Evaluation of Diazepam Nasal Spray in Patients with Epilepsy Concomitantly Using Maintenance Benzodiazepines: Interim Analysis from a Phase 3, Long-term, Open-label Safety Study (1760)
Time to Second Doses in Emergency Seizure Patients Treated With Valtoco® (diazepam nasal spray) Across 24 Hours: Subgroup Results From a Completed Phase 3, Open-label, Repeat Dose Safety Study (1756)
Safety Profile of Valtoco® (diazepam nasal spray) in Patients With Epilepsy: Final Results From a Phase 3, Open-Label, 12-Month Repeat Dose Safety Study (1753)
Effectiveness and Safety of Valtoco® (NRL-1; diazepam nasal spray) in Patients With Epilepsy and a History of Seasonal Allergies: Interim Results From a Phase 3, Open-Label, 12-Month Repeat Dose Study (2048)
Safety and Tolerability of NRL-1, an Intranasal Formulation of Diazepam, in Relationship to Usage Frequency in Subjects With Epilepsy: Interim Results From a Phase 3, Open-label, Repeat Dose Study (1992)
Timing to Administration and Ease of Dosing of Diazepam Nasal Spray Rescue Therapy for Seizure Clusters: Results From a Phase 3, Long-Term Open-Label, Repeat-Dose Safety Study (P15-8.001)
Safety of a Second Dose of Diazepam Nasal Spray Within 4 Hours in Patients With Seizure Clusters: Final Results From a Long-Term, Phase 3, Open-Label, Repeat-Dose Safety Study (P14-8.003)
Severe communication delays are independent of seizure burden and persist despite contemporary treatments in
SCN1A
+ Dravet syndrome: Insights from the
ENVISION
Abstract Objective Dravet syndrome (DS) is a developmental and epileptic encephalopathy characterized by high seizure burden, treatment‐resistant epilepsy, and developmental stagnation. Family members rate communication deficits among the most impactful disease manifestations. We evaluated seizure burden and language/communication development in children with DS. Methods ENVISION was a prospective, observational study evaluating children with DS associated with SCN1A pathogenic variants ( SCN1A + DS) enrolled at age ≤5 years. Seizure burden and antiseizure medications were assessed every 3 months and communication and language every 6 months with the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development 3rd edition and the parent‐reported Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales 3rd edition. We report data from the first year of observation, including analyses stratified by age at Baseline: 0:6–2:0 years:months (Y:M; youngest), 2:1–3:6 Y:M (middle), and 3:7–5:0 Y:M (oldest). Results Between December 2020 and March 2023, 58 children with DS enrolled at 16 sites internationally. Median follow‐up was 17.5 months (range = .0–24.0), with 54 of 58 (93.1%) followed for at least 6 months and 51 of 58 (87.9%) for 12 months. Monthly countable seizure frequency (MCSF) increased with age (median [minimum–maximum] = 1.0 in the youngest [1.0–70.0] and middle [1.0–242.0] age groups and 4.5 [.0–2647.0] in the oldest age group), and remained high, despite use of currently approved antiseizure medications. Language/communication delays were observed early, and developmental stagnation occurred after age 2 years with both instruments. In predictive modeling, chronologic age was the only significant covariate of seizure frequency (effect size = .52, p = .024). MCSF, number of antiseizure medications, age at first seizure, and convulsive status epilepticus were not predictors of language/communication raw scores. Significance In infants and young children with SCN1A + DS, language/communication delay and stagnation were independent of seizure burden. Our findings emphasize that the optimal therapeutic window to prevent language/communication delay is before 3 years of age.