Back to Authors

Isseh, Iyad

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0010-7003

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 3

Burden of hospitalization in clinically diagnosed peripheral artery disease: A community-based study
Arruda‐Olson, Adelaide M. , Pacha, Homam Moussa , Afzal, Naveed , Abram, S.E., Lewis, Bradley R., Isseh, Iyad , Haddad, Raad A., Bailey, Kent R. , Rooke, Thom W. , Moussa Pacha, Homam, Abram, Sara, Haddad, Raad, Scott, Christopher G. , Liu, Hongfang , Kullo, Iftikhar J.

Vascular Medicine | October 25, 2017 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 23-31

10.1177/1358863x17736152 Get It

The burden and predictors of hospitalization over time in community-based patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) have not been established. This study evaluates the frequency, reasons and predictors of hospitalization over time in community-based patients with PAD. We assembled an inception cohort of 1798 PAD cases from Olmsted County, MN, USA (mean age 71.2 years, 44% female) from 1 January 1998 through 31 December 2011 who were followed until 2014. Two age- and sex-matched controls ( n = 3596) were identified for each case. ICD-9 codes were used to ascertain the primary reasons for hospitalization. Patients were censored at death or last follow-up. The most frequent reasons for hospitalization were non-cardiovascular: 68% of 8706 hospitalizations in cases and 78% of 8005 hospitalizations in controls. A total of 1533 (85%) cases and 2286 (64%) controls ( p < 0.001) were hospitalized at least once; 1262 (70%) cases and 1588 (44%) controls ( p < 0.001) ≥ two times. In adjusted models, age, prior hospitalization and comorbid conditions were independently associated with increased risk of recurrent hospitalizations in both groups. In cases, severe PAD (ankle–brachial index < 0.5) (HR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.15, 1.36) and poorly compressible arteries (HR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.16, 1.38) were each associated with increased risk for recurrent hospitalization. We demonstrate an increased rate of hospitalization in community-based patients with PAD and identify predictors of recurrent hospitalizations. These observations may inform strategies to reduce the burden of hospitalization of PAD patients.
Incorporating a Genetic Risk Score Into Coronary Heart Disease Risk Estimates
Jouni, Hayan, Austin, Erin , Brown, Sherry‐Ann , Kruisselbrink, Teresa , Isseh, Iyad , Haddad, Raad A., Marroush, Tariq S. , Broeckel, Ulrich , Schaid, Daniel J. , Montori, Víctor M. , Bailey, Kent R. , Austin, Erin E, Kruisselbrink, Teresa M, Isseh, Iyad N, Shameer, Khader, Kullo, Iftikhar J. , Shameer, Khader , Olson, Janet E. , Green, Robert C. , Montori, Victor M

Circulation | February 26, 2016 | Volume: 133 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1181-1188

10.1161/circulationaha.115.020109 Get It

Background— Whether knowledge of genetic risk for coronary heart disease (CHD) affects health-related outcomes is unknown. We investigated whether incorporating a genetic risk score (GRS) in CHD risk estimates lowers low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. Methods and Results— Participants (n=203, 45–65 years of age, at intermediate risk for CHD, and not on statins) were randomly assigned to receive their 10-year probability of CHD based either on a conventional risk score (CRS) or CRS + GRS ( + GRS). Participants in the + GRS group were stratified as having high or average/low GRS. Risk was disclosed by a genetic counselor followed by shared decision making regarding statin therapy with a physician. We compared the primary end point of LDL-C levels at 6 months and assessed whether any differences were attributable to changes in dietary fat intake, physical activity levels, or statin use. Participants (mean age, 59.4±5 years; 48% men; mean 10-year CHD risk, 8.5±4.1%) were allocated to receive either CRS (n=100) or + GRS (n=103). At the end of the study period, the + GRS group had a lower LDL-C than the CRS group (96.5±32.7 versus 105.9±33.3 mg/dL; P =0.04). Participants with high GRS had lower LDL-C levels (92.3±32.9 mg/dL) than CRS participants ( P =0.02) but not participants with low GRS (100.9±32.2 mg/dL; P =0.18). Statins were initiated more often in the + GRS group than in the CRS group (39% versus 22%, P <0.01). No significant differences in dietary fat intake and physical activity levels were noted. Conclusions— Disclosure of CHD risk estimates that incorporated genetic risk information led to lower LDL-C levels than disclosure of CHD risk based on conventional risk factors alone. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01936675.
Family History as a Risk Factor for Carotid Artery Stenosis
Khaleghi, Mahyar, Isseh, Iyad , Jouni, Hayan, Sohn, Sunghwan , Bailey, Kent R. , Isseh, Iyad N, Kullo, Iftikhar J.

Stroke | July 9, 2014 | Volume: 45 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 2252-2256

10.1161/strokeaha.114.006245 Get It

Background and Purpose— We investigated whether family history of stroke or coronary heart disease (CHD) is associated with presence of carotid artery stenosis (CAS). Methods— The study cohort included 864 patients (72±8 years; 68% men) with CAS and 1698 controls (61±11 years; 55% men) referred for noninvasive vascular testing. CAS was defined as ≥70% stenosis in the internal carotid artery on ultrasound or history of carotid revascularization. Controls did not have CAS or history of cerebrovascular disease or CHD. Family history of stroke and CHD was defined as having ≥1 first-degree relative who had stroke or CHD before age 65 years. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate whether family history of stroke or CHD was associated with presence of CAS, independent of conventional risk factors. Results— Family history of stroke and CHD was present more often in patients with CAS than in controls, with a resulting odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of 2.02 (1.61–2.53) and 2.01 (1.70–2.37), respectively. The associations remained significant after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, smoking, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia; odds ratios: 1.41 (1.06–1.90) and 1.69 (1.35–2.10), respectively. A greater number of affected relatives with stroke or CHD was associated with higher odds of CAS; adjusted odds ratios: 1.25 (0.91–1.72) and 1.46 (1.14–1.89) versus 2.65 (1.35–5.40) and 2.13 (1.57–2.90) for patients with 1 and ≥2 affected relatives with stroke and CHD, respectively. Conclusions— Family history of stroke and of CHD were each associated with CAS, suggesting that shared genetic and environmental factors contribute to the risk of CAS.