Welsh, James S.

Abstract The Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging convened a task group to examine the evidence for the risk of carcinogenesis from low-dose radiation exposure and to assess evidence in the scientific literature related to the overall validity of the linear no-threshold (LNT) hypothesis and its applicability for use in risk assessment and radiation protection. In the low-dose and dose-rate region, the group concluded that the LNT hypothesis is invalid as it is not supported by the available scientific evidence and, instead, is actually refuted by published epidemiology and radiation biology. The task group concluded that the evidence does not support the use of LNT either for risk assessment or radiation protection in the low-dose and dose-rate region.

Prostate movement imposes limits on safe dose-escalation with external beam radiation therapy. If the precise daily location of the prostate is known, dose escalation becomes more feasible. We have developed an approach to dose escalation using a combination of prostate brachytherapy followed by external beam radiation therapy in which fiducial markers are placed along with 125 I seeds during transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy. These markers serve to verify daily prostate location during the subsequent external beam radiotherapy. Prior to implementing this approach, preliminary studies were performed to test visibility of the markers. Three different 125 I seed models, as well as gold and silver marker seeds were placed within tissue-equivalent phantoms. Images were obtained with conventional x-rays (75–85 kV) and 6 MV photons from a linear accelerator. All 125 I seed models were clearly visible on conventional x-rays but none were seen with 6 MV photons. The gold markers were visible with both energies. The silver markers were visible with conventional x-rays and 6 MV x-rays, but not as clearly as the gold seeds at 6 MV. Subsequently, conventional x-rays, CT scans, and 6 MV port films were obtained in 29 patients in whom fiducial gold marker seeds were implanted into the prostate during 125 I prostate brachytherapy. To address the possibility of “seed migration” within the prostate, CT scans were repeated 5 weeks apart in 14 patients and relative positions of the gold seeds were evaluated. The repeated CT scans showed no change in intraprostatic gold marker location, suggesting minimal migration. The gold seeds were visible with conventional x-rays, CT, and 6 MV port films in all patients. During the course of external beam radiation therapy, the gold markers were visible on routine 6 MV port films and were seen in different locations from film to film suggesting prostate motion. Mean daily displacement was 4–5 mm in the anterior-posterior, and 4–5 mm in superior-inferior dimensions. Left-right displacement appeared less, averaging 2–3 mm. We conclude that implantation of gold marker seeds during prostate brachytherapy represents an easily implemented and practical means of prostate localization during subsequent image-guided external beam radiotherapy. With such markers, conformality of the external beam component can be confidently improved without expensive new equipment.