Back to Authors

Gatenby, Piers

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1361-9940

Mayo Clinic

Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

Citations 1

Surgical treatments for esophageal cancers
Allum, William , Bonavina, Luigi , Cassivi, Stephen D. , Cuesta, Miguel A. , Dong, Zhao , Félix, V. , Figueredo, Edgar , Gatenby, Piers , Haverkamp, Leonie, Ibraev, Maksat A. , Krasna, Mark J., Lambert, René, Langer, Rupert , Lewis, Michael , Nason, Katie S., Parry, Kevin, Preston, Shaun R. , Schaheen, Lara, Tatum, Roger P. , Turkin, Igor N. , Horst, Sylvia van der , Peet, Donald L. van der , Sluis, P. C. van der, Wormald, Justin C.R. , Wu, Peter , Zonderhuis, Barbara M. , Ruurda, Jelle P. H. , Hillegersberg, Richard van , Wormald, Justin

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences | September 29, 2014 | Volume: 1325 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 242-268

10.1111/nyas.12533 Get It

The following, from the 12th OESO World Conference: Cancers of the Esophagus, includes commentaries on the role of the nurse in preparation of esophageal resection (ER); the management of patients who develop high‐grade dysplasia after having undergone Nissen fundoplication; the trajectory of care for the patient with esophageal cancer; the influence of the site of tumor in the choice of treatment; the best location for esophagogastrostomy; management of chylous leak after esophagectomy; the optimal approach to manage thoracic esophageal leak after esophagectomy; the choice for operational approach in surgery of cardioesophageal crossing; the advantages of robot esophagectomy; the place of open esophagectomy; the advantages of esophagectomy compared to definitive chemoradiotherapy; the pathologist report in the resected specimen; the best way to manage patients with unsuspected positive microscopic margin after ER; enhanced recovery after surgery for ER: expedited care protocols; and long‐term quality of life in patients following esophagectomy.