Interim Analyses of the MMRC Reference Collection Identifies Recurrent Genomic-Level Events in Multiple Myeloma and Demonstrates That CDKN2C/p18 Deletion Is the Pre-Eminent Copy Number Alteration in Poor Prognosis Disease
Abstract The Multiple Myeloma Research Consortium (MMRC) Genomics Initiative was instigated to harness the power of multiple genomic approaches to further the understanding of multiple myeloma. To date, 137 samples from patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed myeloma (out of an estimated final total of 250 by the end of the year) have been subjected to expression profiling and array comparative genomic hybridization. To identify regions of recurrent copy number alteration with a high degree of confidence, we have used the Genomic Identification of Significant Targets In Cancer (GISTIC) algorithm, which detects such regions and assigns a probability to each. Application of GISTIC to the MMRC collection identified 14 significant regions of amplification and 15 significant regions of deletion. The algorithm further detects peaks of copy number change that contribute to each region’s significance. Of genes that were expressed in our dataset, a total of 64 across the genome were found to lie within the boundaries of significant amplification peaks and 30 were found to lie within significant deletion peaks. Given the likelihood that this gene collection is highly enriched for genes important in the pathogenesis of myeloma and potential therapeutic targets, it has been prioritized for further validation with the amplified genes submitted for arrayed RNAi and the deleted genes expedited for re-sequencing. In order to define a poor prognosis group, we developed and applied a model based on the gene expression dataset of Shaughnessy and colleagues. To identify pathways activated in poor prognosis disease, we applied Gene Set Enrichment Analysis with the Molecular Signatures Database. This demonstrated enrichment of multiple canonical pathways within the poor prognosis group, including those associated with proliferation, cell cycle progression and DNA repair. A search for recurrent copy number events associated with poor prognosis disease revealed that by far the most significant event, and the only one surviving correction for multiple hypothesis testing, was mono- or bi-allelic deletion of CDKN2C (p18). Interestingly, the poor prognosis group also demonstrated higher expression of p18 in those samples without bi-allelic deletion and of CDKN2A (p16). Deletion and increased expression of p18 in high proliferation index myeloma samples has previously been described. However, our analyses demonstrate the pre-eminence of p18 loss for defining poor prognosis disease compared to other recurrent copy number changes. Furthermore, it expands on work in other tumors demonstrating feedback mechanisms between cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor pathways, suggesting a more complex model of interplay between the pathways than previously described. In conclusion, the MMRC reference collection is proving an important tool in the fight to understand key genetic events in multiple myeloma and would ultimately be anticipated to contribute towards development of improved therapy for the disease.
HOXA9 Is a Novel Therapeutic Target in Multiple Myeloma.
Abstract Abstract 832 We hypothesized that new therapeutic targets for multiple myeloma (MM) could be discovered through the integrative computational analysis of genomic data. Accordingly, we generated gene expression profiling and copy number data on 250 clinically-annotated MM patient samples. Utilizing an outlier statistical approach, we identified HOXA9 as the top candidate gene for further investigation. HOXA9 expression was particularly high in patients lacking canonical MM chromosomal translocations, and allele-specific expression analysis suggested that this overexpression was mono-allelic. Indeed, focal copy number amplifications at the HOXA locus were observed in some patients. Outlier HOXA9 expression was further validated in both a collection of 52 MM cell lines and 414 primary patient samples previously described. To further verify the aberrant expression of HOXA9 in MM, we performed quantitative RT-PCR, which confirmed expression in all MM patients and cell lines tested, with high-level expression in a subset. To further investigate the mechanism of aberrant HOXA9 expression, we interrogated the pattern of histone modification at the HOXA locus because HOXA gene expression is particularly regulated by such chromatin marks. Accordingly, immunoprecipitation studies showed an aberrantly low level of histone 3 lysine 27 trimethylation marks (H3K27me3) at the HOXA9 locus. H3K27me3 modification is normally associated with silencing of HOXA9 in normal B-cell development. As such, it appears likely that the aberrant expression of HOXA9 in MM is due at least in part to defects in histone modification at this locus. To determine the functional consequences of HOXA9 expression in MM, we performed RNAi-mediated knock-down experiments in MM cell lines. Seven independent HOXA9 shRNAs that diminished HOXA9 expression resulted in growth inhibition of 12/14 MM cell lines tested. Taken together, these experiments indicate that HOXA9 is essential for survival of MM cells, and that the mechanism of HOXA9 expression relates to aberrant histone modification at the HOXA9 locus. The data thus suggest that HOXA9 is an attractive new therapeutic target for MM. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Abstract 4822: Analysis of somatic copy number alterations associated with poor prognosis and progression of multiple myeloma in African Americans
Abstract The plasma cell malignancy Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a rare but deadly form of cancer with 5 year survival rates of ∼30%. The disease exacts an especially heavy burden on African American (AA) patients. In fact, African Americans are twice a likely to be diagnosed with and die from MM as compared to Caucasian Americans. Although socio-economic factors likely influence this disparity, the role of biology has not been ruled out. We have profiled ∼250 MM tumors for somatic copy number alterations using array-based Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) and Gene Expression Profiling as part of the Multiple Myeloma Genomics Initiative. To determine if somatic alterations may play a role in the disparity in incidence and/or severity of MM in AA, we compared the frequency of specific chromosomal aberrations in genes and genomic regions previously found to be involved in progression and poor outcome in MM among a cohort of one hundred ninety-six (196) patients including 16 African Americans and 180 Caucasians. The frequency of occurrence (expressed as a percentage) was determined for each of the following aberrations: 1p deletion, homozygous deletion of p18, chromosome 13 deletion, and chromosome 13 monosomy. No significant difference was detected in the frequency of chromosome 13 deletion and chromosome 13 monosomy between the two groups. However, significant differences were observed for chromosome 1p alterations. Homozygous deletion at the p18 locus at 1p occurred in 12.5% (2/16) of tumors from AA patients and 2.8% (5/180) of CA patient tumors (p = 0.045). We further stratified tumors by hyperdiploid or non-hyperdiploid status using a-CGH profiles to determine ploidy status. Most significantly, p18 homozygous deletion was found in 25% (2/8) of AA patients with non-hyperdiploid tumors and in only 1.2% (1/83) of CA patients with non-hyperdiploid tumors (p=3.2 × 10-4). A nominally significant difference among non-hyperdiploid patients was also present for overall 1p deletion, which was observed in 2/8 (25%) of AA non-hyperdiploid tumors and 33/83 (40%) of CA with non-hyperdiploid tumors (p=0.05). No differences were observed for 1p deletion or p18 homozygous deletion among hyperdiploid tumors between AA and CA patients. These results suggest that deletions at 1p are more common among African American MM patients. Furthermore, homozygous deletion encompassing the p18 locus is more significantly common among AA MM patients, especially AA patients with non-hyperdiploid tumors. As 1p deletion and p18 homozygous deletion have been linked to poor outcome, our results suggest that the increased frequency of these alterations in tumors from AA patients may in part explain the disparity in unfavorable outcomes seen among AA MM patients Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4822.
Abstract B64: Analysis of somatic copy number alterations among African American patients with multiple myeloma using array CGH
Abstract Multiple myeloma (MM) is a cancer of the plasma cells in the bone marrow. Although rare, MM is a deadly form of cancer with a 5 year survival rate of only 37%. African Americans (AA) are twice as likely to be diagnosed with and die from MM as compared to European Americans (EA). Socioeconomic factors may contribute to this disparity, however, biological factors may also be an influence. We have identified somatic copy number alterations in MM as a part of the Multiple Myeloma Genomics Initiative by profiling 250 MM tumors using array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). Using this cohort, we identified 16 African American and 180 European American patients using a MMRC database that indicated the racial demographics of each patient. To determine if somatic alterations may play a role in the disparity in incidence and/or severity of MM in AA, we compared the frequency of specific chromosomal aberrations in genes and genomic regions found to be involved in progression and poor outcome. The number of events of occurring was calculated and a univariate analysis was conducted using the Fisher's exact test. P-values were used to determine statistical significance. Results revealed significant differences for chromosome 1 p alterations. Specifically, homozygous deletion at the p18 locus at 1 p occurred in 12.5% (2/16) of tumors from AA patients and 2.8% (5/180) of EA patient tumors (p = 0.045). Further stratification of tumors by hyperdiploid or non-hyperdiploid status revealed significant differences in p18 homozygous deletion. Homozygous deletion of p18 was found in 25% (2/8) of AA patients and only 1.2% (1/83) of EA patients with non-hyperdiploid tumors (p=3.2 × 10-4). A nominally significant difference among non-hyperdiploid patients was also present for overall 1 p deletion, which was observed in 2/8 (25%) of AA non-hyperdiploid tumors and 33/83 (40%) of EA with non-hyperdiploid tumors (p=0.05). No differences were observed for 1 p deletion or p18 homozygous deletion among hyperdiploid tumors between AA and EA patients. We then combined our AA dataset with an independent dataset of 8 AA MM patients generated at the Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale AZ and repeated the analysis. Interestingly, very little or no aberrations were found in the dataset from the Mayo Clinic, however, differences of p18 homozygous deletion and 16q deletion among AA and EA remained statistically significant. To determine the correlation between hemizygous and biallelic loss of p18 and poor prognosis we used the 70 gene signature (Shaughnessy, et al., 2007) as a surrogate to identify patients with poor prognosis within the Multiple Myeloma Genomics Initiative dataset. Genomic identification of significant targets in cancer (GISTIC) was used (Beroukhim et al., 2007) to identify regions of aberrant copy number that were over-represented among samples. A relationship between poor prognosis and biallelic loss was found to be statistically significant (p = 0002) while samples with hemizygous loss showed no relationship (p = 0.57). Although the size of the current AA cohort is small, these results suggest that homozygous deletions at the p18 locus may be more common among African American MM patients with non-hyperdiploid tumors which may help to explain the disparity in AA patients with MM. Array CGH is currently being conducted on an additional 40 tumors from AA MM patients for a more robust analysis. Citation Information: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010;19(10 Suppl):B64.