Back to Authors

Durazo, Francisco

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7495-389X

Mayo Clinic

Medical College of Wisconsin

Citations 2

Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of fibrolamellar oncocytic hepatoma (FLO) and conventional hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC): An observational study.
Shreenivas, Aditya , George, Ben , Puckett, Lindsay , Chakrabarti, Sakti , Straza, Michael , Hall, William A. , Loy, Veronica , Rilling, William S., Hong, Johnny C. , Gamblin, T. Clark , Smolock, Amanda R. , Christians, Kathleen K. , Dougherty, Kali, Durazo, Francisco , Chakrabarti, Sakti , Thomas, James P. , Awan, Musaddiq J. , Kamgar, Mandana , Tsai, Susan , Danziger, Natalie , Ross, Jeffrey S.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | January 19, 2022 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 4_suppl | Pages: 474-474

10.1200/jco.2022.40.4_suppl.474 Get It

474 Background: FLO is a rare variant of liver cancer that disproportionately affects young adults and is frequently progressive and fatal as it is often detected in a clinically advanced stage. It is seldom associated with cirrhosis of liver, viral hepatitis or other risk factors associated with conventional HCC. Treatment options are largely limited to surgical resection, and there is dearth of effective targeted therapies for FLO. Methods: Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) was performed using the Foundation Medicine Inc. (FMI) data base on 63 FLO and 1,793 HCC clinically advanced cases between 6/2013-12/2020 using a hybrid capture-based assay of up to 324 genes a to detect genomic alterations (GA), tumor mutational burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI). PD-L1 expression in tumor cells (Dako 22C3) was measured by IHC and scored using the tumor proportion score (TPS) method. Results: The FLO patients (pts) were significantly younger than HCC pts (median age 20 vs. 64, respectively) and the male preponderance was similar. The HCC group featured significantly more GA/tumor than FLO group (3.74 vs 1.31 p<.0001). In the currently untargetable GA group, CTNNB1, TERT and TP53 GA were significantly more frequent in HCC than FLO. GA in potentially targetable genes were extremely uncommon in both FLO and HCC with HCC featuring slightly more MTOR pathway targets ( PTEN, TSC2, NF1). GA in DNA damage and repair (DDR) pathway including BRCA2 were infrequent in both groups. GA in targetable kinases including EGFR, ERBB2, ALK, RET and PIK3CA were extremely uncommon in both groups. GA associated with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IDH1, FGFR2) were extremely uncommon in these tumors. Although the mean TMB was significantly higher in HCC than FLO, overall TMB was low with very few cases having TMB > 10 mutations/Mb. PD-L1 expression was relatively low in both groups. GA in genes associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPI) drug response like PBRM1, CD274, MDM2, STK11 were rarely identified in both groups. Additional details are illustrated in the table. Conclusions: Comparison of CGP of FLO with HCC illustrates the multifarious nature of these cancers. In HCC, there is a high prevalence of GA in TERT, CTNNB1 and TP53. CGP identified certain targetable GA in the MTOR and DDR pathways and TMB was higher in HCC. These findings warrant further evaluation of clinically advanced FLO and HCC pts by CGP to identify possible targetable genomic pathways. [Table: see text]
Boceprevir in liver transplant recipients
Saab, Sammy , Manne, Vignan, Bau, Sherona, Reynolds, Justin, Allen, Ruby, Durazo, Francisco , El-Kabany, Mohammed M., Han, Steven, Busuttil, Ronald W. , Goldstein, Leonard D.

Liver International | March 26, 2014 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 192-197

10.1111/liv.12548 Get It

AbstractBackgroundThere has been increasing interest in using protease inhibitors with pegylated interferon and ribavirin to treat recurrent hepatitis C (HCV) disease in liver transplant recipients.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy in liver transplant recipients treated for recurrent hepatitis C genotype 1 with the combination of peginterferon, ribavirin and boceprevir.ResultsTwenty liver transplant recipients were treated for recurrent hepatitis C. Baseline alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin and HCV RNA values (± SD) were 67.5 (±50.9) mg/dl, 1.78 (±1.99) U/L, and 16 955 510 (±21 620 675) IU/ml. Anaemia was a common adverse event requiring epoetin in 16 of 20 recipients and ribavirin dose reductions in 17 of 20 recipients. One‐third of recipients required a blood transfusion. Filgrastim was used in 11 of 20 patients (55%) and eltrombopag in two of 20 recipients (10%) over the course of treatment. Serum creatinine level increased significantly from a baseline value of 1.33 mg/dl to 1.59 mg/dl at week 20 of boceprevir (P < 0.005). The overall sustained viral response (SVR) was 50%. Of the 14 patients who had a viral load less than 1000 IU/ml at week 4 of boceprevir, the SVR was 71%. The SVR was 83% of the 11 patients who had undetectable viral levels at week 4 of boceprevir.ConclusionsAntiviral therapy utilizing boceprevir in liver transplant recipients requires close monitoring. Anaemia and neutropenia were common requiring growth factors in most recipients. On‐treatment viral responses appear promising but long‐term data are needed.