Carabenciov, Ivan D.

Background Spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) results from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage due to spinal dural tears or CSF–venous fistulas. Orthostatic headache is the hallmark presentation, though severe downward displacement of the brainstem may lead to altered consciousness or coma. Definitive treatments include targeted epidural blood patches, venous embolization, or surgical repair. Methods This article reviews the role of the Trendelenburg position as a temporizing measure in the acute management of SIH. We describe the correct technique, physiologic rationale, and practical considerations for its application, with attention to both therapeutic and diagnostic utility. Discussion Positioning the patient with the feet elevated above the head can reduce brain sag and provide short-term symptomatic relief while awaiting definitive treatment. Although the Trendelenburg position is widely used in practice, supporting evidence remains limited, and clinicians must be aware of its benefits, indications, and inherent limitations. Its appropriate application may assist in stabilizing patients with acute or severe SIH, particularly those with impaired consciousness, until more definitive interventions are pursued.

Abstract BACKGROUND Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease is a hereditary cancer syndrome characterized by development of multiple neoplasms, including central nervous system (CNS) hemangioblastomas, renal cell carcinoma (RCC), pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs), and retinal hemangioblastomas. Belzutifan, a hypoxia-inducible factor 2-alpha (HIF-2α) inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in treating VHL-associated tumors. This study evaluates our institutional experience with belzutifan in patients with VHL-related tumors. MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study across three Mayo Clinic sites, including patients aged ≥18 years with genetically confirmed VHL disease who received belzutifan between October 2021 and March 2025. Clinical/radiological data, and adverse events (AEs) were extracted from electronic health records. Tumor responses were assessed using RECIST v1.1 criteria for RCC, pNET, CNS hemangioblastoma. Retinal hemangioblastoma responses were evaluated through ophthalmologic assessments. RESULTS Forty-five patients were included (median age 44 58% female). Sixty-seven percent had RCC, 91% had CNS hemangioblastomas, 53% had pNETs, and 62% had retinal hemangioblastomas. The median duration of belzutifan therapy was 22.6 months (range 1.0-41.4 months). Among patients with RCC (n=26), overall response rate (ORR) was 19% and median time to best response (MTBR) was 7.4 months. Five patients had partial response (PR), 15 had stable disease (SD), and 1 had progressive disease (PD). For CNS hemangioblastomas (n=41), ORR was 12%, MTBR was 6.2 months. 5 patients had PR, 30 had SD, and none had PD. For pNET (n=17), ORR was 41%, MTBR was 8.2 months. One patient had CR, 6 patients had PR, 6 had SD, none had PD. For retinal hemangioblastomas (n=28), 6 (21%) showed improvement, 9 (32%) remained stable, and 3 (11%) showed progression. MTBR was 6.7 months. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 98% of patients. Common AEs included anemia (89%), fatigue (80%), hypoxia (18%), and headache (13%). Grade 3 AEs were observed in 20% of patients, including anemia (7%), hypoxia (9%), fatigue (4%), pneumonitis (2%), loss of consciousness (2%). One patient experienced a grade 4 event (status epilepticus). Anemia management involved iron supplementation (n=11), RBC transfusion (n=3), dose reduction (n=2), treatment holiday (n=8), permanent discontinuation (n=1). Hypoxia management included dose reduction (n=1), treatment holiday (n=3), discontinuation (n=1). CONCLUSION Belzutifan shows clinical activity across various VHL-associated neoplasms in real-world practice, with a manageable safety profile. The lower ORR compared to the phase III trial may reflect differences in baseline disease, including lower tumor burden in our cohort. These findings support its continued use in VHL disease, with attention to monitoring and managing treatment-related AEs.

e13893 Background: For individuals with CNS tumors who have experience difficulties with in-person (IP) evaluations due to disease-related neurologic disability or the costs associated with travel, telehealth (TH) offers a convenient and timely alternative for accessing specialized neuro-oncology care. We report our institution’s experience with telehealth utilization in neuro-oncology. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who had at least one neuro-oncology telehealth visit between August 2021 and May 2024 at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. Reasons for visits, outcomes of appointments, acute care utilization following visits was reviewed. Results: A total of 660 patients who had at least one TH visit between August 2021 and May 2024 were included in the analysis. Median age was 56 (range 20-98), 49% were female, and 92% were white. Most patients resided in the US Midwest (84%), followed by the South (8%), West (5%), Northeast (1%), and US Territories (< 1%). Less than two percent were international patients. The most common primary visit diagnosis was glioblastoma (GBM, 26%), followed by astrocytoma, IDH-mutant (17%), meningioma (17%), oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant, 1p/19q codeleted (7%). Of 6657 visits reviewed, 2745 (41%) were conducted via TH. Telehealth visits served various purposes, including consultation for newly diagnosed tumors or abnormal MRIs (n = 26), second opinion for an established tumor diagnosis (n = 119), discussion about clinical trial participation (n = 108), tumor-related treatment discussions (n = 719), chemotherapy education (n = 161), new symptom assessment (n = 117), symptom management (n = 366), and tumor surveillance (n = 1694). Outcomes from telehealth visits included enrollment in clinical trials (n = 28), proceeding with tumor-directed surgery (n = 46), initiation of radiation therapy (n = 88), starting or changing systemic therapy (n = 377), continuing existing systemic therapy (n = 932), transition to supportive care (n = 45), tumor diagnostic workup (n = 28), continuation of tumor surveillance (n = 1254). Acute care utilization, defined as an emergency department visit or hospitalization within one month of an appointment, was the same following telehealth visits compared to in-person visits (6.9% for IP vs 5% for TH, p = 0.507). Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that telehealth can effectively support all aspects of neuro-oncology care, ranging from initial diagnosis discussions to systemic therapy management and transitions to supportive care. Telehealth offers a convenient and accessible method of care delivery option for patients faced with neurologic illness. Additionally, THs do not lead to increased acute care utilization compared to IP evaluations.

We report a case highlighting key clinical, CSF, and imaging findings of primary diffuse leptomeningeal gliomatosis of the spine.