Bergsagel, P. Leif

Abstract Maintaining results of successful induction therapy is an important goal in multiple myeloma. Here, members of the International Myeloma Working Group review the relevant data. Thalidomide maintenance therapy after autologous stem cell transplantation improved the quality of response and increased progression-free survival (PFS) significantly in all 6 studies and overall survival (OS) in 3 of them. In elderly patients, 2 trials showed a significant prolongation of PFS, but no improvement in OS. A meta-analysis revealed a significant risk reduction for PFS/event-free survival and death. The role of thalidomide maintenance after melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide is not well established. Two trials with lenalidomide maintenance treatment after autologous stem cell transplantation and one study after conventional melphalan, prednisone, and lenalidomide induction therapy showed a significant risk reduction for PFS and an increase in OS in one of the transplant trials. Maintenance therapy with single-agent bortezomib or in combination with thalidomide or prednisone has been studied. One trial revealed a significantly increased OS with a bortezomib-based induction and bortezomib maintenance therapy compared with conventional induction and thalidomide maintenance treatment. Maintenance treatment can be associated with significant side effects, and none of the drugs evaluated is approved for maintenance therapy. Treatment decisions for individual patients must balance potential benefits and risks carefully, as a widely agreed-on standard is not established.

Abstract Routine incorporation of FISH into multiple myeloma (MM) diagnostic testing has led to a better appreciation of the heterogeneity of genetic abnormalities associated with this disease. We studied a group of 484 patients with newly diagnosed symptomatic MM to better understand the prevalence of the various abnormalities and the prognostic significance of the overlapping abnormalities. A translocation involving the IgH locus and 1 of the 5 recurrent partner chromosomes was seen in 161 (33%) patients, and 275 (57%) had trisomy of at least 1 odd-numbered chromosome. High-risk FISH, defined as the presence of t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), or loss of P53, was seen in 115 (24%) patients; the median overall survival for this group was 3.9 years, compared with “not reached” for standard-risk patients (P < .001). Among the patients with high-risk FISH, 49 patients who also had at least 1 trisomy had a median overall survival that was not reached, compared with 3 years for high-risk patients without a concurrent trisomy (P = .01). Based on the current findings, we conclude that the presence of trisomies in patients with t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), or p53 deletion abnormalities in MM ameliorates the usual adverse impact associated with these prognostic markers.

Abstract Multiple myeloma (MM) is malignancy of isotype-switched, BM-localized plasma cells that frequently results in bone destruction, BM failure, and death. Important molecular subgroups are identified by three classes of recurrent immunoglobulin gene translocations and hyperdiploidy, both of which affect disease course. From a clinical standpoint, it is critical to identify MM patients carrying the t(4;14) translocation, which is present in 15% of myelomas and is associated with dysregulation of WHSC1/MMSET and often FGFR3. These patients should all receive bortezomib as part of their initial induction treatment because this has been shown to significantly prolong survival. In contrast, patients with translocations affecting the MAF family of transcription factors, del17p, or gene-expression profiling (GEP)–defined high-risk disease appear to have a worse prognosis that is not dramatically improved by any intervention. These patients should be enrolled in innovative clinical trials. The remaining patients with cyclin D translocations or hyperdiploidy do well with most therapies, and the goal should be to control disease while minimizing toxicity.

Abstract The precise molecular mechanism of action and targets through which thalidomide and related immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) exert their antitumor effects remains unclear. We investigated the role of cereblon (CRBN), a primary teratogenic target of thalidomide, in the antimyeloma activity of IMiDs. CRBN depletion is initially cytotoxic to human myeloma cells, but surviving cells with stable CRBN depletion become highly resistant to both lenalidomide and pomalidomide, but not to the unrelated drugs bortezomib, dexamethasone, and melphalan. Acquired deletion of CRBN was found to be the primary genetic event differentiating isogenic MM1.S cell lines cultured to be sensitive or resistant to lenalidomide and pomalidomide. Gene expression changes induced by lenalidomide were dramatically suppressed in the presence of CRBN depletion, further demonstrating that CRBN is required for lenalidomide activity. Downstream targets of CRBN include interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4) previously reported to also be a target of lenalidomide. Patients exposed to, and putatively resistant to, lenalidomide had lower CRBN levels in paired samples before and after therapy. In summary, CRBN is an essential requirement for IMiD activity and a possible biomarker for the clinical assessment of antimyeloma efficacy.

Abstract In this Perspective, we summarize some of the most contentious issues surrounding diagnosis and treatment of myeloma. We outline how a fundamental clash of philosophies, cure versus control, may be at the heart of many of the controversies. From the very definition of the disease to risk stratification to the validity of current clinical trial endpoints, we highlight the major areas of debate and provide alternative viewpoints that have implications for trial design and interpretation, as well as clinical practice.

Abstract Interactions between the malignant plasma cells of multiple myeloma and stromal cells within the bone marrow microenvironment are essential for myeloma cell survival, mirroring the same dependence of normal bone marrow-resident long-lived plasma cells on specific marrow niches. These interactions directly transduce prosurvival signals to the myeloma cells and also induce niche production of supportive soluble factors. However, despite their central importance, the specific molecular and cellular components involved remain poorly characterized. We now report that the prototypic T cell costimulatory receptor CD28 is overexpressed on myeloma cells during disease progression and in the poor-prognosis subgroups and plays a previously unrecognized role as a two-way molecular bridge to support myeloid stromal cells in the microenvironment. Engagement by CD28 to its ligand CD80/CD86 on stromal dendritic cell directly transduces a prosurvival signal to myeloma cell, protecting it against chemotherapy and growth factor withdrawal-induced death. Simultaneously, CD28-mediated ligation of CD80/CD86 induces the stromal dendritic cell to produce the prosurvival cytokine IL-6 (involving novel cross-talk with the Notch pathway) and the immunosuppressive enzyme IDO. These findings identify CD28 and CD80/CD86 as important molecular components of the interaction between myeloma cells and the bone marrow microenvironment, point to similar interaction for normal plasma cells, and suggest novel therapeutic strategies to target malignant and pathogenic (e.g., in allergy and autoimmunity) plasma cells.

Abstract Pomalidomide at doses of 2 or 4 mg/d has demonstrated excellent activity in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). We opened 2 sequential phase 2 trials using the pomalidomide with weekly dexamethasone (Pom/dex) regimen at differing doses to study the efficacy of this regimen in patients who have failed both lenalidomide and bortezomib. Pomalidomide was given orally 2 or 4 mg daily with dexamethasone 40 mg weekly. Thirty-five patients were enrolled in each cohort. Confirmed responses in the 2-mg cohort consisted of very good partial response (VGPR) in 5 (14%), partial response (PR) in 4 (11%), minor response (MR) in 8 (23%) for an overall response rate of 49%. In the 4-mg cohort, confirmed responses consisted of complete response (CR) in 1 (3%), VGPR in 3 (9%), PR in 6 (17%), MR in 5 (14%) for an overall response rate of 43%. Overall survival at 6 months is 78% and 67% in the 2- and 4-mg cohort, respectively. Myelosuppression was the most common toxicity. This nonrandomized data suggests no advantage for 4 mg over the 2 mg daily. Pomalidomide overcomes resistance in myeloma refractory to both lenalidomide and bortezomib. This trial is registered at http://ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00558896.

AbstractThe role of high-dose therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) continues to evolve in the novel agent era. The choice of induction therapy has moved from conventional chemotherapy to newer regimens incorporating the immunomodulatory derivatives thalidomide or lenalidomide and the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib. These drugs combine well with traditional therapies and with one another to form various doublet, triplet, and quadruplet regimens. Up-front use of these induction treatments, in particular 3-drug combinations, has affected unprecedented rates of complete response that rival those previously seen with conventional chemotherapy and subsequent ASCT. Autotransplantation applied after novel-agent-based induction regimens provides further improvement in the depth of response, a gain that translates into extended progression-free survival and, potentially, overall survival. High activity shown by immunomodulatory derivatives and bortezomib before ASCT has recently led to their use as consolidation and maintenance therapies after autotransplantation. Novel agents and ASCT are complementary treatment strategies for MM. This article reviews the current literature and provides important perspectives and guidance on the major issues surrounding the optimal current management of younger, transplantation-eligible MM patients.

Abstract The plasma cell malignancy Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a rare but deadly form of cancer with 5 year survival rates of ∼30%. The disease exacts an especially heavy burden on African American (AA) patients. In fact, African Americans are twice a likely to be diagnosed with and die from MM as compared to Caucasian Americans. Although socio-economic factors likely influence this disparity, the role of biology has not been ruled out. We have profiled ∼250 MM tumors for somatic copy number alterations using array-based Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) and Gene Expression Profiling as part of the Multiple Myeloma Genomics Initiative. To determine if somatic alterations may play a role in the disparity in incidence and/or severity of MM in AA, we compared the frequency of specific chromosomal aberrations in genes and genomic regions previously found to be involved in progression and poor outcome in MM among a cohort of one hundred ninety-six (196) patients including 16 African Americans and 180 Caucasians. The frequency of occurrence (expressed as a percentage) was determined for each of the following aberrations: 1p deletion, homozygous deletion of p18, chromosome 13 deletion, and chromosome 13 monosomy. No significant difference was detected in the frequency of chromosome 13 deletion and chromosome 13 monosomy between the two groups. However, significant differences were observed for chromosome 1p alterations. Homozygous deletion at the p18 locus at 1p occurred in 12.5% (2/16) of tumors from AA patients and 2.8% (5/180) of CA patient tumors (p = 0.045). We further stratified tumors by hyperdiploid or non-hyperdiploid status using a-CGH profiles to determine ploidy status. Most significantly, p18 homozygous deletion was found in 25% (2/8) of AA patients with non-hyperdiploid tumors and in only 1.2% (1/83) of CA patients with non-hyperdiploid tumors (p=3.2 × 10-4). A nominally significant difference among non-hyperdiploid patients was also present for overall 1p deletion, which was observed in 2/8 (25%) of AA non-hyperdiploid tumors and 33/83 (40%) of CA with non-hyperdiploid tumors (p=0.05). No differences were observed for 1p deletion or p18 homozygous deletion among hyperdiploid tumors between AA and CA patients. These results suggest that deletions at 1p are more common among African American MM patients. Furthermore, homozygous deletion encompassing the p18 locus is more significantly common among AA MM patients, especially AA patients with non-hyperdiploid tumors. As 1p deletion and p18 homozygous deletion have been linked to poor outcome, our results suggest that the increased frequency of these alterations in tumors from AA patients may in part explain the disparity in unfavorable outcomes seen among AA MM patients Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4822.

Abstract Microarray technologies are powerful assays, which can identify copy-number abnormalities (CNA) underlying the pathogenesis of cancer. Several commercial arrays are available but it is unclear which is the best platform. We did a side-by-side comparison between two leading arrays; the Affymetrix SNP6 and Agilent 1M, to compare data compression, noise, gene and exon coverage, and CNA detection. Five samples were run on both platforms and analyzed as recommended by the manufacturer. We first performed an in silico comparison to define the number of probes per serial 5k interval, number of probes per gene and exon, and the coefficient of variation of different smoothing windows. Comparing the CV of the two arrays showed a similar level of variation between a 3 and 5 probe averaging on the 1M and SNP6, respectively. Using these smoothing levels the 1M interrogates 81.2% of the genes in the genome compared to 69.3% on the SNP6. At the exon level the 1M has at least one probe in 64.8% compared to 41.2% on the SNP6. We observed a similar level of data compression (∼10%) on the two arrays but the SNP6 had nearly twice the noise (SD 0.38 versus 0.21). Finally, there was a marked increment in the number of CNA identified by 1M (mean of 78.5) than SNP6.0 (59.5). In this comparison the Agilent 1M out performed the Affymetrix SNP6. Even with half the number of probes, the 1M was superior in CNA detection, gene/exon coverage and showed less signal variation. A comparison with previous platforms showed that these two arrays did not identify new gene amplifications but did detect new deletions, however, neither platform detected several known deletions detected by other methods. Therefore, we designed a custom, exon-centered, 2×400K array (Agilent) with the goal of identifying additional deletions. The design outline was: a) all the probes from the Agilent CGH 44K array; b) 3 probes per exon across the human exome; c) high resolution tiling of 1450 cancer implicated genes; and d) tiling the 4kb flanking all MIRs. To improve performance, we only included probes with performance scores higher than 0.8 and 0.85 in queries b) and c), respectively. Lastly, 15000 probes from the 1M array that map to exons missed by our design parameters were also included. Our custom array has half the probes (415K) of the 1M (960K) and 4.5x less than the SNP6 (1.85M) but shows the best gene and exon coverage. When the minimum number of probes needed for calculating a CNA is considered, 86% of genes are interrogated compared to 81.2% (1M) and 69.3% (SNP6). The difference is even more marked at the exon level with 84% covered by at least one probe and at least 63.2% interrogated by two probes compared to 5.3% (1M) and 18.0% (SNP6). The promising in silico comparison of this exon-centered array, its more stringent design parameters in combination with significantly reducing the cost per run should make this a very promising array design for CNA analysis of tumor samples in the future Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4957.