Domb, Benjamin G.

Purpose To report the minimum 2‐year outcomes of transtendinous repair of partial‐thickness undersurface tears of the abductor tendon using patient‐reported outcomes (PROs), visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and patient satisfaction scores. Methods All patients who underwent endoscopic transtendinous gluteus medius repair between October 2009 and May 2013 at 1 institution were prospectively evaluated. The exclusion criteria consisted of less than 2 years' follow‐up, previous hip surgery, inflammatory arthritis, open surgery, full‐thickness abductor tear, and Workers' Compensation patients. All patients underwent a documented preoperative physical examination with strength testing (scale of 0‐5) and observation of their gait. Patient satisfaction and PRO scores were recorded preoperatively; at 3 months postoperatively; and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years after surgery. The PRO scores collected were the modified Harris Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living Subscale, Hip Outcome Score–Sports‐Specific Subscale, Non‐arthritis Hip Score, and VAS score. Preoperative strength and gait were compared with latest follow‐up. Results There were 25 patients who fit our criteria. Significant improvement in PRO scores were shown for the modified Harris Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living Subscale, Hip Outcome Score–Sports‐Specific Subscale, Non‐arthritis Hip Score, and VAS score from 54.9 to 76.2, from 50.2 to 80.6, from 30.1 to 67.3, from 51.9 to 82.4, and from 7.1 to 2.7, respectively ( P < .001). Before surgery, 11 patients had objective weakness; 7 of these patients moved up at least 1 strength grade by final follow‐up. Preoperatively, 14 patients had a Trendelenburg gait; 12 of them had a normal gait at latest follow‐up ( P < .001). The average patient satisfaction rating was 7.5. There were no revision surgical procedures, and no complications were noted. Conclusions Partial‐thickness undersurface tears of the abductor can be treated successfully with endoscopic transtendinous repair preserving the intact attachment of the superficial fibers of the gluteus medius. We recommend this treatment for partial undersurface tears recalcitrant to nonoperative treatment because patients showed clinical benefit at greater than 2 years' follow‐up that exceeded substantial clinical benefit and the minimal clinically important difference. Level of Evidence Level IV, case series.

Background: Femoral retroversion has been noted as a possible risk factor for poor clinical results after hip arthroscopic surgery. Purpose: To compare the outcomes of the arthroscopic treatment of hip abnormalities in patients with femoral retroversion to patients with femoral anteversion between 10° and 20°. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Between November 2011 and September 2013, 790 hip arthroscopic procedures were performed at a single institution. Of these, 59 hips (7.5%) were located in patients with femoral version ≤0°, calculated using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. These patients were pair matched, based on body mass index ±5 kg/m 2 , age ±5 years, and Tönnis grade, with 59 patients with femoral anteversion between 10° and 20°. Exclusion criteria included Perthes disease, inflammatory arthritis, slipped capital femoral epiphysis, previous hip surgery, abductor repair, lateral center-edge angle <20°, Tönnis grade >1, and acetabular profunda or protrusio. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were recorded preoperatively, at 3 months postoperatively, and annually thereafter. The PROs utilized were the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), and Hip Outcome Score–Sports-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS). The visual analog scale (VAS) was collected to assess the patients’ pain; patient satisfaction scores (0-10) were also collected. Radiographs were collected at the above time intervals as well. Results: Two patients from the control group and 1 patient from the retroverted group required total hip arthroplasty at a mean 19.5 and 26.3 months, respectively. Both groups demonstrated significant improvement from their preoperative state in all PRO and VAS scores ( P < .001). No differences in preoperative, postoperative, or change in PRO and VAS scores between the groups were noted. Conclusion: Patients with femoral retroversion reported similar outcomes compared to patients with normal femoral version when undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery. Both groups had similar improvements from the preoperative state.

Background: The technique of hip arthroscopic surgery is advancing and becoming more commonly performed. However, most current reported results are limited to short-term follow-up, and therefore, the durability of the procedure is largely unknown. Purpose: To perform a multicenter analysis of mid-term clinical outcomes of arthroscopic hip labral repair and determine the risk factors for patient outcomes. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Prospectively collected data of primary hip arthroscopic labral repair performed at 4 high-volume centers between 2008 and 2011 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively with the visual analog scale (VAS), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and Hip Outcome Score–Sports-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS) at a minimum of 5 years’ follow-up. Factors including age, body mass index (BMI), Tönnis grade, and cartilage grade were analyzed in relation to outcome scores, and revision rates were determined. Failure was defined as subsequent ipsilateral hip surgery, including revision arthroscopic surgery and open hip surgery. Results: A total of 303 patients (101 male, 202 female) with a mean age of 32.0 years (range, 10.7-58.9 years) were followed for a mean of 5.7 years (range, 5.0-7.9 years). Patients achieved mean improvements in VAS of 3.5 points, mHHS of 20.1 points, and HOS-SSS of 29.3 points. Thirty-seven patients (12.2%) underwent revision arthroscopic surgery, and 12 (4.0%) underwent periacetabular osteotomy, resurfacing, or total hip arthroplasty during the study period. Patients with a BMI >30 kg/m 2 had a mean mHHS score 9.5 points lower and a mean HOS-SSS score 15.9 points lower than those with a BMI ≤30 kg/m 2 ( P < .01). Patients aged >35 years at surgery had a mean mHHS score 4.5 points lower and a HOS-SSS score 6.7 points lower than those aged ≤35 years ( P = .03). Patients with Tönnis grade 2 radiographs demonstrated a 12.5-point worse mHHS score ( P = .02) and a 23.0-point worse HOS-SSS score ( P < .01) when compared with patients with Tönnis grade 0. Conclusion: Patients demonstrated significant improvements in VAS, mHHS, and HOS-SSS scores after arthroscopic labral repair. However, those with Tönnis grade 2 changes preoperatively, BMI >30 kg/m 2 , and age >35 years at the time of surgery demonstrated significantly decreased mHHS and HOS-SSS scores at final follow-up.

Abstract This article presents the authors' technique for evaluation of possible abductor tears with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). By using T2 fat‐saturated coronal and axial slices of the hip and T1 coronal images of the pelvis, the authors show how to visualize all tears of the abductor tendons and signs of chronic abductor deficiency. After diagnosis has been made, signs that may help the surgeon determine if open or arthroscopic surgery would be best used are reviewed. Finally, the author reviews indications for a gluteus medius repair with concomitant gluteus maximus reconstruction. Technique Video video See video under supplementary data.

Abstract Excessive femoral anteversion may lead to increasing stress placed on the anterior acetabulum and soft tissues, which can predispose to intra‐articular hip pathology. By addressing the excessive femoral anteversion in combination with intra‐articular hip pathology, the results will be durable over time. This technique details how to perform a femoral derotation osteotomy for excessive femoral anteversion after addressing intra‐articular pathology with hip arthroscopy in one surgical intervention. This allows the surgeon to address both the underlying pathoanatomy and the resultant intra‐articular sequelae. Technique Video video See video under supplementary data.

Purpose To evaluate the minimum 2‐year postoperative clinical outcomes and the rate of return to sports in athletes who underwent capsular plication for the treatment of ligamentous laxity and/or borderline dysplasia during hip arthroscopy for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement and labral pathology. Methods Since 2008, data were prospectively collected on patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement and/or labral tears. Inclusion criteria were as follows: athlete at the high school, collegiate, or professional levels preoperatively, underwent capsular plication, and preoperatively recorded patient‐reported outcome scores including modified Harris hip score (mHHS), nonarthritic athletic hip score (NAHS), hip outcome score—sports‐specific subscale (HOS‐SSS), and visual analog scale (VAS). Exclusion criteria were as follows: <16 years old, preoperative Tönnis grade >1, and previous hip conditions. Sports activity and competitive levels were collected at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. Results Fifty‐one hips (49 patients) met the inclusion criteria, and 41 hips (39 patients) had minimum 2‐year follow‐up (80.4% follow‐up). Mean mHHS increased from 67.1 preoperatively to 83.5 ( P < .0001). Mean NAHS increased from 66.8 to 88.8 ( P < .0001). Mean HOS‐SSS improved from 46.8 to 80.1 ( P < .0001). Mean VAS decreased from 5.1 to 1.7 ( P < .0001). Thirty‐five (85.4%) hip arthroscopies allowed the patients to return to sports at follow‐up. Thirty‐four (82.9%) hip arthroscopies allowed the patients to maintain their competitive physical abilities at follow‐up. Conclusions Patient‐reported outcomes and VAS in athletes significantly improved at a minimum of 2 years after capsular plication as a part of hip arthroscopy addressing varying pathologies. In addition, most patients returned to sports at similar or higher competitive levels. These results suggest that capsular plication is a favorable treatment option in athletes with ligamentous laxity and/or borderline dysplasia. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Objectives: The most common reason for reoperation following arthroscopic hip surgery is conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to identify clinical and radiographic risk factors for early conversion to THA. Methods: Data were prospectively collected on all hip arthroscopy patients from January 2009 through December 2011. Inclusion criteria for the study group were patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for a labral tear who eventually converted to THA. Patients were then compared to a control group of patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for a labral tear and did not convert to THA during the same period. Exclusion criteria were patients with previous hip conditions such as Legg-Calves-Perthes, slipped capital femoral epiphysis, pigmented villonodular synovitis, and avascular necrosis. A bivariate analysis of 41 preoperative and intraoperative variables was performed. Results: A total of 792 patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 72 (9%) converted to THA. The control group consisted of 720 patients who did not convert to THA. Bivariate analysis demonstrated that the study group had significantly higher means or frequencies than the control group for the following variables: male gender, age at time of surgery, BMI, back pain, previous back surgery, Tönnis grade above 0, acetabular inclination angle, alpha angle, Seldes combined-type labral tear, labral tear size, chondral injury, traction time, labral debridement (versus repair), number of anchors used repair or reconstruction, and capsular release (versus repair). The study group had significantly lower means or frequencies than the control group for the following variables: preoperative patient reported outcome scores, crossover sign, lateral center edge angle, and psoas release. A statistically significant difference in average joint space was not observed. Conclusion: Multiple risk factors are possible preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for conversion to THA following hip arthroscopy. The clinician and patient should be aware of these variables.

Purpose To detail our early experience using concomitant hip arthroscopy and periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for the treatment of acetabular dysplasia. Methods We prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed the surgical and outcome data of 17 patients who underwent concomitant hip arthroscopy and PAO between October 2010 and July 2013. Preoperative and postoperative range of motion, outcome and pain scores, and radiographic data were collected. Intraoperative arthroscopic findings and postoperative complications were recorded. Results The group consisted of 3 male and 14 female patients with a mean follow‐up period of 2.4 years. Three patients had undergone previous surgery on the affected hip. Chondrolabral pathology was identified in all 17 patients. Twelve patients underwent labral repair, and five patients underwent partial labral debridement. No patient was converted to total hip arthroplasty or required revision surgery at short‐term follow‐up. All 4 patient‐reported outcome scores showed statistically significant changes from baseline to latest follow‐up ( P < .001). An excellent outcome was obtained in 82% of patients (13 of 16). The lateral center‐edge angle averaged 11° preoperatively and 29° postoperatively. The acetabular inclination averaged 18° preoperatively and 3° postoperatively. The anterior center‐edge angle averaged 7° preoperatively and 27° postoperatively. At most recent radiographic follow‐up, 1 patient had progression of arthritic changes but remained asymptomatic. No other patient showed any radiographic evidence of progression of arthritis. Complications included 3 superficial wound infections, 1 pulmonary embolism, and 1 temporary sciatic neurapraxia. Conclusions Our initial experience with concomitant hip arthroscopy and PAO has been favorable. We noted that all our patients have evidence of chondrolabral damage at the time of PAO when the joint is distracted and evaluated. All patients in this series had intra‐articular pathology treated arthroscopically and showed satisfactory mean clinical improvement. Hip arthroscopy with PAO did not appear to introduce complications beyond the PAO alone. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Abstract The labrum of the hip is recognized as being important to the stability of the hip and a major cause of hip pain. Damage to the labrum may result in increased joint stress and articular damage. Labral damage is often treated through various methods, among them simple stitch repair, base refixation, and debridement. Labral reconstruction becomes necessary when the labrum is too damaged to salvage, which renders labral repair improbable and labral debridement ineffective. In contrast to other methods that have been described for this treatment, our technique uses a semitendinosus allograft as a graft source, allowing for arthroscopic hip labral reconstruction. This technique has many advantages and is easily reproducible. It has shown promising results in patients with labral damage. The purpose of this article is to detail the step‐by‐step surgical technique of labral reconstruction using a semitendinosus allograft, in addition to the indications, pearls, and pitfalls of the technique. Technique Video video See video under supplementary data.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to (1) evaluate the clinical outcomes of a series of patients aged 60 years or older who underwent hip arthroscopy for labral tears with minimum 2‐year follow‐up and (2) identify risk factors for conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods Outcome data were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed in patients aged 60 years or older who underwent hip arthroscopy between April 2008 and May 2012. Four patient‐reported outcome (PRO) scores, pain scores, and satisfaction ratings were collected. Conversion to THA and revision surgery rates were recorded. A subgroup analysis compared survivors with patients requiring THA. Results Minimum 2‐year follow‐up was available for 30 patients with a mean age of 63.9 years. The 2‐year survivorship rate was 70%, with 9 patients undergoing conversion to THA at a mean of 1.1 years after hip arthroscopy. Two patients required additional surgery during the study period, for a reoperation rate of 37% (11 of 30 patients). The remaining cohort showed mean improvements in all PRO scores. All scores, except the sports‐related PRO ( P = .12), improved significantly from the preoperative baseline scores. Visual analog scale scores for pain decreased from a mean of 5.0 preoperatively to 2.7 postoperatively ( P = .003). Patients who required conversion to THA had lower preoperative modified Harris Hip Scores ( P = .015), lower preoperative Hip Outcome Score–Activity of Daily Living values ( P = .01), higher pain scores ( P = .05), greater acetabular inclination ( P = .023), and more severe chondral damage ( P = .033). Conclusions Arthroscopic treatment of labral tears in patients aged 60 years or older should be approached with caution. Patients in this age group had an overall 2‐year survivorship rate of 70% and should be counseled before surgery on the possibility of subsequent conversion to THA. Patients aged 60 years or older with poor preoperative PRO scores, high pain scores, radiographic evidence of borderline dysplasia, and severe chondral damage may be poor candidates for hip arthroscopy. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic case series.