Convertino, Víctor A.

Background The baroreflex plays an integral role in blood pressure maintenance by altering heart rate and sympathetic activity in response to changes in arterial pressure. Baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) has been shown to decrease linearly during progressive exposure to central hypovolemia as induced by lower body negative pressure (LBNP), and can be used as an index of decompensation status during hemorrhage. Circulating epinephrine is significantly elevated during high stress situations such as hemorrhage; however, it is unclear whether epinephrine influences BRS during progressive exposure to central hypovolemia. Based on previous work, we hypothesized epinephrine would attenuate any reduction in spontaneous cardiac baroreflex sensitivity during LBNP. Methods Ten young (35±3 yrs), healthy (BMI 24±1 kg/m 2 ) men and women (6M/4F) underwent LBNP protocols on 2 separate days consisting of a 10‐min pre‐infusion baseline, 15‐min infusion period (randomized to saline or epinephrine, 0.1 μg/kg/min), 10‐min post‐infusion baseline, and 5 minutes of LBNP at −15, −30, −45, −60, −70, and −80 mmHg until the onset of presyncope (range= −30 to −80 mmHg). Presyncope was defined as a rapid decrease in systolic blood pressure greater than 15 mmHg, systolic blood pressure less than 80 mmHg, bradycardia, or voluntary termination due to presyncopal symptoms. Heart rate (HR; electrocardiogram) and blood pressure (BP; radial arterial catheter) were recorded continuously. Spontaneous cardiac BRS was determined using the sequence method (WinCPRS). Data are reported from both 10‐min baselines and from 1 minute at 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 percent of each individual's total LBNP exposure time. Results We observed no significant differences in total exposure time (1475±150 vs. 1415±79s; p=0.69) or cumulative stress index (820±135 vs. 699±69 min*mmHg; p=0.37) between saline and epinephrine visits, respectively. Baroreflex sensitivity did not change during post‐infusion baselines (ΔDown‐Down =−2±1 vs. −2±2 ms/mmHg; saline vs. epinephrine, respectively; p=0.09). Baroreflex sensitivity was significantly reduced with LBNP (p<0.01 main effect of LBNP). There was no difference between the change in baroreflex sensitivity during LBNP with saline or epinephrine infusion (ΔDown‐Down =−14±4 vs. −8±4 ms/mmHg, p=0.17). Conclusions Consistent with previous work, spontaneous cardiac baroreflex sensitivity fell during LBNP. Contrary to our hypothesis, epinephrine infusion did not attenuate the fall in spontaneous cardiac baroreflex sensitivity observed during simulated blood loss. Because epinephrine did not alter the effect of LBNP on BRS, these data suggest that BRS may accurately reflect decompensation status during traumatic hemorrhage independent of elevated circulating epinephrine. Support or Funding Information US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Contract W81XWH‐13‐2‐0038

Due to the relationship between stroke volume (SV) and pulse pressure (PP) during lower body negative pressure (LBNP), we hypothesized that PP reflects SV during hemorrhage (HEM). After a 5‐minute baseline, 6 men were exposed to LBNP at ‐15, ‐30, and ‐45 mmHg for 5 minutes at each pressure. After 45 minutes of recovery, three progressive 333‐ml stages of HEM (1 L total) were performed. SV was assessed using a CC Nexfin and PP was calculated using an arterial catheter. SV (111 ± 2.1 vs. 77 ± 6.7 mL; p = 0.04) and PP (58±2.7 vs. 41 ± 4.3 mm Hg; p = 0.03) decreased from baseline to ‐45 mmHg LBNP. SV (118 ± 4.4 to 99 ± 6.8 mL; p = 0.06) and PP decreased (58 ± 2.9 to 48 ± 4.9 mmHg; p = 0.06) from baseline to ‐1 L of HEM. PP correlated with SV during HEM (amalgamated r 2 = 0.98) and LBNP (amalgamated r 2 = 0.99). There was limited inter‐subject variability in PP vs. SV during LBNP ( r 2 range 0.57 to 0.99, 5/6 had an r 2 >; 0.90), but substantial inter‐subject variability during HEM ( r 2 range 0.21 to 0.99, 2/6 had an r 2 >; 0.90). Reductions in PP induced by LBNP or HEM are strongly correlated with SV. However large inter‐individual differences in this correlation during HEM, which may indicate a significantly variable compensatory response in human arterial distensibility, may limit the use of PP as a surrogate for SV during clinical blood loss. Funded by U.S. Army MRMC Combat Casualty Care Research Program Grant # W81XWH‐11–1‐0823.

Background Lower body negative pressure (LBNP) increases carotid body chemosensitivity. Whether the increase in chemosensitivity is functionally significant in the hemodynamic response to LBNP was previously unknown. We tested the hypothesis that desensitization of the carotid body chemoreceptors would improve the hemodynamic response to LBNP. Methods Ten healthy, non‐obese male subjects (35 ± 3 years, BMI: 25 ± 1 kg/m 2 ) completed 2 study visits (Saline, Dopamine), separated by a minimum of 4 weeks. Intravenous dopamine was infused at an individualized dose (1–2 mg/kg/min) shown to maximally blunt the hypoxic ventilatory response (a measure of carotid body chemosensitivity). Arterial blood pressure (brachial catheter) and heart rate (ECG) were continuously recorded. On each study day subjects underwent step‐wise exposures of LBNP (−15, −30, and −45 mmHg) to simulate hemorrhage. Cumulative stress index (CSI) was calculated by summating the product of negative pressure (mmHg) by the time (min) during each LBNP level (−15, −30, and −45 mmHg). Results Dopamine tended to reduce CSI (Saline: 503 ± 52; Dopamine: 408 ± 45 mmHg*min; p=0.07). Changes in heart rate from baseline during graded LBNP were not statistically distinguishable between Saline and Dopamine conditions (− 15 mmHg: +4 ± 1 vs +3 ± 2 BPM, p=0.99; − 30 mmHg: +12 ± 1 vs +12 ± 3 BPM, p=0.99; − 45 mmHg: HR +21 ± 2 vs +19 ± 5 BPM, p=0.99). Similarly, change in systolic blood pressure from baseline during graded LBNP was not different between Saline and Dopamine conditions (− 15 mmHg: +1 ± 1 vs −1 ± 2 mmHg p=0.99; − 30 mmHg: −7 ± 3 vs −6 ± 4 mmHg, p=0.99; − 45 mmHg: −12 ± 4 vs −22 ± 6 mmHg, p=0.19). However, change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline during graded LBNP was higher at −45 mmHg between Saline and Dopamine conditions (− 15 mmHg: +2 ± 1 vs −0 ± 1 mmHg p=0.47; − 30 mmHg: −1 ± 2 vs −2 ± 2 mmHg p=0.26; − 45 mmHg: −2 ± 2 vs −12 ±3 mmHg, p=0.0004). Conclusions Desensitization of the carotid body chemoreceptors reduced diastolic blood pressure responses to LBNP at −45 mmHg only, with minimal effect at lower levels. These data suggest chemoreflex activity during LBNP may be functionally significant in the blood pressure responses only during higher levels of simulated hemorrhage. Support or Funding Information Funding: W81XWH‐13‐2‐0038 (DOD)

Hypovolemia‐induced sympathoexcitation might initiate an immune response through an increase in circulating epinephrine and splenic demargination. We tested the hypothesis that lower body negative pressure (LBNP) and blood loss (BL) result in comparable increases in white blood cell counts (WBCs). We determined WBCs and epinephrine levels in 12 men who performed a LBNP and BL protocol in a randomized order. LBNP consisted of 5‐minute stages at 0, ‐15, ‐30, and ‐45 mmHg of suction. BL included 5 minutes at baseline and following three stages of 333 mL of blood removal (up to 1000 mL total). Blood draws were performed at baseline and after the last stage of each protocol. LBNP to −45mmHg was a greater central hypovolemic stimulus vs. BL, therefore WBCs and epinephrine concentrations were plotted against central venous pressure (CVP) to obtain stimulus‐response relationships using the linear regression line slopes for both protocols. Paired tests were used to determine if the slopes of these regression lines fell on similar trajectories for each protocol. Mean regression line slopes fell on similar trajectories for total WBC (LBNP 183±46 vs. BL 155±109 mcL −1 *mmHg −1 , p=0.15), neutrophils (LBNP 110±29 vs. BL 96±72 mcL −1 *mmHg −1 , p=0.15) and lymphocytes (LBNP 65±21 vs. BL 59±38 mcL −1 *mmHg −1 , p=0.90). Mean regression line slopes for epinephrine were similar as well (LBNP 15±5 vs. BL 16±4 pg *mL −1 *mmHg −1 , p=0.84). Our results indicate that LBNP models the stimulus‐response relationship between CVP and WBCs observed during BL. Central hypovolemia, induced by LBNP or BL, elicits a relative leukocytosis with a predominantly neutrophil‐based response. Support or Funding Information US Army MRMC Combat Casualty Care Research Program Grant # W81XWH‐11‐1‐0823

Background Lower body negative pressure (LBNP) simulates hemorrhage, evoking compensatory cardiovascular mechanisms of increased heart rate (HR) while stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (CO) progressively decline, ultimately leading to presyncope. Previous work has shown that circulating levels of plasma epinephrine are elevated during LBNP; however, the role of early administration of epinephrine in compensatory cardiovascular mechanisms to simulated hemorrhage is not well understood. Purpose We hypothesized that during simulated hemorrhage, a low‐dose exogenous infusion of epinephrine in humans would: 1) augment HR response, 2) attenuate the decline of SV and CO, and 3) prolong time to tolerance. Methods Nine healthy subjects (5M/4F, 35±9yrs, BMI 25±1 kg·m −2 ) participated in LBNP on two separate study days. Protocols on each day consisted of a 10‐minute pre‐infusion baseline, 15‐minute infusion period (randomized to saline or epinephrine, dose = 0.1 μg·kg −1 ·min −1 , delivered through a peripherally inserted central catheter), 10‐minute post‐infusion baseline, and 5 minute stages of progressive LBNP with stepwise increases of 10–15 mmHg negative pressure until tolerance (systolic blood pressure less than 80 mmHg, bradycardia, or voluntary termination due to presyncopal symptoms). Heart rate (HR; electrocardiogram) and blood pressure (BP; radial arterial catheter) were recorded continuously. Cardiovascular function (HR, SV, CO, and systemic vascular resistance (SVR)) was determined using arterial waveform analysis. Data were analyzed via percent tolerance using repeated measures ANOVA with student method for pairwise comparisons. Results Infusion of exogenous epinephrine lowered MAP (p<0.01) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP; p<0.001), but raised systolic blood pressure (SBP; p=0.019) throughout all stages of LBNP. Epinephrine compared to saline augmented mean HR, SV and CO to the penultimate stage of LBNP (p≤0.01 for all cardiac measures) and concurrently reduced SVR (p=0.002). However, time to tolerance was not significantly different between epinephrine and saline conditions (1415 ± 79 vs. 1475 ± 150s, respectively; p=0.69). Discussion Our findings suggest that during simulated hemorrhage exogenous epinephrine can augment cardiac function without increasing tolerance to progressive central hypovolemia. During the epinephrine infusion, benefits to cardiac function may have been limited by reduced vascular resistance. Support or Funding Information The United States Department of Defense W81XWH‐13‐2‐0038

Background Maintaining baroreflex sensitivity is integral to ensuring blood pressure maintenance and end‐organ perfusion during hemorrhage. This is especially true under conditions of hypoxemia, where decreased tolerance to central hypovolemia is commonly observed. Hypoxia activates peripheral chemoreceptors and reduces baroreceptor‐vascular resistance reflex sensitivity. However, a direct role for the peripheral chemoreceptors in the hemodynamic response to hemorrhage in hypoxia remains unclear. Objective We tested the hypothesis that attenuation of peripheral chemoreceptor activity (low‐dose dopamine; 1–2 μg/kg/min) during acute hypoxia would promote maintenance of mean arterial pressure, pulse pressure, and other hemodynamic markers [heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), total peripheral resistance (TPR)] during simulated hemorrhage. Methods Ten healthy men (35±3 years, BMI 25±1 kg/m 2 ) participated in a randomized, double‐blind, placebo controlled study. Participants completed two experimental visits (saline and low‐dose dopamine) at which lower body negative pressure (LBNP) was conducted during hypoxia (SpO 2 ~85%; PaO2 ~52 mmHg) delivered via a non‐rebreather mask. Ventilation [V̇ (turbine transducer)], arterial blood pressure (brachial artery catheter), HR (ECG), and central venous pressure (peripherally inserted central catheter) were measured continuously and SV, CO, and TPR were calculated. Following a 5‐min rest, participants underwent LBNP for 5‐min at 3 intervals (−15, −30, and −45 mmHg). Outcome values were analyzed and compared using a mixed linear model (SAS PROC MIXED) with a direct product AR(1) covariance structure using indicator variables for saline vs. dopamine. Data from the mixed linear model are reported as an estimated change per 15 mmHg of LBNP. Results Dopamine had no effect on hypoxia P a O 2 , P a CO 2 , V̇ or respiratory rate (all P >0.05) and this relationship persisted throughout all LBNP stages. The mixed linear model showed no effect of dopamine vs. saline on changes in: central venous pressure (−1.1±0.4 vs −1.3±0.3 mmHg, P =0.15), mean arterial pressure (−4.7±2.3 vs −5.3±1.4 mmHg, P =0.25), pulse pressure (−6.7±1.5 vs −8.3±1.4 mmHg, P =0.50), HR (7.8±1.5 vs 6.1±1.5 bpm, P =0.41), SV (−10.9±1.9 vs −11.6±3.3 mL, P =0.41), CO (−0.3±0.2 vs −0.4±0.4 L · min −1 , P =0.31) or TPR (0.2±0.4 vs 0.7±0.6 mmHg · L · min −1 P =0.27). Discussion Intravenous infusion of low‐dose dopamine designed to attenuate peripheral chemoreflex activity during acute hypoxia did not alter the integrated hemodynamic response to simulated hemorrhage. Our data suggests that peripheral chemoreceptors have a limited role during hypoxic central hypovolemia. More research is needed to understand the sensitivity and cross‐talk between chemoreceptors and baroreceptors during hemorrhage. Support or Funding Information Funding: W81XWH‐13‐2‐0038 (DOD), DK90541 (NIH), UL1 TR000135 (NIH).

Objectives We aimed to determine if epinephrine played a beneficial role on middle cerebral artery velocity (MCAv) during physiologically stressful stimuli prior to cardiovascular collapse. MCAv was assessed during lower body negative pressure (LBNP) under conditions of a saline or epinephrine infusion. We hypothesized that (1) epinephrine would augment the change in MCAv from baseline to LBNP tolerance, (2), epinephrine would increase MCAv for a given LBNP stimulus, (3) at a given percent of LBNP tolerance epinephrine and saline will be similar and (4) that epinephrine would improve LBNP tolerance. Methods Nine participants (35±9yrs, n=5 male, 4 female) underwent a LBNP protocol to physiological tolerance during two study visits, performed at least two weeks apart, and randomized to saline or epinephrine (dose=0.1μg/kg/min) infusions (peripherally‐ inserted central catheter). Blood pressure (radial artery catheter) and middle cerebral artery velocity (transcranial Doppler) were assessed. MCAv and cerebrovascular conductance index (CvCi) were analyzed during baseline (three minutes), physiological tolerance (one minute), during LBNP at a given stimulus (three minutes; −15, −30, −45 mmHg of LBNP), and during relative percentages of LBNP tolerance [three minutes; 20, 40, 60, and 80% of LBNP tolerance time (s)]. Baseline was defined as measures taken after 15 minutes of saline or epinephrine infusion. Results In both saline and epinephrine conditions, MCAv and CvCi decreased from baseline to tolerance (Saline MCAv: 69.7±7.5 vs 44.9±4.9 cm/s, p<0.05; Epinephrine MCAv: 80.9±5.9 vs 56.5±6.7 cm/s, p<0.05; Saline CvCi: 0.69±0.06 vs 0.58±0.067 cm/s/mmHg, p>0.05; Epinephrine CvCi: 0.80±0.06 vs 0.70±0.078 cm/s/mmHg, p<0.05). Epinephrine augmented MCAv at a given LBNP stimulus from baseline to −15, −30, and −45 mmHg (MCAv: Treatment effect: p<0.05; CvCi: Treatment effect: p=0.05). At a relative percent of LBNP tolerance, epinephrine increased MCAv, but when blood pressure was controlled for with CvCi there was no treatment effect between epinephrine and saline (MCAv: Treatment effect: p<0.05; CvCi: Treatment effect: p>0.05). Time to tolerance was not significantly different between saline and epinephrine conditions (1469±168 vs. 1445±82s, p=0.88). Conclusions Epinephrine increased MCAv during LBNP. These data suggest that epinephrine plays a beneficial role during stressful physiological stimuli such as hemorrhage in humans by augmenting cerebral blood flow prior to cardiovascular collapse. However, epinephrine did not improve LBNP tolerance. Support or Funding Information The United States Department of Defense W81XWH‐13‐2‐0038

Based on evidence extracted from a cross-sectional review of the literature, we sought to advance a novel conceptual framework that the physiology of hemorrhagic shock from exsanguination and maximal oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]O 2 max), induced by physical exercise, shares key common features. As such, this review focuses on the notion that intolerance to inadequate oxygen delivery (DO 2 ) resulting from associated states of hypovolemia appears to be a common physiological link that “connects” hemorrhagic shock to the physiology that limits maximal aerobic capacity. Our approach focuses on the similarities in a complex cascade of cardiopulmonary, metabolic and autonomic compensatory responses during hemorrhage and maximal physical exertion that ultimately function to avoid critical levels of DO 2 (DO 2crit ) and are manifested by elevation in blood lactate levels. We introduce a paradigm of absolute (i.e. hemorrhage) versus relative (i.e. exercise) hypovolemia as a primary physiological factor that contributes to reaching DO 2crit , and define the concept of “O 2 deficit” to replace the clinical concept of O 2 debt. Using the peer-reviewed literature, we provide human data obtained from patients who suffered hemorrhagic shock from severe blood loss and compare it to healthy subjects who performed maximal exercise. We include a novel conceptual framework of the continuum of metabolic relationship between DO 2 and [Formula: see text]O 2 that is manifested as the final step during both progressive blood loss leading to hemorrhagic shock and at [Formula: see text]O 2 max. We present evidence to support the contribution of utilizing “O 2 extraction reserve” as the initial mechanism for developing an O 2 deficit, and the notion of individual variability in compensatory responses. In the absence of reversing inadequate DO 2 , an increased reliance on O 2 extraction reserve, cellular anaerobic glycolysis, and phosphocreatine stores to supplement the energy required by the tissues for normal function will deplete a finite capacity for compensation. In the end, acidity reflected by a blood pH ≤ ∼7.0 leads to disturbance of normal cell functioning of metabolic machinery manifested by irreversible shock in the case of hemorrhage or physical exhaustion when [Formula: see text]O 2 max is reached. Impact statement Disturbance of normal homeostasis occurs when oxygen delivery and energy stores to the body’s tissues fail to meet the energy requirement of cells. The work submitted in this review is important because it advances the understanding of inadequate oxygen delivery as it relates to early diagnosis and treatment of circulatory shock and its relationship to disturbance of normal functioning of cellular metabolism in life-threatening conditions of hemorrhage. We explored data from the clinical and exercise literature to construct for the first time a conceptual framework for defining the limitation of inadequate delivery of oxygen by comparing the physiology of hemorrhagic shock caused by severe blood loss to maximal oxygen uptake induced by intense physical exercise. We also provide a translational framework in which understanding the fundamental relationship between the body’s reserve to compensate for conditions of inadequate oxygen delivery as a limiting factor to [Formula: see text]O 2 max helps to re-evaluate paradigms of triage for improved monitoring of accurate resuscitation in patients suffering from hemorrhagic shock.

New Findings What is the central question of this study? Is lower body negative pressure a useful surrogate to study white blood cell responses to haemorrhage in humans? What is the main finding and its importance? We found that lower body negative pressure appears to be a useful surrogate to study the early white blood cell mobilization response during blood loss. Hypovolaemia has been associated with an immune response that might be secondary to sympathoexcitation. We tested the hypothesis that simulated hypovolaemia using lower body negative pressure (LBNP) and real hypovolaemia induced via experimental blood loss (BL) cause similar increases in the white blood cell concentration ([WBC]). We measured [WBC] and catecholamine concentrations in 12 men who underwent an LBNP and a BL protocol in a randomized order. We compared 45 mmHg of LBNP with 1000 ml of BL; therefore, [WBC] and catecholamine concentrations were plotted against central venous pressure to obtain stimulus–response relationships using the linear regression line slopes for both protocols. Mean regression line slopes were similar for total [WBC] (LBNP 183 ± 4 μl−1 mmHg−1 versus BL 155 ± 109 μl−1 mmHg−1, P = 0.15), neutrophils (LBNP 110 ± 2 μl−1 mmHg−1 versus BL 96 ± 72 μl−1 mmHg−1, P = 0.15) and lymphocytes (LBNP 65 ± 21 μl−1 mmHg−1 versus BL 59 ± 38 μl−1 mmHg−1, P = 0.90). Mean regression line slopes for adrenaline were similar (LBNP 15 ± 5 pg ml−1 mmHg−1 versus BL 16 ± 4 pg ml−1 mmHg−1, P = 0.84) and were steeper during LBNP for noradrenaline (LBNP 28 ± 6 pg ml−1 mmHg−1 versus BL 9 ± 6 pg ml−1 mmHg−1, P = 0.01). These data indicate that central hypovolaemia elicits a relative leucocytosis with a predominantly neutrophil‐based response. Additionally, our results indicate that LBNP models the stimulus–response relationship between central venous pressure and [WBC] observed during BL.