MacLaren, Robert E.

ABSTRACT The American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP) first described the role and history of the pharmacist as principal investigator (PI) in 2000. An update was published in 2010, citing evidence from NIH and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry that showed an increase in the number of individuals with a Pharm.D. degree engaging in pharmacist‐directed research. The 2025 ACCP Publications Committee was charged with providing an update to the 2010 paper. Key findings include a substantial increase in the total amount of federal funding awarded to schools of pharmacy (SoP) between 2011 and 2023, a modest increase in the number of pharmacists receiving federal grants when comparing 2010 with 2024, and evidence of pharmacist leadership and engagement in Clinical and Translational Science Award networks and service on national grant review panels. It remains challenging, however, to ascertain accurate and reliable data on pharmacists serving in PI roles because of the limitations of currently available data sources. This is especially true for pharmacist PIs who receive non‐federal funding. Future opportunities include a continued emphasis on training programs to prepare pharmacists for PI roles, greater institutional support (e.g., research infrastructure, mentoring programs) for pharmacists serving in PI roles, better promotion of research career tracks to Pharm.D. students and trainees, enhanced efforts at SoP to pursue institutional training grants, and more collaborative efforts across professional organizations to advocate for pharmacist‐scientists. An urgent call to action is necessary to ensure the future growth and success of pharmacist‐directed research.

Cellular therapies, such as stem cell–based treatments, have been widely researched and numerous products and treatments have been developed. Despite this, there has been relatively limited use of these technologies in the healthcare sector. This study sought to investigate the perceived barriers to this more widespread adoption. An anonymous online questionnaire was developed, based on the findings of a pilot study. This was distributed to an audience of clinicians, researchers and commercial experts in 13 countries. The results were analysed for all respondents, and also sub-grouped by geographical region, and by profession of respondents. The results of the study showed that the most significant barrier was manufacturing, with other factors such as efficacy, regulation and cost-effectiveness being identified by the different groups. This study further demonstrates the need for these important issues to be addressed during the development of cellular therapies to enable more widespread adoption of these treatments.

There has been a large increase in basic science activity in cell therapy and a growing portfolio of cell therapy trials. However, the number of industry products available for widespread clinical use does not match this magnitude of activity. We hypothesize that the paucity of engagement with the clinical community is a key contributor to the lack of commercially successful cell therapy products. To investigate this, we launched a pilot study to survey clinicians from five specialities and to determine what they believe to be the most significant barriers to cellular therapy clinical development and adoption. Our study shows that the main concerns among this group are cost-effectiveness, efficacy, reimbursement, and regulation. Addressing these concerns can best be achieved by ensuring that future clinical trials are conducted to adequately answer the questions of both regulators and the broader clinical community.