McCoy, Rozalina G.

Importance Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is common and contributes to skeletal and kidney end-organ damage. Although parathyroidectomy can mitigate these complications, many patients are managed with observation, and real-world data on the population-based frequency and timing of end-organ damage under usual care are limited. Objective To evaluate the frequency and timing of end-organ damage associated with PHPT. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study included a population-based cohort identified from national electronic health record (EHR) and claims data (2010-2023) with follow-up through 2023. Participants were adults with a new biochemical diagnosis of PHPT. Data analysis was performed from August 2025 to April 2026. Exposure A new biochemical diagnosis of PHPT was defined as an elevated PTH (>65 pg/mL) within 1 month after a second elevated calcium level (serum calcium >10.2 mg/dL or ionized calcium >1.3 mmol/L or >5.3 mg/dL). Main Outcomes and Measures PHPT-associated end-organ damage (osteoporosis, atraumatic fractures, kidney stones, stage 3 or worse chronic kidney disease) at or after PHPT diagnosis using EHR or claim codes and laboratory data, in addition to the frequency and timing of parathyroidectomy. Results A total of 43 399 patients with PHPT were identified (mean [SD] age, 67.9 [12.5] years; 33 854 [78%] female and 9545 [22%] male), of whom 22 279 (51.3%) had end-organ damage at diagnosis. Among 21 120 patients without end-organ damage at diagnosis, 6762 (32.0%) progressed to end-organ damage after a median (IQR) 516 (166-1125) days. Only 4442 patients (19.9%) with end-organ damage at diagnosis were treated with parathyroidectomy. Among those who progressed to end-organ damage, 1348 (19.9%) underwent subsequent parathyroidectomy, which occurred a median (IQR) 154 (41-439) days later. Conclusions and Relevance In this national cohort of adults with a biochemical diagnosis of PHPT, 67% had PHPT-associated end-organ damage at diagnosis or on follow-up. Despite this, parathyroidectomy was uncommon. These findings may inform strategies to optimize utilization of parathyroidectomy and mitigate PHPT-associated morbidity.

Abstract Background The self-management of type 2 diabetes (T2D) typically requires enacting various lifestyle changes, which can challenge people living with T2D. Clinical encounters between people with T2D and their clinicians, however, are often focused on metabolic management, leaving less time available for other self-management topics. The QBSAFE cards help patients articulate aspects of their experience with diabetes and prioritize issues for discussion. Methods This report details secondary outcomes of a randomized controlled trial; primary outcomes are reported elsewhere. All data was collected at Fair Haven Community Health Care, a federally qualified primary care clinic. 11 clinicians were randomly assigned to provide either usual care or usual care with QBSAFE cards to 155 of their patients with type 2 diabetes and hemoglobin A1c >8%. All patient encounters were video recorded for analysis. Patients and clinicians were not blinded to arm allocation but were kept unaware of the specific aims of the trial. Encounter video reviewers were blinded to arm allocation, but not to specific aims of the trial. The outcomes of interest for this report were the extent to which the QBSAFE cards were used as intended, their effect on the topics of discussion, and whether they enabled clinicians to notice and respond to each patient’s situation; comparisons between arms were conducted by a linear mixed model with fixed effect of arm and cluster effect of clinician, analyzed in both intent-to-treat and per-protocol populations. Findings 12 patients were excluded post-randomization (A1c <8%). Of 143 eligible patients, 137 encounters (65 in the usual care arm, 72 in QBSAFE) yielded evaluable videos. QBSAFE was used as intended in 61 (85%) QBSAFE arm encounters. Conversations about burden of treatment related to non-pharmacological interventions (17 vs 33, p = 0·04) and taking medications (11 vs 33, p = 0·0008) and about the patient’s challenging environment (2 vs 10, p = 0·04) were more prevalent in the QBSAFE group. There was no difference in the rate of conversations about metabolic management or of new care plans as a result of conversations between groups. Interpretation While there was a difference in the types of conversations observed between the two study arms, this difference was small and only apparent in a few domains. Future work could aim to modify the QBSAFE cards to more effectively stimulate patient-centered discussions and to further prepare clinicians to respond to a variety of issues raised during the clinical visit. Funding This work was supported by funding from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK129616).