Gich, Ignasi

AbstractTo describe the clinical outcomes and risk factors for 90‐day mortality in patients with solid tumours (ST) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) during the first outbreak in Catalonia. This is a multicentre retrospective study including adults with ST and COVID‐19 confirmed by real time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction between 13 March and 30 April 2020. Clinical and survival data were collected. Follow‐up ended on 30 July 2020. Multivariate and survival analysis were performed. A hundred and fifteen patients were included. In all, 42.6% had advanced disease and were receiving anticancer treatment; 7% were admitted to the ICU and 22.6% died during hospitalisation. Thirty‐day mortality was 27.8%, which increased to 33.9% at 90 days. Ninety‐day mortality was associated with current smoker status (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.91, 95% CI [confidence interval]: 1.03‐8.33, P = .044), baseline ECOG‐PS 2 to 3 (HR: 3.88, 95% CI: 1.77‐8.46, P < .001]), dyspnoea (HR: 3.02, 95% CI: 1.31‐6.96, P = .009), a respiratory rate ≥ 24 (HR: 2.24, 95% CI: 1.02‐4.92, P = .046) and sepsis (HR: 3.97, 95% CI: 1.78‐8.88, P < .001). Of the 76 survivors, 73.6% had a follow‐up visit. Of those, 33.9% had their cancer controlled and 23.2% had progressed. Thirty‐five survivors were receiving anticancer treatment before COVID‐19 diagnosis though 14 had to discontinue the treatment. Eight survivors without previous anticancer therapy started therapy. The median time to start anticancer therapy after COVID‐19 was 45 days (interquartile range: 28‐61). In conclusion, 90‐day mortality in patients with ST and COVID‐19 was 33.9%; current smoker status, poor ECOG‐PS, dyspnoea, respiratory rate ≥24 and sepsis were independent risk factors for mortality; and survivors did not restart their anticancer treatment until 1.5 months after COVID‐19 diagnosis.

AbstractBackgroundExploration of values and preferences in the context of anticoagulation therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF) remains limited. To better characterize the distribution of patient and physician values and preferences relevant to decisions regarding anticoagulation in patients with AF, we conducted interviews with patients at risk of developing AF and physicians who manage patients with AF.MethodsWe interviewed 96 outpatients and 96 physicians in a multicenter study and elicited the maximal increased risk of bleeding (threshold risk) that respondents would tolerate with warfarin vs. aspirin to achieve a reduction in three strokes in 100 patients over a 2‐year period. We used the probabilistic version of the threshold technique.ResultsThe median threshold risk for both patients and physicians was 10 additional bleeds (10 P = 0.7). In both groups, we observed large variability in the threshold number of bleeds, with wider variability in patients than clinicians [patient range: 0–100, physician range: 0–50]. We observed one cluster of patients and physicians who would tolerate <10 bleeds and another cluster of patients, but not physicians, who would accept more than 35.ConclusionsOur findings suggest wide variability in patient and physician values and preferences regarding the trade‐off between strokes and bleeds. Results suggest that in individual decision making, physician and patient values and preferences will often be discordant; this mandates tailoring treatment to the individual patient's preferences.