Hines, Edie M.

Abstract Allergen provocation of allergic asthma patients is often characterized by an initial period of bronchoconstriction, or early phase reaction (EPR), that leads to maximal airway narrowing within 15–30 min, followed by a recovery period returning airway function to baseline within 1–2 h. In this study, we used a defined OVA provocation model and mice deficient for specific leukocyte populations to investigate the cellular/molecular origins of the EPR. OVA-sensitized/challenged wild-type (C57BL/6J) mice displayed an EPR following OVA provocation. However, this response was absent in gene knockout animals deficient of either B or T cells. Moreover, transfer of OVA-specific IgG, but not IgE, before the OVA provocation, was capable of inducing the EPR in both strains of lymphocyte-deficient mice. Interestingly, an EPR was also observed in sensitized/challenged mast cell-deficient mice following an OVA provocation. These data show that the EPR in the mouse is an immunologically based pathophysiological response that requires allergen-specific IgG but occurs independent of mast cell activities. Thus, in the mouse the initial period of bronchoconstriction following allergen exposure may involve neither mast cells nor IgE-mediated events.

Abstract Asthma and mouse models of allergic respiratory inflammation are invariably associated with a pulmonary eosinophilia; however, this association has remained correlative. In this report, a causative relationship between eosinophils and allergen-provoked pathologies was established using eosinophil adoptive transfer. Eosinophils were transferred directly into the lungs of either naive or OVA-treated IL-5−/− mice. This strategy resulted in a pulmonary eosinophilia equivalent to that observed in OVA-treated wild-type animals. A concomitant consequence of this eosinophil transfer was an increase in Th2 bronchoalveolar lavage cytokine levels and the restoration of intracellular epithelial mucus in OVA-treated IL-5−/− mice equivalent to OVA-treated wild-type levels. Moreover, the transfer also resulted in the development of airway hyperresponsiveness. These pulmonary changes did not occur when eosinophils were transferred into naive IL-5−/− mice, eliminating nonspecific consequences of the eosinophil transfer as a possible explanation. Significantly, administration of OVA-treated IL-5−/− mice with GK1.5 (anti-CD4) Abs abolished the increases in mucus accumulation and airway hyperresponsiveness following adoptive transfer of eosinophils. Thus, CD4+ T cell-mediated inflammatory signals as well as signals derived from eosinophils are each necessary, yet alone insufficient, for the development of allergic pulmonary pathology. These data support an expanded view of T cell and eosinophil activities and suggest that eosinophil effector functions impinge directly on lung function.