Back to Authors

Simon, Carl G.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5209-3577

Mayo Clinic

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Citations 2

Workshop on the characterization of fiber‐based scaffolds: Challenges, progress, and future directions
Garcia, Lexi, Francis, Michael P. , Yaszemski, Michael J. , Doshi, Jayesh , Simon, Carl G. , Robinson‐Zeigler, Rebecca , Simon, Carl G , Robinson-Zeigler, Rebecca , Soliman, Sherif M. , Doshi, Jayesh

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials | December 27, 2019 | Volume: 108 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 2063-2072

10.1002/jbm.b.34545 Get It

AbstractA critical component of many tissue‐engineered medical products (TEMPs) is the scaffold or biomaterial. The industry's understanding of scaffold properties and their influence on cell behavior has advanced, but our technical capability to reliably characterize scaffolds requires improvement, especially to enable large‐scale manufacturing. In response to the key findings from the 2013 ASTM International Workshop of Standards and Measurements for Tissue Engineering Scaffolds, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), ASTM International, BiofabUSA, and the Standards Coordinating Body (SCB) organized a workshop in 2018 titled, “Characterization of Fiber‐Based Scaffolds”. The goal was to convene a group of 40 key industry stakeholders to identify major roadblocks in measurements of fiber‐based scaffold properties. This report provides an overview of the findings from this collaborative workshop. The four major consensus findings were that (a) there is need for a documentary standard guide that would aid developers in the selection of test methods for characterizing fiber‐based scaffolds; (b) there is a need for a strategy to assess the quality of porosity and pore size measurements, which could potentially be ameliorated by the development of a reference material; (b) there are challenges with the lexicon used to describe and assess scaffolds; and (d) the vast array of product applications makes it challenging to identify consensus test methods. As a result of these findings, a working group was formed to develop an ASTM Standard Guide for Characterizing Fiber‐Based Constructs that will provide developers guidance on selecting measurements for characterizing fiber‐based scaffolds.
ASTM international workshop on standards and measurements for tissue engineering scaffolds
Simon, Carl G. , Yaszemski, Michael J. , Ratcliffe, Anthony , Tomlins, Paul, Luginbuehl, Reto , Tesk, John A., Simon, Carl G

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials | September 15, 2014 | Volume: 103 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 949-959

10.1002/jbm.b.33286 Get It

AbstractThe “Workshop on Standards & Measurements for Tissue Engineering Scaffolds” was held on May 21, 2013 in Indianapolis, IN, and was sponsored by the ASTM International (ASTM). The purpose of the workshop was to identify the highest priority items for future standards work for scaffolds used in the development and manufacture of tissue engineered medical products (TEMPs). Eighteen speakers and 78 attendees met to assess current scaffold standards and to prioritize needs for future standards. A key finding was that the ASTM TEMPs subcommittees (F04.41‐46) have many active “guide” documents for educational purposes, but few standard “test methods” or “practices.” Overwhelmingly, the most clearly identified need was standards for measuring the structure of scaffolds, followed by standards for biological characterization, including in vitro testing, animal models and cell‐material interactions. The third most pressing need was to develop standards for assessing the mechanical properties of scaffolds. Additional needs included standards for assessing scaffold degradation, clinical outcomes with scaffolds, effects of sterilization on scaffolds, scaffold composition, and drug release from scaffolds. Discussions highlighted the need for additional scaffold reference materials and the need to use them for measurement traceability. Workshop participants emphasized the need to promote the use of standards in scaffold fabrication, characterization, and commercialization. Finally, participants noted that standards would be more broadly accepted if their impact in the TEMPs community could be quantified. Many scaffold standard needs have been identified and focus is turning to generating these standards to support the use of scaffolds in TEMPs. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 103B: 949–959, 2015.