Parker, Alexander S.

Abstract Background Chronic tenosynovitis of the upper extremities caused by Mycobacterium kansasii (M. kansasii) is uncommon, but symptoms may overlap with other more common diseases. Late diagnosis and treatment can lead to disfiguration of structures and rupture of tendons, resulting in worse cosmetic outcomes after reconstruction. Methods We present a clinical case and literature review of M. kansasii in patients with chronic tenosynovitis of upper extremities. PubMed was queried for cases of upper extremities tenosynovitis caused by M. kansasii. The keywords “M. kansasii,” “tenosynovitis” and synonyms were used for search in different combinations. Manuscripts, with no specific data or another condition, where the infection was not located in the upper extremities, were reviews, or not in English, were excluded from the study. Results We described 23 reported cases of tenosynovitis of the upper extremity caused by M. kansasii. An immunosuppressed state was present in eight (34.8%) cases, and 12 (52.2%) patients received immunosuppressive treatment. A long-time period between the first appearance of symptoms and the definitive diagnosis was identified (median: 7 months, interquartile range: 9). The most frequent symptoms were local swelling (65.2%), pain (56.5%), mass effect (26%), and stiffness (13%). Tendon rupture was found in three (13%) patients as a complication of the disease. Moreover, seven (30.4%) patients underwent previous surgeries to try to relieve the symptoms before definitive diagnosis was achieved. Conclusion M. kansasii is an important differential causal pathogen for tenosynovitis of the upper extremities. Although rare, raising awareness about this infectious disease is imperative to avoid inadequate management and hazardous aesthetic sequelae.

4567 Background: Trials combining anti-PDL1 and anti-VEGF therapies for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) are underway; however the relationship between the expression of PDL1 and genes in the VEGF pathway is poorly understood. Using the Affymetrix platform, we observed an inverse association between the expression of PDL1 and key genes in the VEGF pathway. Herein, we validate this inverse association using an independent set of 100 primary ccRCC tumors. Methods: From our registry database we sampled 100 ccRCC tumors with varying PDL1 protein expression (0%-100%) determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC). We extracted RNA from FFPE slides and performed RT-PCR to quantify gene expression of PDL1, VEGF, VEGFR1, and VEGFR2. All genes were normalized to the POLR2a gene. We evaluated the association of PDL1 protein expression and VEGF gene expression using Spearman rank correlation. In addition, we employed a linear mixed effects model to compare the fold-change in expression of VEGF genes between PDL1 low (0-5%, n=68) and PDL1 high (>5%, n=32) tumors. Results: As expected, PDL1 protein expression positively correlates with PDL1 geneexpression (corr=0.42, p<0.001). Validating our array data, PDL1 protein expression inversely correlates with expression of key VEGF genes: VEGF (corr=-0.23, p=0.01), VEGFR1 (corr=-0.34, p<0.001), and VEGFR2 (corr=-0.23, p=0.01). In our dichotomized analysis, we noted significantly higher expression of VEGF genes in the PDL1 low compared to the PDL1 high group: VEGF (fold change=1.82, p<0.001), VEGFR1 (FC=2.63, p<0.001), and VEGFR2 (FC=2.13, p=0.001). Conclusions: We independently validate an inverse association between the expression of PDL1 and key genes in the VEGF pathway in primary ccRCC. If validated further in larger studies, the existence of an immune evasive and an angiogenic phenotype within ccRCC could inform current clinical trials targeting these two pathways. Ultimately, whether VEGF signaling affects PDL1 expression, or whether angiogenic or immune evasive phenotypes predict response to anti-PDL1, anti-VEGF, or a combination of the two therapies remains unclear.

e15539 Background: Despite the development of prognostic algorithms based on clinico-pathologic features, the ability to identify aggressive forms of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) remains suboptimal. Topoisomerase IIA (TOP2a) is a biomarker of DNA replication and a target for antineoplastic agents. Herein, we evaluate the association of TOP2a expression in ccRCC tumors with pathologic features of aggressiveness and risk of cancer-specific death. Methods: We identified 1,380 patients who underwent nephrectomy to treat clinically localized ccRCC between 1/16/1990 and 4/14/2009. TOP2a expression was assessed using IHC and scored as number of positive cells per mm2. We evaluated TOP2a expression using a continuous variable and tertile categories. For associations with pathologic features we employed Kruskal-Wallis tests and for associations with cancer-specific survival we generated Cox proportional hazard regression models. Results: HigherTOP2a expression is associated with later stage, higher grade and higher MayoSSIGN score (all p < 0.001). The risk of death from RCC increases with increasing TOP2a expression (p trend < 0.0001), and this association remained strong after after multivariate adjustment for well-known predictors of RCC aggressiveness. Compared to patients in the lowest tertile, those patients with tumors in the highest tertile of TOP2a expression were at increased risk of RCC death (HR=2.62 95% CI 1.95-3.54; p<0.0001). Interestingly, among those patients with low risk disease (SSIGN score 0-3; ~95% 10 year survival), those with high TOP2a were at increased risk of RCC death (HR=3.48 95% CI 1.56-7.76; p =0.002). Conclusions: Higher TOP2a expression is associated with more aggressive pathologic features and increased risk of cancer-specific death among patients undergoing surgery for localized ccRCC. If confirmed, these data support further inquiry for TOP2a as a prognostic and predictive biomarker for ccRCC patients.

AbstractObjectivesPrevious studies noted discordance of programmed death‐1 (PD‐1) and one of its ligands (PD‐L1) across patient‐matched primary and metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). There are inconsistencies if the primary or metastatic tumor has higher expression, and whether metastatic tumor expression is associated with patient outcome. Thus, we examined PD‐1 and PD‐L1 in patient‐matched tumors using a large number of ccRCC patients with long follow‐up.Materials and MethodsWe analyzed PD‐1 and PD‐L1 using immunohistochemistry in patient‐matched primary and metastatic tumors from 110 ccRCC patients. Concordance was assessed among longitudinal metastatic tumors, as well as across patient‐matched primary and metastatic tumors. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate the associations of metastatic tumor expression with cancer‐specific survival.ResultsWe observed inter‐metastatic tumor heterogeneity of PD‐1 in 25 (69%) of the 36 patients and of PD‐L1 in seven (19%) patients. Concordance between patient‐matched primary and metastatic tumors was 73% (Kappa = 0.16, 95% CI: −0.003‐0.32). Similarly, concordance of PD‐L1 between metastatic and patient‐matched primary tumors was 78% (Kappa = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.09‐0.46). Both markers demonstrated higher expression in primary vs metastatic tumors. Metastatic tumor expression of PD‐1 was significantly associated with metastatic location (P < .0001) and ccRCC‐specific survival (HR = 2.15, 95% CI: 1.06‐4.36, P = .035).ConclusionsThe expression of PD‐1 and PD‐L1 is discordant across patient‐matched ccRCC tumors, with higher expression in primary tumors. Higher PD‐1 expression was associated with metastatic location and lower cancer‐specific survival. If validated, these results highlight the importance of evaluating these biomarkers in metastatic tissue specifically.

Abstract Background: The incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the United States (U.S.) continues to rise and this trend cannot be fully attributed to incidental detection via increased use of abdominal imaging. Related to this, obesity rates have been rising steadily in the U.S. for several decades and obesity is one of the most widely accepted risk factors for the development of RCC. Interestingly, to date there are limited data regarding the molecular mechanisms that link obesity with an increased risk of RCC. Moreover, the few studies that have investigated the molecular underpinnings that link obesity and RCC have all used a candidate gene approach focusing exclusively on evaluation of germline genetic alterations (i.e., host genetics) and not somatic alterations in the tumor itself. Motivated by this, we used a multi-stage design to identify and validate genes that are associated with obesity-related clear cell RCC (ccRCC). Methods: We conducted a gene-expression microarray study of ccRCC and compared gene expression between 19 obese and 46 non-obese patients in both ccRCC tumors and patient-matched normal kidney tissues. Analyses were first stratified by smoking status, the other widely acceptable risk factor for RCC, and subsequently performed on the pooled cohort. To identify genes that are specific to obesity-related ccRCC, we identified Affymetrix probesets that had a tissue type-by-obesity status interaction p-value &lt;0.01 amongst non-smokers (stage 1), an interaction p-value &lt;0.05 in patients with a history of smoking (stage 2) and an interaction p-value&lt;0.01 in the pooled analysis (stage 3). Lastly, targeted validation was performed via RT-PCR on an independent cohort of 19 obese and 54 non-obese patients in both ccRCC tumors and patient-matched normal kidney tissues (stage 4). In addition to evaluating differential expression, an enrichment analysis was performed using DAVID and the results were compared to the Genetic Association Database. Results: From our microarray analyses, we identified two genes and one non-coding RNA as having candidate associations with obesity-related ccRCC: EFCAB6, ENRAGE and NCRNA00263, respectively. Using RT-PCR, we validated that while expression of ENRAGE is similar in normal kidney tissue across obese and non-obese subjects, ENRAGE is significantly over expressed in ccRCC tissues from obese patients compared to non-obese subjects. Others have shown that ENRAGE is a useful biomarker of inflammation and has a positive association with visceral fat adiposity, which provides further credence to our observations. As an alternative analysis approach, using the Genetic Association Database to identify medically-relevant somatic features, we also observed a putative relationship between GAL, IL6R, NMB and SORBS1 with obesity. Although the results of this alternative analysis approach are exploratory and thus need to be validated, there are some interesting relationships to note. Particularly, several variants in IL6R have been previously linked to obesity, diabetes and fat mass. Also, GAL is thought to play a role in drug resistance to chemotherapy in cell lines, warranting continued investigation to see if obese individuals with high or low expression show differential drug response. Conclusions: We provide evidence that overexpression of ENRAGE in ccRCC tumor tissue is an obesity-associated alteration. Up regulation of ENRAGE could lead to local, autocrine stimulation of the RAGE receptor and thus support cancer progression. Additionally, we show evidence of a putative relationship between GAL, IL6R, NMB and SORBS1 with obesity; however, these results need to be validated. Citation Format: Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow, Daniel J. Serie, Brian M. Bot, Richard W. Joseph, Steven N. Hart, John C. Cheville, Alexander S. Parker. Overexpression of ENRAGE is an obesity-related alteration in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual AACR International Conference on Frontiers in Cancer Prevention Research; 2013 Oct 27-30; National Harbor, MD. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Can Prev Res 2013;6(11 Suppl): Abstract nr B42.

Abstract Introduction: An inverse association between alcohol consumption and risk of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is well reported in the literature. Despite this, no investigators have explored the potential for effect modification of this association by genetic variations in enzymes that metabolize alcohol. Motivated by this, we conducted a pilot investigation of the role of genetic variation in the alcohol dehydrogenase genes (ADH) as an effect modifier of the association of alcohol and RCC risk. Methods: We analyzed data on 121 RCC cases and 121 controls. Cases were prospectively collected as part of our Renal Registry in the Department of Urology. Controls were recruited through the Family Medicine and frequency matched to cases on age, gender and state of residence. We collected detailed risk factor data (self-report questionnaire) as well as a DNA sample on cases and controls. We utilized Sequenome analysis to determine presence of published SNPs in the ADH gene cluster (ADH1-7). We employed logistic regression with interaction terms as well as stratified analyses to evaluate effect modification by genetic variants in the ADH gene cluster on the association of alcohol consumption and RCC risk. Results: Compared to non-drinkers, those that consumed alcohol above the median experienced a lowering in RCC risk (OR=0.80; 95% CI 0.5 to 1.43). We observed evidence of interactions with 6 SNPs in the ADH gene (p-values from 0.05-0.2). As an example, in stratified analysis, the inverse association strengthened in those without the minor allele present at rs1154454 in ADH7 (OR=0.56; 95% CI 0.3 to 1.0; p=0.08) while evidence of an increased in RCC risk was noted among those with the minor allele (OR=2.14; 95CI 0.8 – 5.7; p=0.1). Adjustment for age and gender did not alter our results. Conclusion: Our pilot data suggest that specific variants in the ADH gene cluster may modify the reported protective effect of alcohol consumption on RCC risk. Given the possible implications for improving our understanding of the biology of this association and informing prevention, future investigations that analyze a larger sample size and examine additional variants are warranted. Citation Format: Alexander Scott Parker, Nancy Diehl, Michelle L. Arnold, Shauna Rivera, Ashley Cannon, Kaitlynn Custer, Bradley Leibovich. Alcohol consumption, genetic variation in alcohol dehydrogenase genes, and risk of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual AACR International Conference on Frontiers in Cancer Prevention Research; 2013 Oct 27-30; National Harbor, MD. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Can Prev Res 2013;6(11 Suppl): Abstract nr A62.

Abstract Introduction: Laboratory studies have demonstrated that zinc and zinc transporters play important roles in the development of urological cancers, including prostate, bladder, and renal cell cancer. To date however, there have been no efforts to evaluate whether germline variation in zinc transporter genes alter the risk of developing these cancers. Motivated by this, we evaluated associations of known variants in zinc transporter genes with risk of prostate, bladder, and renal cell cancer using three NCI Genome Wide Association Study (GWAS) data sets downloaded from dbGaP. Methods: Data consisted of GWAS data from the PLCO Screening Trial (prostate; 1172 cases, 1157 controls); Bladder Cancer study (3527 cases, 5119 controls); and Renal Cancer study (1453 cases, 3531 controls). All genotyped variants in 10 ZNT family genes (ZNT1-ZNT10) and 14 ZIP family genes (ZIP1-ZIP14) in each data set were analyzed by logistic regression models to evaluate the association of each variant with risk of developing prostate, bladder, and renal cancer, respectively. We evaluated these associations in a univariable setting, after adjusting for available covariates, such as age and gender. Correction for multiple comparisons used Max T permutation tests. Results: One variant in ZIP11, rs8081059, was associated with increased risk of renal cancer (OR=1.28, 95% CI= 1.13-1.45; corrected p= 0.049). Another ZIP11 variant, rs11871756, was associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer risk (OR=1.43, 95% CI 1.24-1.63; corrected p=0.0002). We also found three variants in ZIP11 associated with a decreased risk of bladder cancer: rs11077654 (OR=0.76, 95% CI 0.68-0.85; corrected p=0.001), rs9913017 (OR=0.76, 95% CI= 0.68-0.85; corrected p=0.002), and rs4969054 (OR=0.78, 95% CI 0.69-0.88; corrected p=0.02). Interestingly, these three protective variants are within the same LD block. There were no associations between zinc transporter variants and prostate cancer risk. Conclusion: We report for the first time that specific genetic variants of a zinc transporter gene, ZIP11, are associated with risk of renal and bladder cancer. If validated in larger, more focused studies, further investigations are warranted to explore the functional significance of ZIP11 in these two cancers. Citation Format: Lang Wu, Kari G. Rabe, Alexander S. Parker, Gloria M. Petersen. ZIP11 and susceptibility to renal and bladder cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual AACR International Conference on Frontiers in Cancer Prevention Research; 2013 Oct 27-30; National Harbor, MD. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Can Prev Res 2013;6(11 Suppl): Abstract nr A52.