestimated by cancer registries. Assessment of therapeutic implications will be important to determine if these variabilities are consequential. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are rare hematological neoplasms that are more typically seen in elderly patients. Young patients (< 50 years old) have been reported to comprise between 3-6% in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) (Ma X et al, Cancer 2007; Rollison R et al, Blood 2008) with a better overall survival (OS). We hereby report the characteristics of young MDS patients with long survival follow-up. Methods: A total of 1012 MDS patients' data from Oct 1993 to Dec 2015 at Mayo Clinic were reviewed after appropriate IRB approval was obtained. All cases had their bone marrow slides reviewed at our institution. Patients youngers than 50 years old (yMDS) were included as cohort 1, while the rest was included as control group (cohort 2). Prognostic factors were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Survival estimates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves and univariate and multivariate analyses was based on log-rank testing using JMP software version 10. Results: Characteristics: We identified 68 (7%) yMDS patients with a median age of 42 years (range, 18-49). Female gender was more common in yMDS (43% vs 31%, p= 0.05). Upon comparison between cohort 1 and 2, only platelets were significantly lower in yMDS (61 vs 102, p <0.0001), but not white blood cells, hemoglobin or degree of marrow fibrosis. MDS subtyping according to World Health Organization 2016 showed single lineage dysplasia in 15% vs 2%, multilineage dysplasia 24% vs 36% , ring sideroblasts 9% vs 15%, isolated del (5q) 1% vs 3%, excess blasts 44% vs 31%, and unclassifiable in 6% vs 5%. As expected, therapy related MDS (t-MDS) was more frequent in yMDS (33% vs 17%, p= 0.005). Transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) was also more frequent in yMDS (28 % vs 11%, p= 0.0004). Compared to cohort 2, yMDS IPSS-R scores were very high, high, intermediate, low, and very low in 24% vs 13%, 29% vs 16%, 21% vs 20%, 19% vs 35%, and 7% vs 17%, respectively. Allogenic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) was more frequent in yMDS (42% vs 4%, p< 0.0001). Survival outcome: Median OS was longer for cohort 1 vs cohort 2 but did not reach statistical significance (43 vs 21 months, p= 0.1). Median progression free survival (PFS) was shorter for cohort 1 vs cohort 2 but did not reach statistical significance (8 vs 12 months, p= 0.3). Median OS for cohort 1 based on R-IPSS was 44, 105, 40, 18, and 12 months for very low, low, intermediate, high and high risk groups, respectively (p= 0.09). Median OS was shorter in t-MDS vs de novo MDS in cohort 1 (13 vs 47 months, p = 0.04). Young patients who had transformed to AML had a worse median OS (18 vs 93 months, p=0.001). On multivariate analysis neither t-MDS nor R-IPSS had a statistically significant impact on OS. Conclusions: MDS is rarely diagnosed under the age of 50. IPSS-R was less powerful in detecting differences between its risk groups for this patient population, although more than half of the patients with yMDS had either high or very high risk. Among this cohort of yMDS patients, there was a significantly higher proportion with therapy-related myeloid neoplasms compared to older patients (one third of patients), with subsequent higher rates of transformation to AML and higher allogeneic HCT. In our study, we did not find an improved OS for yMDS patients compared to older patients. Disclosures Al-Kali: Celgene: Research Funding; Onconova Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding.