Botha, Hugo

Background and purposeThe non‐fluent/agrammatic variant of primary progressive aphasia (agPPA) is a heterogeneous diagnosis wherein some individuals have apraxia of speech (AOS). When agPPA includes AOS, a tauopathy is the likely underlying pathology. Recently, [18F]AV‐1451 was developed for the in‐vivo assessment of tau. In this study, we compared patterns of tau tracer uptake in patients with agPPA with and without AOS.MethodsNine patients with agPPA (four without AOS) underwent tau positron emission tomography imaging with [18F]AV‐1451. Uptake of [18F]AV‐1451 was assessed as cortical to cerebellar crus ratio (standard uptake value ratio) in cortical regions of interest measured using the MCALT atlas and compared voxel‐wise in SPM12. Each patient was age‐ and sex‐matched to three controls.ResultsThe agPPA without AOS showed uptake in the left frontal and temporal lobes, whereas agPPA with AOS showed uptake in the bilateral supplementary motor areas, frontal lobes, precuneus and precentral gyrus relative to controls. The left precentral gyrus had uptake in agPPA with AOS relative to those without AOS.ConclusionsThis cross‐sectional study suggests that [18F]AV‐1451 uptake in the precentral gyrus is implicated in AOS in agPPA.

ObjectivesTo assess [18F]AV‐1451 tau‐PET (positron emission tomography) uptake patterns across the primary progressive aphasia (PPA) variants (logopenic, semantic, and agrammatic), examine regional uptake patterns of [18F]AV‐1451 independent of clinical diagnosis, and compare the diagnostic utility of [18F]AV‐1451, [18F]‐fluorodeoxygluclose (FDG)‐PET and MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) to differentiate the PPA variants.MethodsWe performed statistical parametric mapping of [18F]AV‐1451 across 40 PPA patients (logopenic‐PPA = 14, semantic‐PPA = 13, and agrammatic‐PPA = 13) compared to 80 cognitively normal, Pittsburgh compound B–negative controls, age and gender matched 2:1. Principal component analysis of regional [18F]AV‐1451 tau‐PET standard uptake value ratio was performed to understand underlying patterns of [18F]AV‐1451 uptake independent of clinical diagnosis. Penalized multinomial regression analyses were utilized to assess diagnostic utility.ResultsLogopenic‐PPA showed striking uptake throughout neocortex, particularly temporoparietal, compared to controls, semantic‐PPA, and agrammatic‐PPA. Semantic‐PPA and agrammatic‐PPA showed milder patterns of focal [18F]AV‐1451 uptake. Semantic‐PPA showed elevated uptake (left>right) in anteromedial temporal lobes, compared to controls and agrammatic‐PPA. Agrammatic‐PPA showed elevated uptake (left>right) throughout prefrontal white matter and in subcortical gray matter structures, compared to controls and semantic‐PPA. The principal component analysis of regional [18F]AV‐1451 indicated two primary dimensions, a severity dimension that distinguished logopenic‐PPA from agrammatic‐PPA and semantic‐PPA, and a frontal versus temporal contrast that distinguishes agrammatic‐PPA and semantic‐PPA cases. Diagnostic utility of [18F]AV‐1451was superior to MRI and at least equal to FDG‐PET.Interpretation[18F]AV‐1451binding characteristics differ across the PPA variants and were excellent at distinguishing between the variants. [18F]AV‐1451binding characteristics were as good or better than other brain imaging modalities utilized in clinical practice, suggesting that [18F]AV‐1451 may have clinical diagnostic utility in PPA. Ann Neurol 2018 Ann Neurol 2018;83:599–611