Graff‐Radford, Jonathan

AbstractBackgroundBrief self‐administered cognitive assessments deployed remotely and combined with plasma biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are well suited to assess clinical symptoms and underlying biology in large‐scale decentralized studies. We investigated whether associations of self‐administered cognitive measures and plasma biomarkers were comparable to associations of in‐person cognitive measures and plasma biomarkers.MethodParticipants included 327 adults from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (mean age = 70.8; 48% female; mean education = 16.0 years; 96.9% white). Most (94.5%) were cognitively unimpaired; 5.5% had consensus diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment. Participants completed Mayo Test Drive (MTD; Stricker et al., 2022), a remote, self‐administered, multi‐device compatible web‐based cognitive assessment comprised of the Stricker Learning Span (SLS) and Symbols test that are combined into a MTD composite. Participants also completed in‐person neuropsychological assessment (global‐z; Mayo Preclinical Alzheimer’s disease Cognitive Composite [Mayo‐PACC]) and fasting venipuncture. Plasma was assayed via HD‐X simoa platform for amyloid‐beta (Aβ)‐42 and Aβ‐40 to create an Aβ42/40 ratio, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and neurofilament light chain (NfL) using the N4PE Quanterix kit as well as phosphorylated‐tau protein 181 (p‐tau181). P‐tau181, GFAP, and NfL were log10‐transformed. Multiple regression analyses adjusting for age, sex, and education examined associations between plasma biomarkers and composite and subtest scores from remote and in‐person measures. Davidson‐Mackinnon J‐test compared R‐squared values of models with remote versus in‐person composites.ResultLower performances on MTD, global‐z, and Mayo‐PACC (Table 1) were associated with higher GFAP (p’s≤.02), NfL (p’s≤.003), and p‐tau181 (p’s = .04). For memory, worse SLS and AVLT sum of trials were associated with higher GFAP (p’s≤.01) and NfL (p’s≤.03). For processing speed/executive function, worse Symbols and Trails B were associated with higher p‐tau181 (p’s≤.02). Worse Trails B and Digit Symbol Coding were associated with higher NfL (p’s≤.02), and worse Digit Symbol Coding was associated with lower Aβ42/40 (p = 0.03; Table 2). A multivariable model with MTD explained significantly more variance (p = .04) for NfL (adjusted R‐squared = 0.461) than a multivariable model with Mayo‐PACC (adjusted R‐squared = 0.447); remote and in‐person composite measures were comparable for other associations (p’s>.05).ConclusionRemote and in‐person composite measures showed comparable associations with AD‐related plasma biomarkers, supporting MTD’s criterion validity.

AbstractBackgroundNeurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) measures from diffusion MRI provide information about tissue microstructure. Our goal was to compare the sensitivity of NODDI to structural MRI (sMRI) in capturing neurodegenerative changes in the gray matter due to aging and dementia.MethodWe included 815 participants [644 cognitively unimpaired (CU), 103 MCI, 68 AD] from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) and Mayo ADRC with sMRI and multi‐shell diffusion MRI. We assessed gray matter volumes scaled by head size and cortical thicknesses from sMRI and neurite density index (NDI) and isotropic volume fraction (ISOVF) from NODDI. Pairwise Spearman correlations were calculated between imaging measures and Tau‐PET SUVRs in Braak I‐II, III‐IV, and V‐VI regions of interest (ROI) in participants ≥ 60 years. Separate multivariable linear regression models were fit for the prediction of brain age using sMRI and NODDI in 515 CU participants. The predicted age gaps were calculated as chronological age minus predicted age in the remaining participants. We compared age gaps computed by sMRI and NODDI using disease surrogates (APOE4 genotype, AD pathologies via PET, WMH via FLAIR‐MRI, vascular risk, cognition via MMSE).ResultBraak ROIs, sMRI, and NODDI measures were correlated. The correlations between ISOVF and Tau‐PET SUVRs were stronger than correlations between NDI, volume, and thickness and Tau‐PET SUVR (Fig.1). MMSE was more associated with ISOVF than Tau‐PET and other imaging measures. The sMRI regression models had a higher mean absolute error (MAE) of 4.13 years than NODDI models with an MAE of 4.02 years. The NODDI model better predicted age gap separation between CU, MCI, and AD compared to the sMRI model (Fig.2). The NODDI predicted age gap showed stronger correlations with global amyloid‐PET SUVR, meta‐ROI Tau‐PET SUVR, CMC, APOE4, and MMSE (Fig. 3).ConclusionNODDI, especially ISOVF, had stronger correlations with MMSE and Tau‐PET SUVRs across all Braak ROIs. The brain age prediction model trained using NODDI was more sensitive in detecting neurodegeneration changes than sMRI based on associations with disease surrogates. Our work suggests that NODDI in gray matter may be a more sensitive surrogate of neurodegeneration compared to sMRI.

AbstractBackgroundKnowledge of the temporal evolution among plasma Alzheimer’s biomarkers and PET will inform disease pathophysiology and appropriate implementation of plasma biomarkers (Therneau, NeuroImage 2021; Betthauser, Brain 2022). This study investigates the relative timing of progression of plasma p‐tau181, p‐tau217, GFAP, and amyloid PET on individual and population levels.MethodWe included 957 participants from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging with clinical diagnoses of cognitively unimpaired (n = 732), MCI (n = 205), and Alzheimer’s clinical syndrome dementia (n = 20). An accelerated failure time (AFT) model was fit with amyloid (PiB) PET, plasma p‐tau217 (Meso Scale Discovery, Lilly), plasma p‐tau181, and GFAP (Simoa, Quanterix HD‐X) as quad‐variate endpoints, and sex, APOE genotype status, and education as covariates. The model output included a per subject adjustment or time‐shift for each biomarker indicating how much earlier or later it was estimated to progress relative to the average participant, the correlation (R) between adjustments for each pair of biomarkers, and the impact of covariates on each biomarker’s timing. Secondly, we estimated progression at a given age for selected cutpoints.ResultTemporal trajectories for each biomarker are shown in Figure 1. Individual‐level adjustments between plasma p‐tau217 and amyloid PET were highly correlated, R = 0.69(0.64‐0.74); how early or late an individual progressed on plasma p‐tau217 explained 48% of the variation in relative timing of amyloid PET progression. Associations of plasma p‐tau181 and GFAP with amyloid PET individual adjustments were moderate and low, respectively (Figure 2). Using the chosen cutpoints, the estimated order of biomarker progression was GFAP, amyloid PET, plasma p‐tau181, and plasma p‐tau217 (Figure 3).ConclusionOn the individual level, the strong association of the relative timing of progression of plasma p‐tau217 and amyloid PET supports that these processes are mechanistically related. The relatively lower associations of the timing of p‐tau181 and GFAP with amyloid PET likely reflect a lower biological association and greater measurement noise for p‐tau181. The individual adjustments, the primary output of this model, are independent of cutpoints. On the population level, relative timing of biomarker change is highly dependent on the cutpoints applied. This true for any analysis that employs cutpoints, regardless of the approach.

Abstract Background Brief self‐administered cognitive assessments deployed remotely and combined with plasma biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are well suited to assess clinical symptoms and underlying biology in large‐scale decentralized studies. We investigated whether associations of self‐administered cognitive measures and plasma biomarkers were comparable to associations of in‐person cognitive measures and plasma biomarkers. Method Participants included 327 adults from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (mean age = 70.8; 48% female; mean education = 16.0 years; 96.9% white). Most (94.5%) were cognitively unimpaired; 5.5% had consensus diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment. Participants completed Mayo Test Drive (MTD; Stricker et al., 2022), a remote, self‐administered, multi‐device compatible web‐based cognitive assessment comprised of the Stricker Learning Span (SLS) and Symbols test that are combined into a MTD composite. Participants also completed in‐person neuropsychological assessment (global‐z; Mayo Preclinical Alzheimer’s disease Cognitive Composite [Mayo‐PACC]) and fasting venipuncture. Plasma was assayed via HD‐X simoa platform for amyloid‐beta (Aß)‐42 and Aß‐40 to create an Aß42/40 ratio, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and neurofilament light chain (NfL) using the N4PE Quanterix kit as well as phosphorylated‐tau protein 181 (p‐tau181). P‐tau181, GFAP, and NfL were log10‐transformed. Multiple regression analyses adjusting for age, sex, and education examined associations between plasma biomarkers and composite and subtest scores from remote and in‐person measures. Davidson‐Mackinnon J‐test compared R‐squared values of models with remote versus in‐person composites. Result Lower performances on MTD, global‐z, and Mayo‐PACC (Table 1) were associated with higher GFAP (p’s = .02), NfL (p’s = .003), and p‐tau181 (p’s = .04). For memory, worse SLS and AVLT sum of trials were associated with higher GFAP (p’s = .01) and NfL (p’s = .03). For processing speed/executive function, worse Symbols and Trails B were associated with higher p‐tau181 (p’s = .02). Worse Trails B and Digit Symbol Coding were associated with higher NfL (p’s = .02), and worse Digit Symbol Coding was associated with lower Aß42/40 (p = 0.03; Table 2). A multivariable model with MTD explained significantly more variance (p = .04) for NfL (adjusted R‐squared = 0.461) than a multivariable model with Mayo‐PACC (adjusted R‐squared = 0.447); remote and in‐person composite measures were comparable for other associations (p’s>.05). Conclusion Remote and in‐person composite measures showed comparable associations with AD‐related plasma biomarkers, supporting MTD’s criterion validity.

AbstractBackgroundCo‐morbid Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology in the form of amyloid‐ß plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles are frequently observed in people with probable dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging (NODDI) is an emerging technique to characterize white matter (WM) tissue microstructure, although NODDI alterations and associations with AD biomarkers remain undefined in DLB. The objectives of this study are to compare NODDI and DTI parameters between DLB and controls and (ii) evaluate the pattern of DTI and NODDI changes associated with amyloid and tau deposition.MethodConsecutive patients within the DLB spectrum (n = 45), including probable DLB (n = 32) and probable Mild Cognitive Impairment with Lewy bodies (MCI‐LB) (n = 13) from the Mayo Clinic ADRC underwent multi‐shell diffusion MRI, [18F]‐Flortaucipir and [11C]‐PiB PET. A comparison group of 45 age‐ and gender‐matched clinically unimpaired controls (CU) was included. Voxelwise non‐parametric permutation models were used to determine pair‐wise group differences and assess the associations of AD biomarkers with fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), tissue‐weighted neurite density index (tNDI; NDI x (1 – Free water fraction)) and orientation dispersion index (ODI), controlling for age. Complementary analyses were performed using regions‐of‐interest (ROI) obtained from the JHU atlas.ResultCompared to CU, the DLB spectrum group exhibited widespread decreases in FA and tNDI and increases in MD and ODI, with the most pronounced effects in the cingulum bundles, uncinate, inferior and superior longitudinal fasciculi (Fig. 1). Greater [18F]‐Flortaucipir uptake was also associated with lower FA and tNDI, and higher MD and ODI in the DLB spectrum compared to CU, independently of age and [11C]‐PiB uptake (Fig. 2). In contrast, no associations were found between [11C]‐PiB uptake and any of the DTI or NODDI parameters. Complementary ROI analyses corroborated these findings.ConclusionWidespread loss of WM integrity was observed on DTI and NODDI in probable DLB and prodromal DLB. These findings were associated with greater cortical tau, but not with amyloid‐ß deposition. Although alpha‐synuclein pathology underlies the loss of WM integrity in DLB, amyloid‐independent tau pathology may also be an important influence on white matter integrity within the DLB spectrum.

AbstractBackgroundNeurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) measures from diffusion MRI provide information about tissue microstructure. Our goal was to compare the sensitivity of NODDI to structural MRI (sMRI) in capturing neurodegenerative changes in the gray matter due to aging and dementia.MethodWe included 815 participants [644 cognitively unimpaired (CU), 103 MCI, 68 AD] from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) and Mayo ADRC with sMRI and multi‐shell diffusion MRI. We assessed gray matter volumes scaled by head size and cortical thicknesses from sMRI and neurite density index (NDI) and isotropic volume fraction (ISOVF) from NODDI. Pairwise Spearman correlations were calculated between imaging measures and Tau‐PET SUVRs in Braak I‐II, III‐IV, and V‐VI regions of interest (ROI) in participants = 60 years. Separate multivariable linear regression models were fit for the prediction of brain age using sMRI and NODDI in 515 CU participants. The predicted age gaps were calculated as chronological age minus predicted age in the remaining participants. We compared age gaps computed by sMRI and NODDI using disease surrogates (APOE4 genotype, AD pathologies via PET, WMH via FLAIR‐MRI, vascular risk, cognition via MMSE).ResultBraak ROIs, sMRI, and NODDI measures were correlated. The correlations between ISOVF and Tau‐PET SUVRs were stronger than correlations between NDI, volume, and thickness and Tau‐PET SUVR (Fig.1). MMSE was more associated with ISOVF than Tau‐PET and other imaging measures. The sMRI regression models had a higher mean absolute error (MAE) of 4.13 years than NODDI models with an MAE of 4.02 years. The NODDI model better predicted age gap separation between CU, MCI, and AD compared to the sMRI model (Fig.2). The NODDI predicted age gap showed stronger correlations with global amyloid‐PET SUVR, meta‐ROI Tau‐PET SUVR, CMC, APOE4, and MMSE (Fig. 3).ConclusionNODDI, especially ISOVF, had stronger correlations with MMSE and Tau‐PET SUVRs across all Braak ROIs. The brain age prediction model trained using NODDI was more sensitive in detecting neurodegeneration changes than sMRI based on associations with disease surrogates. Our work suggests that NODDI in gray matter may be a more sensitive surrogate of neurodegeneration compared to sMRI.

AbstractIntroductionEmpathy relies on fronto‐cingular and temporal networks that are selectively vulnerable in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). This study modeled when in the disease process empathy changes begin, and how they progress.MethodsFour hundred thirty‐one individuals with asymptomatic genetic FTD (n = 114), genetic and sporadic bvFTD (n = 317), and 163 asymptomatic non‐carrier controls were enrolled. In sub‐samples, we investigated empathy measured by the informant‐based Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) at each disease stage and over time (n = 91), and its correspondence to underlying atrophy (n = 51).ResultsEmpathic concern (estimate = 4.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.79, 5.97; p < 0.001) and perspective taking (estimate = 5.64, 95% CI = 3.81, 7.48; p < 0.001) scores declined between the asymptomatic and very mild symptomatic stages regardless of pathogenic variant status. More rapid loss of empathy corresponded with subcortical atrophy.DiscussionLoss of empathy is an early and progressive symptom of bvFTD that is measurable by IRI informant ratings and can be used to monitor behavior in neuropsychiatry practice and treatment trials.

AbstractBackgroundAmyloidosis‐driven tau deposition has been a significant focus of imaging research in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, the 3R/4R tau seen in AD can be observed in the transentorhinal/entorhinal regions (Braak I/II) in the absence of amyloidosis. The underlying drivers of this phenomenon are not well understood. Our goal was to examine amyloid‐independent pathways of longitudinal Tau‐PET SUVR progression in the entorhinal cortex (ERC) using a broad range of risk and protective factors.MethodWe identified 449 participants from the population‐based sample of Mayo Clinic Study of Aging >50 years old with baseline amyloid PET and at least two serial tau PET scans (mean number of scans=2.3; mean follow‐up time=3.2 years). Using an amyloid SUVR cut‐point of 1.48, we categorized participants into A+ (n=167; mean age=77.5 years; 56% male; baseline ERC tau=1.20; 83% cognitively unimpaired) and A‐ (n=282; mean age=67.5; 56% male; baseline ERC tau=1.07; 92% cognitively unimpaired). We used an ERC tau SUVR cut‐point of 1.21 to determine T+. We fit mixed effects and growth curve models with age, sex, baseline amyloid, risk factors (midlife activities, sleep, stress, education/occupation, cardiovascular metabolic conditions) as predictors and longitudinal ERC tau as the outcome. We fit separate models in A‐, A+, and all participants.ResultsFor models of all participants and A+ participants, the only predictors of higher rates of ERC tau deposition were increasing age and amyloid SUVR (p<0.05). In the A‐ models (figure below), amyloid SUVR and age were predictors of baseline, but not longitudinal ERC tau. However, a greater number of cardiovascular metabolic conditions predicted a higher rate of ERC tau accumulation (0.007 (0.002), p<0.05). Only 13% of the 23 A‐T+ participants were APOE4 carriers (compared to 31% in the overall sample), suggesting the role of non‐APOE4 pathways to tau deposition.ConclusionOur results support previous evidence that significant amyloidosis is causal to higher rates of tau deposition. However, in those without significant amyloidosis, cardiovascular metabolic conditions predicted higher rates of ERC tau accumulation. Further work is warranted to investigate the mechanisms through which genetics, comorbidities, and lifestyle may play a role in early tau deposition.

AbstractBackgroundPosterior Cortical Atrophy (PCA) is one of the atypical Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) variants, characterized by predominant visuospatial and visuoperceptual deficits, with dorsal and ventral subtypes recognized clinically and radiographically. A third primary occipital (caudal) variant has been suggested. The objective of this study was to determine its demographics, clinical manifestations, and biomarker findings.MethodFifty‐two PCA patients with positive amyloid PET scans were investigated. Patients underwent neuropsychological assessment, 3T MRI imaging and FDG‐, amyloid‐ and tau‐PET scans. Regional FDG‐PET values were normalized to the pons and represented as z‐scores relative to a control population. Patients were divided into “primary occipital” and “other PCA” subgroups according to FDG‐PET defined criteria, with primary occipital defined as patients in which the z‐scores for occipital subregions were at least one standard deviation lower (i.e., more abnormal) than the z scores in all other brain regions. Global amyloid‐PET, temporoparietal FDG‐PET and temporal tau‐PET regions‐of‐interest (ROI) were calculated. Student’s T test and Fisher’s exact analyses were used to investigate differences in demographics, clinical findings, and imaging biomarkers across the two groups.ResultNine patients were classified as primary occipital; primary occipital patients were older (64.8±6.9 versus 59.3±6.8, p=0.034) and had more years of education (17.7±1.7 versus 15.1±2.6, p=0.007) compared to the other PCA patients. Clinical evaluation revealed worse performance for the primary occipital group on the Ishihara test for color perception (p<0.001), while the other PCA patients performed worse on the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) praxis scale (p=0.005). Overall neuropsychiatric symptom burden as defined by the NPI‐Q was lower in the primary occipital group (p<0.001). The FDG‐PET meta‐ROI (weighted median uptake in angular gyrus, posterior cingulate, and inferior temporal ROIs, normalized to the pons and vermis) was higher in the primary occipital subtype (p=0.006), but no differences were observed in amyloid and tau‐PET.ConclusionClinical and biomarker findings suggest primary occipital PCA is characterized by an older age at onset, more color perception dysfunction, less severe ideomotor apraxia and less hypometabolism in temporal‐parietal meta‐ROI compared to more established phenotypes.

AbstractBackgroundResting state functional connectivity (rsfMRI) studies have shown functional network disruptions in logopenic progressive aphasia (LPA) (reduced connectivity within the left temporal language network) and posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) (reduced connectivity within ventral visual network). However, little is known about how these networks compare and how connectivity differs within and between networks in these atypical Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) phenotypes.MethodFifty‐nine amyloid‐positive PCA patients and eighty‐five amyloid‐positive LPA patients were recruited by the Neurodegenerative Research Group at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, and underwent structural and resting state functional MRI. Spatially preprocessed data was analyzed using the CONN functional connectivity toolbox to explore the default mode network (DMN), salience, sensorimotor, left language, visual and memory networks, which were generated by averaging multiple regions‐of‐interest (ROI) within each network. The data was analyzed at both the voxel‐level and network‐level (ROI‐ROI).ResultVoxel‐level differences in functional connectivity between PCA and LPA were observed in all networks (p<0.05; cluster size, FWE=0.05). PCA showed reduced connectivity in the occipital lobe in visual and memory networks, parietal lobe in language and DMN, and sensorimotor strip in sensorimotor network, particularly on the right, compared to LPA. Conversely, LPA showed reduced connectivity in the frontal cortex in salience, memory, visual and sensorimotor networks, inferior parietal lobe in visual network, and anterior temporal pole and sensorimotor cortex in the language network, compared to PCA. Between network differences (p<0.05; cluster size, FDR=0.05) were observed between groups, with PCA showing reduced connectivity between the visual and sensorimotor networks, while LPA showed reduced connectivity between the language and sensorimotor networks. The DMN was anti‐correlated to the language network in PCA, while it was positively correlated to the language network in LPA. In both phenotypes, the DMN was anticorrelated with the salience network. The visual network in PCA showed connections to all networks, while in LPA, it was only connected to the salience, language and DMN.ConclusionThe atypical AD phenotypes were associated with multiple disruptions in connectivity, both within and between brain networks. Phenotype specific differences in connectivity patterns were noted in visual network for PCA and language network for LPA.