Hunt, KK

Abstract Support: Alliance U10CA180821; Alliance Statistical Center grant U10CA180882; ACOSOG grant U10CA76001 HER2 gene amplification and its corresponding overexpression are present in approximately 12% of invasive breast cancers. While HER2-targeted agents (e.g. trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and lapatinib) are effective treatments, resistance remains a major cause of death from HER2-positive breast cancer. Mechanisms of resistance are poorly understood. Without a molecular understanding of these mechanisms, therapeutic advances will be delayed. We have generated molecular profiles of primary HER2-positive breast cancers treated on a neoadjuvant clinical trial, and compared features associated with response to treatment. The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z1041 trial in HER2-positive breast cancer was designed to compare the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate of a regimen of paclitaxel and trastuzumab, followed by trastuzumab administered with fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC-75) to a regimen of FEC-75 alone followed by paclitaxel and trastuzumab. The trial identified no difference in pCR rates between the regimens (Buzdar et al., The Lancet Oncology 2013). In supplement to the tissues obtained from 37 of the patients enrolled in the Z1041 trial, an additional 11 cases were obtained from a single institution study (201101961) of patients treated with neoadjuvant trastuzumab that had pre-treatment core biopsies suitable for genomic studies. We have extracted genomic DNA from both pretreatment tumor biopsies and blood samples of these 48 patients and performed whole genome (WGS) and exome sequencing. Coincident with these efforts, we have extracted high quality RNA from 42 of the 48 biopsies, and have processed RNA-seq profiles of the tumors. Among patients in this cohort, 24 (50%) achieved a pCR. Because no difference was observed between arms of the Z1041 trial, patients with or without a pCR were directly compared without adjusting for treatment regimen. On average, each tumor and normal sample pair were sequenced to a depth of 49.4x and 32.5x by WGS respectively. In total, 15,027 candidate somatic variants were identified in known genes, including 11,606 missense, 860 nonsense, and 418 frameshift insertions or deletions. Preliminary results identified mutations in HER2 that were associated with the failure to achieve pCR in several cases. Furthermore, tumors assigned to the HER2-enriched subtype by RNA-seq analysis were more likely to achieve a pCR (19 compared to 8) than tumors with genomic features indicative of either the luminal or basal-like subtypes (3 compared to 12); a significant difference in the proportion of cases that achieve pCR (Fisher's exact test p-value = 0.0032). The identification of these features suggests that it may be possible to predict, at the time of diagnosis, those patients who will not respond to the current standard of care for HER2-positive breast cancer. Citation Format: Lesurf R, Griffith O, Griffith M, Watson MA, Hoog J, Ellis MJ, Ota D, Suman VJ, Meric-Bernstam F, Leitch AM, Boughey JC, Unzeitig G, Buzdar AU, Hunt KK, Mardis ER. The genomics of response to neoadjuvant trastuzumab and chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer – Results from the ACOSOG Z1041 (Alliance) trial. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD6-02.

Abstract Background ACOSOG Z1041 (Alliance) found pathological complete response rates in women with operable HER2-positive breast cancer were similar with FEC → P+T (Arm 1) and P+T → FEC+T (Arm 2) where treatment was administered as 5-FU 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 75 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 day 1 of a 21-day cycle x 4; paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 weekly x 12 and trastuzumab 4 mg/kg once then 2 mg/kg weekly x 11. We now report DFS and OS results with a median follow up of 4.4 years (range: 26 days to 6.2 years). Methods All patients who began study treatment were included in the analyses. Stratified log rank tests and stratified proportional hazard models were used to assess differences in DFS and OS from randomization between treatment arms. Results From September 15, 2007 to December 15, 2011, 282 women with HER2-positive breast cancer were enrolled. Two patients randomized to arm 1 withdrew consent prior to treatment and are excluded from these analyses. Patient and disease characteristics of the remaining 280 women (arm 1, n=138; arm 2, n=142) were similar between treatment arms. Recurrences and deaths are shown in the table. DFS were not found to differ with respect to treatment arm (stratified logrank p=0.6870; HR stratified (Arm2/Arm1)=0.88; 95%CI: 0.48-1.61). Also, OS was not found to differ with respect to treatment arm (stratified logrank p=0.8790; HR stratified (Arm2/Arm1)=1.07; 95%CI: 0.43-2.69). Conclusions Concurrent administration of trastuzumab with anthracyclines offers no additional benefit in terms of achieving pathologic complete response or improving survival and is not needed. FEC → P+TP+T → FEC+T Arm 1Arm 2n138142Recurrences2022Deaths811 Grant Support: U10 CA76001 The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00513292. Citation Format: Buzdar AU, Suman VJ, Meric-Bernstam F, Leitch AM, Ellis MJ, Boughey JC, Unzeitig GW, Royce ME, Ewer MS, Hunt KK. Disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) data from ACOSOG Z1041 (Alliance) a randomized neoadjuvant trial comparing FEC followed by paclitaxel plus trastuzumab (FEC → P+T) with paclitaxel plus trastuzumab followed by FEC plus trastuzumab (P+T → FEC+T) in HER2-positive operable breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-14-02.

Abstract Background: The utility of sentinel lymph node (SLN) surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients presenting with node-positive breast cancer has not been determined. The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0171 trial was designed to evaluate SLN surgery after NAC in women presenting with node positive disease. Methods: ACOSOG Z1071 enrolled women with clinical T0-4, N1-2, M0 breast cancer receiving NAC. At the time of surgery, all patients were to undergo SLN surgery followed by axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). The primary endpoint was false negative rate (FNR) in women with cN1 disease with 2 or more SLNs reviewed. Positive SLNs were defined as metastases >0.2mm on H&E. The protocol encouraged dual tracer technique. A Bayesian study design with a non-informative prior was chosen to assess whether the probability that the SLN surgery FNR is greater than 10%. Results: From July 2009 to July 2011, 756 patients were enrolled from 136 institutions. Fifteen women were ineligible and 33 withdrew. Of 708 evaluable pts (668 cN1, 40 cN2), 643 had a SLN identified and an ALND (607 cN1, with indeterminate SLN results in 2); 52 pts (48 cN1) had no SLN identified and had ALND; 11 underwent ALND only (all cN1), and 2 pts had SLN only (both cN1). In patients with SLN and ALND, the SLN identification rate was 92.5% (92.7% in cN1, 90% in cN2). SLN correctly identified nodal status in 84% of the 695 pts [258 of pathologically node negative and 327 of pathologically node positive; cN1: 83.8% (549/655), cN2: 90.0% (36/40)]. Of the 643 pts with a SLN identified there was a complete pathologic response in 40.3% (40.3 % for cN1 and 50% for cN2). Of the pts with a positive SLN, the SLN was the only site of disease in 40%. For pts with cN1 disease with 2+ SLNs identified with residual nodal disease, the SLN FNR was 12.8%. In pts with dual tracer technique the FNR was 11.1%. There were no FN results among pts with cN2 disease with 2+ SLNs reviewed. Of the 40 pts with a false negative SLN of the 528 cN1 patients with 2+ SLNs examined, the number of positive nodes at ALND was 1 (50.0%); 2 (25%); 3 (10.0%) and 4–9 (15.0%). Conclusions: NAC resulted in eradication of lymph node disease in 40% of node positive breast cancer patients. SLN surgery after NAC in node positive breast cancer pts correctly identified nodal status in 84% of all patients and was associated with a FNR of 12.8%. The FNR of SLN is higher than the prespecified study endpoint of 10%. Further analysis of factors associated with FNR such as clinical response, histological findings and axillary ultrasound findings is warranted prior to widespread use of SLN in these patients. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr S2-1.

Abstract Purpose: The stage IB designation was added to the AJCC 7th edition staging system to denote micrometastasis in patients with T1 tumors. We have previously examined this group and found that receptor status and nuclear grade were better survival discriminates than the presence of micrometastases. The current study was undertaken to validate this finding in a larger cohort from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0010 study. Methods: Clinicopathologic and outcomes data from patients enrolled on ACOSOG Z0010 were recorded. All patients underwent breast conserving surgery, sentinel lymph node biopsy and whole breast radiation for clinical T1-2, N0 breast cancer. Sentinel lymph nodes were evaluated by H&E locally and if negative, by immunohistochemistry (IHC) at a central laboratory. Patients were staged according to the 7th edition AJCC system and recurrence-free (RFS), disease-specific (DSS) and overall survival (OS) were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Results: There were 5210 eligible and evaluable patients enrolled on ACOSOG Z0010. AJCC stage distribution was known in 4590 and included: 2849 (62.0%) stage IA, 376 (8.2%) stage IB, 878 (19.1%) stage IIA, 322 (7.0%) stage IIB, and 170 (3.7%) stage III. Median follow-up for the cohort was 9.0 years (range 0–12.6). Five and 10-year RFS, DSS and OS rates for patients with stage IA versus IB disease are shown in table 1. There were no significant differences between groups. When all stage I patients (stage IA and IB) were evaluated by ER status (positive vs negative) or grade (grade 1 vs 2 vs 3), these biologic factors were able to significantly discriminate patients with respect to RFS, DSS and OS (table 2). Conclusion: Differentiating patients with micrometastases (stage IB) from node negative patients (stage IA) does not stratify patients well with respect to survival. Biologic factors including ER status and grade are better discriminants of survival than the presence of small volume nodal metastases in patients with early stage breast cancer. Breast cancer staging should include biologic factors from the primary tumor. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-01-06.