Ramirez, Yulian P.

Abstract The cellular responses to two new temozolomide (TMZ) analogues, DP68 and DP86, acting against glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) cell lines and primary culture models are reported. Dose–response analysis of cultured GBM cells revealed that DP68 is more potent than DP86 and TMZ and that DP68 was effective even in cell lines resistant to TMZ. On the basis of a serial neurosphere assay, DP68 inhibits repopulation of these cultures at low concentrations. The efficacy of these compounds was independent of MGMT and MMR functions. DP68-induced interstrand DNA cross-links were demonstrated with H2O2-treated cells. Furthermore, DP68 induced a distinct cell–cycle arrest with accumulation of cells in S phase that is not observed for TMZ. Consistent with this biologic response, DP68 induces a strong DNA damage response, including phosphorylation of ATM, Chk1 and Chk2 kinases, KAP1, and histone variant H2AX. Suppression of FANCD2 expression or ATR expression/kinase activity enhanced antiglioblastoma effects of DP68. Initial pharmacokinetic analysis revealed rapid elimination of these drugs from serum. Collectively, these data demonstrate that DP68 is a novel and potent antiglioblastoma compound that circumvents TMZ resistance, likely as a result of its independence from MGMT and mismatch repair and its capacity to cross-link strands of DNA. Mol Cancer Ther; 14(1); 111–9. ©2014 AACR.

Abstract Resistance to temozolomide (TMZ) in the majority of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is mediated by O6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT). In this study, the efficacy of TMZ, a mono-functional methylating agent, was compared to a bi-functional TMZ analog (DP68) and a corresponding mono-functional TMZ analog (DP86) in established glioma lines (T98, U251), primary GBM xenograft lines (GBM12, GBM22, GBM6) and a TMZ-resistant model with high level MGMT expression (GBM12TMZ). Using a combination of CyQuant and neurosphere assays, the IC50 with TMZ treatment for MGMT expressing lines (U251, GBM12, GBM22) was much lower than non-expressing lines (T98, G6, G12TMZ), while all lines were sensitive to DP68 regardless of MGMT status (see Table). In the same assays, cells were less sensitive to DP86, but cytotoxicity was also independent of MGMT status. In both U251 and T98, DP68 resulted in a time-and dose-dependent induction of markers for DNA damage and checkpoint activation (P-H2AX, ATM, KAP1, Chk1 and Chk2) and a pronounced S-phase arrest within 24 hours of treatment. Based on these results and the hypothesis that DP68 induces DNA cross-links, siRNA knockdown was used to further dissect the importance of the ATM and ATR signaling pathways and the Fanconi Anemia (FA) cross-link repair pathway for DP68 cytotoxicity. Compared to no treatment, 1 microM DP68 resulted in 100% relative absorbance in siCONtrol transfected U251 cells, 41% for siATR, 35% for siFANCD2 and 90% for siATM. In contrast, only siATR and not siFAND2 nor siATM sensitized U251 cells to DP86. Similarly, inhibition of ATR (VE-821), but not ATM (KU-60019) potently sensitized cells to DP68 (see Table). Taken together, the inhibitory effects of DP68 are superior to TMZ in the GBM cell lines tested, regardless of MGMT expression. Furthermore, the siRNA and western blotting suggest that recovery from DP68 is dependent on ATR and the FA repair pathway. TMZ (IC50, microM) DP68 (IC50, microM)) DP86 (IC50, microM)) CyQuant Ctrl 1uM VE-821 1uM KU-60019 Ctrl 1uM VE-821 1uM KU-60019 Ctrl 1uM VE-821 1uM KU-60019 U251 25 20 20 2.5 0.8 2.1 70 40 65 T98 >320 200 260 9 2 7 115 60 115 Neurosphere Ctrl VE-821 KU-60019 Ctrl VE-821 KU-60019 Ctrl VE-821 KU-60019 G12 4 3.2 4.2 0.9 0.08 0.7 18 6 18 G22 40 NA NA 1 NA NA 40 NA NA G6 160 NA NA 0.5 NA NA 15 NA NA G12TMZ >300 NA NA 2 NA NA 22 NA NA Citation Format: Ann C. Mladek Tuma, Yulian Ramirez, Dimitrios Pletsas, Richard T. Wheelhouse, Roger M. Phillips, Ross H. Alonzo, Kaitlyn Knudson, Jann N. Sarkaria. Cytotoxicity of a novel bi-functional temozolomide analog, DP68, is independent of MGMT status in glioblastoma models. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4476. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-4476