Citations 1
Staged Versus Immediate Complete Revascularization in Patients With STEMI and Multivessel Disease: An Updated Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials With Trial Sequential Analysis
Majeed, Mir W., Humayun, Zainab , Joshi, Dhruvi , Murtafa, Khubaib Mohammad , Consoli, Leo, Arif, Mohammad S., Khanday, Sadiya S., Srinivasan, Rohit V., Ruelas, Mariano G., Ratan, Piyush , Wani, Shariq A., Ali, Bismah Azam, Zehra, Saima, Mantoo, Mohsin R., Changal, Khalid H., Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra, Baqal, Omar , Majeed, Mir Wajid , Consoli, Leo , Arif, Mohammad Sameem, Khanday, Sadiya Sajad, Srinivasan, Rohit Vondivillu , Ruelas, Mariano Gallo , Waleed, Muhammad, Wani, Shariq Ahmad , Baqal, Omar J , Mantoo, Mohsin Raj , Changal, Khalid Hamid, Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra
Critical Pathways in Cardiology: A Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine | May 22, 2026 | Volume: 25 | Issue: 2 | Pages: e0422
Complete revascularization improves outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD); however, the optimal timing of noninfarct-related artery intervention during the index procedure, immediate revascularization (IR) versus a staged approach (SR), remains uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing SR and IR in patients with STEMI and MVD. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events. Secondary outcomes included all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction, unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization, stent thrombosis, stroke, major bleeding, acute kidney injury, and heart failure hospitalization. Random-effects models with Hartung–Knapp adjustment were used. Trial sequential analysis assessed evidence conclusiveness, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. Eight randomized trials, including 5077 patients (2556 SR; 2521 IR), were analyzed. No significant differences were observed between SR and IR for major adverse cardiovascular events [odds ratios (ORs), 1.07; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.76–1.49], recurrent myocardial infarction (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.80–2.14), cardiovascular mortality (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.51–1.13), or all-cause mortality (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.54–1.06). Rates of stent thrombosis, stroke, unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization, major bleeding, acute kidney injury, and heart failure hospitalization were also comparable. Trial sequential analysis indicated insufficient information size to draw definitive conclusions, and the certainty of evidence ranged from very low to low. In patients with STEMI and MVD, staged and immediate complete revascularization provide comparable ischemic, safety, and mortality outcomes. Current evidence supports clinical equipoise, and revascularization timing should be individualized pending results from adequately powered trials.