Offit, Kenneth

Abstract Sequencing tests assaying panels of genes or whole exomes are widely available for cancer risk evaluation. However, methods for classification of variants resulting from this testing are not well studied. We evaluated the ability of American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines to define the rate of mutations and variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in 180 medically relevant genes, including all ACMG designated reportable cancer and non-cancer genes, in individuals who met guidelines for hereditary cancer risk evaluation. We performed whole exome sequencing in 404 individuals in 257 families and classified 1640 variants from these genes. Potentially clinically actionable (likely-pathogenic/pathogenic, LP/P) versus nonactionable (VUS/likely-benign/benign) calls were 92% and 88% concordant with locus specific databases and Clinvar, respectively. LP/P mutations were identified in 11 of 25 breast cancer susceptibility genes in 27 BRCA1/2 negative families (11%). Evaluation of 84 additional autosomal dominant cancer susceptibility genes identified LP/P mutations in only four additional families (1.7%), suggesting they do not influence risk in this cohort. However, individuals from nine of 257 families (3.5%) had incidental LP/P mutations in 32 non-cancer disease genes, and 7% of individuals were monoallelic carriers of an LP/P mutation in 39 autosomal recessive cancer syndrome genes. Furthermore, 90% of individuals had at least one VUS. In summary, these data support the clinical utility of ACMG variant classification guidelines. In addition, evaluation of extended panels of cancer genes in breast/ovarian cancer families leads to only an incremental clinical benefit but substantially increases the complexity of the results. Citation Format: Kara N. Maxwell, Steven N. Hart, Joseph Vijai, Kasmintan A. Schrader, Tinu Thomas, Bradley Wubbenhorst, Vignesh Ravichandran, Raymond M. Moore, Chunling Hu, Lucia Guidugli, Brandon Wenz, Thomas P. Slavin, Susan M. Domchek, Mark E. Robson, Csilla Szabo, Susan L. Neuhausen, Jeffrey N. Weitzel, Kenneth Offit, Fergus J. Couch, Katherine L. Nathanson. Evaluation of ACMG guideline classified variants in 180 cancer and incidental non-cancer genes in families with breast/ovarian cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 5220.

Abstract Women who carry a pathogenic mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene are at high risk of breast (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC). Their clinical management usually includes invasive risk-reducing interventions with substantial side effects. Improved personalized cancer risk estimates may help to identify women at particularly high risk or with high risk of disease at early ages who may benefit from early intervention as well as women at lower risk who may opt to delay surgery or chemoprevention. Genome-wide association studies have identified >100 common genetic variants that are associated with BC or OC risks. Several of these variants are also individually associated with risk of BC or OC for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. However, no study has evaluated the combined effects of all the known common genetic variants on BC or OC risk for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. We constructed polygenic risk scores (PRS) based on results of genetic association studies conducted in the general population. Each PRS was formed by the sum of the number of risk alleles across the variants weighted by their log-Odds Ratio estimate from population-based studies of BC or OC. We investigated 3 PRS for BC (overall, estrogen receptor (ER) positive, and ER-negative) and one PRS for OC. We used data for 15,252 BRCA1 and 8,211 BRCA2 female carriers. The association of each PRS with BC or OC risk was evaluated using a weighted cohort analysis with time to diagnosis as the outcome and estimated the Hazard Ratios (HR) per standard deviation increase in the PRS. All PRS were significantly associated with cancer risks for BRCA1/2 carriers. The PRS for ER-negative BC displayed the strongest association with BC risk in BRCA1 carriers (HR = 1.29 [1.25-1.33], p = 8×10−64). In BRCA2 carriers, the strongest association was seen for the overall BC PRS (HR = 1.26 [1.21-1.31], p = 3×10−27). The OC PRS was strongly associated with OC risk for both BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. These relative risks translate to large differences in absolute risks for carriers: e.g., the OC risk was 6% by age 80 for BRCA2 carriers at the 10th percentile of the OC PRS compared with 19% risk for those at the 90th percentile of PRS. Our findings demonstrate that BC and OC PRS derived from studies in the general population are predictive of cancer risks in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. Incorporation of the PRS into risk prediction models would improve risk prediction and hence inform decisions on cancer risk management. Citation Format: Karoline Kuchenbaecker, Jacques Simard, Kenneth Offit, Fergus J. Couch, Douglas F. Easton, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Antonis C. Antoniou, Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2. Predicting breast and ovarian cancer risks for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers using polygenic risk scores. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 2598.

Abstract Marginal zone lymphomas (MZL) are a group of indolent non-Hodgkin's B-cell lymphomas (NHL) comprising extranodal MZL of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) type, splenic MZL and nodal MZL. MZL comprises 7-12% of adult NHLs. The genetic etiology of MZL is poorly understood. To better understand the genetic risk factors for MZL, we conducted the first genome-wide association study (GWAS) of this lymphoid malignancy. The GWAS included 824 MZL cases and 6,220 controls of European ancestry from 22 studies of NHL. Genotyping was carried out at the Cancer Genomics Research Laboratory (CGR) of NCI using Illumina Human OmniExpress arrays. Standard genotyping quality controls were performed. Imputation of common SNPs was performed using IMPUTE2 software and 1000 Genomes Project release version 3 data. Association testing was subsequently performed using SNPTEST, assuming a log-additive genetic model adjusting for age, gender and three significant eigenvectors. We identified one locus at 6p21.32 within the HLA class II region that attained genome-wide significance (P<5x10-8). When a small number of additional cases (n=58) and controls (n=66) genotyped using Taqman assays were included, rs9461741 (BTNL2) was associated with an increased risk of MZL (per-allele odds ratio = 2.38, 95% confidence interval: 1.74-3.24; P=4.32x10-8). Other SNPs at the 6p21.32 locus were also highly associated with MZL, suggesting that this is unlikely to be a chance finding. Promising signals yet to be confirmed were also observed on chromosomes 3 and 14. The BTNL2 protein has extracellular immunoglobulin domains and is expressed in multiple tissues including various immune organs and the gut and it inhibits T-cell activation. Genetic variability at BTNL2 has been associated with inflammatory and infectious phenotypes, highlighting the importance of this locus for immune diseases. In conclusion, findings from this GWAS identify the HLA class II region as an important susceptibility locus for MZL. Citation Format: Joseph Vijai, Zhaoming Wang, Sonja I. Berndt, Susan L. Slager, James R. Cerhan, Christine Skibola, Sophia S. Wang, Angela R. Brooks-Wilson, Silvia de Sanjose, Paige M. Bracci, Mads Melbye, Bengt Glimelius, Rebecca D. Jackson, Wendy Cozen, Nikolaus Becker, Lauren R. Teras, John J. Spinelli, Jenny Turner, Qing Lan, Mark P. Purdue, Kimberly A. Bertrand, Kenneth Offit, Paolo Vineis, Brian K. Link, Graham G. Giles, Anne Zelenuich-Jacquotte, Alain Monnereau, Maria Grazia Ennas, Demetrius Albanes, Laurie Burdett, Nathaniel Rothman, Stephen J. Chanock, Alexandra Nieters, On behalf of the NHL GWAS Consortium. A genome-wide association study suggests evidence of variants at 6p21.32 associated with marginal zone lymphoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 5071. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-5071

Abstract Germline mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 underlie joint susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancers, but do not account for all cases. Genome wide association studies show little overlap between common variants associated with breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility, whereas rare variants in genes initially identified as breast cancer susceptibility genes also confer susceptibility to ovarian cancer cases, unselected for breast cancer. Ovarian and breast tumors also are observed in Peutz-Jeghers and possibly in Lynch syndrome. To further elucidate rare germline susceptibilities for breast and ovarian cancer, we have ascertained a unique cohort of 90 BRCA1/2-negative probands with a personal history of breast cancer and ovarian/fallopian tube/peritoneal cancer, unselected for family history. Cases are from the clinical genetics services of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and University of Pennsylvania. Analysis is ongoing using both targeted and exome sequencing approaches. Germline DNA of 69 cases will be subjected to whole exome sequencing. A total of 21 additional cases will undergo targeted sequencing for 28 genes (8 cases) and an extended panel of 54 genes (13 cases). The majority of ovarian cancers are high-grade serous epithelial ovarian carcinoma (n=51), in combination with invasive ductal or DCIS (n=36), invasive lobular (n=4), or unspecified (n=11) breast cancers. The remaining ovarian subgroups comprise other epithelial subtypes; endometrioid (n=9), clear cell (n=3), mucinous and low-grade serous (n=3) and non-epithelial (n=4) or unclassified (n=20), in combination with invasive ductal or DCIS (n=21), invasive lobular (n=5) or unspecified (n=13) breast cancers. Preliminary analysis of the targeted set of genes in 69 cases, reveals 43 predicted pathogenic coding or splice site variants; 17 of which are within PALB2, MSH2, MSH6, BARD1, FANCE, CDKN2A, TP53, SETD2, SIRT1, BRIP1, RAD50, and RAD51D and are not seen in dbSNP138, 1000 Genomes or Exome Variant Server ESP6500 and 26 variants with reported frequencies in MUTYH, MSH6, MLH1, FAM175A, RAD50, UIMC1, JARID2, PHF3, SIRT1, MRE11A, ATM, BRCA2, TP53BP1, CDH1, RAD51D, BRCA1, BABAM1 of less than 1% allele frequency in public databases. Analysis of these variants across and within histologic subtypes is being undertaken to look for specific genotype-phenotype correlations. Analysis of novel candidate genes and pathways by co-segregation, functional analysis, as well as external replication is underway to determine whether shared rare variants, mutated genes, or altered pathways confer cancer susceptibility in this cohort. Germline susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer is heterogenous and remains a critical research and clinical question. Improved understanding of the susceptibility genetics will allow further examination of the utility of targeted cancer prevention strategies in those who are found to be at risk. Citation Format: Kasmintan A. Schrader, Kara N. Maxwell, Joseph Vijai, Steven Hart, Tinu Thomas, Bradley Wubbenhorst, Lucia Guidugli, Robert Klein, Marina Corines, Liying Zhang, Susan Neuhausen, Jeffrey Weitzel, Namrata Gupta, Larry Norton, Clifford Hudis, Gad Getz, Mark Daly, Steven Lipkin, David Altshuler, Fergus Couch, Katherine Nathanson, Kenneth Offit. Determination of cancer susceptibility in probands with breast and ovarian cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 3282. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-3282

Abstract Massively parallel next generation sequencing data (NGS) has proved to be useful in identification of rare Mendelian disorders. Efforts are on-going to use NGS for discovery of novel rare variants in common disease etiology. Distinguishing rare private mutations from causal variants remains a major challenge in complex disorders. With decreasing cost, investigators are generating NGS data for common cancers. However, power and other considerations suggest that a consortia approach of pooling data is more likely to succeed where individual efforts fail. Combining data within such consortia brings its own level of challenges. We enumerate these challenges and suggest recommendations based on our experience of combining and harmonizing NGS data on 358 breast cancer samples from four centers; (City of Hope n=8, Mayo Clinic n=221, MSKCC n=96 and University of Pennsylvania n=33). Major concerns were ability of individual datasets to discover known and novel variations, depth of coverage across the exome, and quality of variants. Using pre- and post-processed data, we demonstrate an increased power for detecting variants when using a joint-calling method, quality control (QC) and quality assurance pre- and post-merge, as well as the advantages of combined annotations and filtering procedures. To generate a filtered list of high confident calls, we subset the data on Depth per Allele (DP), Genotyping Quality (GQ), Allele balance, Phred likelihood score (PL) as well as using frequency filters on the alternate allele both within the data and comparing against convenience control summaries. We describe general principles and QC measures to be adopted when NGS data is used from diverse sources, specifically applicable to large consortia. Note: This abstract was not presented at the meeting. Citation Format: Joseph Vijai, Steven Hart, Tinu Thomas, Bradley Wubbenhorst, Lucia Guidugli, Kasmintan Schrader, Kara Maxwell, Lauren Jacobs, Danylo Villano, Robert Klein, Steven Lipkin, Susan Neuhausen, Jeffrey Weitzel, David Altshuler, Fergus Couch, Kenneth Offit, Katherine Nathanson. Harmonization of next generation sequencing data within consortia for gene discovery in familial breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 2378. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-2378

Abstract BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA) testing is uninformative in approximately 80% of families with clinical features of inherited susceptibility to breast cancer. Early identification of the individuals at risk in BRCAx families may lead to enhanced screening and prevention strategies, and potentially improved overall survival as has been seen for carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations. A proportion of these families are likely explained by mutations in other high penetrance and moderate penetrance breast cancer susceptibility genes. Although multi-gene panels are now commercially available for clinical testing, only limited information is available on the spectrum of mutations in breast cancer susceptibility genes in specific subgroups of high-risk breast cancer patients. We performed whole exome sequencing in 278 BRCA1/2 negative individuals with high-risk familial breast cancer, defined as a proband and at least two first or second degree relatives with breast cancer. Samples included 232 individuals from 97 families and 49 unrelated individuals, for a total of 146 independent cases. Data were analyzed for identification of all variants in 18 known high and moderate penetrance breast cancer susceptibility genes, in addition to BRCA1 and BRCA2. Two of the 97 families and one of the 49 singletons (2% of independent cases) were found to have deleterious mutations in high penetrance genes, namely TP53 (2) and CDH1 (1). In addition, nine of 146 independent cases (6%) were found to have deleterious mutations in the other predisposition genes. Mutations in ATM and CHEK2 accounted for seven of the ten moderate penetrance mutations identified; additionally one family had a mutation in BLM, one in MRE11A, and one in PALB2. Furthermore, 15 of 146 independent cases (10%) were found to have variants of unknown significance (VUS) in one of eight genes. There were no deleterious mutations or VUS in eight of the 18 genes. Our data show that significant genetic heterogeneity exists in BRCAx families. Large-scale collaborative efforts will be required to attain sufficient power to understand how to appropriately apply these results clinically in cancer risk evaluation. Citation Format: Kara N. Maxwell, Lucia Guidugli, Kasmintan Schrader, Steven Hart, Vijai Joseph, Tinu Thomas, Xianshu Wang, Bradley Wubbenhorst, Robert Klein, Susan M. Domchek, Csilla Szabo, Susan Neuhausen, Jeffrey Weitzel, Katherine L. Nathanson, Kenneth Offit, Fergus Couch. High and moderate penetrance germline mutations in a number of genes are responsible for a small proportion of familial breast cancer risk in BRCAx families. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 1291. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-1291

The cloning of the breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 nearly two decades ago helped set in motion an avalanche of research exploring how genomic information can be optimally applied to identify and clinically care for individuals with a high risk of developing cancer. Genetic testing for mutations in BRCA1 , BRCA2 , and other breast cancer susceptibility genes has since proved to be a valuable tool for determining eligibility for enhanced screening and prevention strategies, as well as for identifying patients most likely to benefit from a targeted therapy. Here, we discuss the landscape of inherited mutations and sequence variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 , the complexities of determining disease risk when the pathogenicity of sequence variants is uncertain, and current strategies for clinical management of women who carry BRCA1/2 mutations.