Satlin, Andrew

Abstract The idea that it might be possible to prevent some forms of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia has finally come of age. The hexanucleotide repeat expansion in the C9orf72 gene accounts for ∼10% of all amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and 10%–15% of all frontotemporal dementia diagnoses, with the two clinical syndromes co-manifesting in a significant number of patients. As a result, clinically unaffected carriers of pathogenic C9orf72 repeat expansions are currently the largest identifiable population at significantly elevated risk for both amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia, and in whom it might be possible to prevent the emergence of clinically manifest disease. Strategies for the design of disease prevention trials among clinically unaffected C9orf72 carriers have begun to emerge separately in the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia fields. However, recognition of the need to define neurodegenerative diseases based on biology underscores the need to consider all potential clinical manifestations of a C9orf72 repeat expansion together, rather than the traditional siloed approach of focusing on only amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or only frontotemporal dementia. Indeed, emerging clinical and biological markers that might be used to quantify pre-symptomatic disease progression and to predict the short-term risk of phenoconversion to clinically manifest disease are shared across the phenotypic spectrum. Given the anticipated progress in the development of therapeutic strategies to target the C9orf72 repeat expansion, and the enthusiasm for prevention trials among the unaffected C9orf72 repeat expansion carrier population, now is the time to begin work on the design of disease prevention trials. To this end, The Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration and The ALS Association supported a multi-stakeholder workshop (in Washington D.C., June 2024) to unify efforts to design a prevention trial for the population at elevated genetic risk for the phenotypic spectrum of C9orf72 disease. Here we describe recommendations emanating from this workshop for the selection of outcome measures, delineation of eligibility criteria, optimal use of biomarkers and digital health technologies, potential analytic frameworks and relevant regulatory considerations related to C9orf72 disease prevention trials. We also emphasize the importance of the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia communities working together in partnership with the C9orf72 repeat expansion carrier community, the regulatory authorities and the broader drug development community.

SummaryObjectiveTo better understand the relationship between efficacy and perampanel dose, integrated actual (last) dose data from three phase III trials and an extension study (blinded Conversion Period; open‐label Maintenance Period) were analyzed.MethodsSeizure frequency data were analyzed in patients who were randomized to and completed the 13‐week Maintenance Period of the phase III studies on perampanel 8 mg, and who received an actual (last) dose of 12 mg during (1) the extension 16‐week blinded Conversion Period or (2) weeks 1–13 of the extension Maintenance Period. Due to a treatment‐by‐region interaction (p = 0.042), analyses excluded patients from the Latin America region (n = 162/1,480; 10.9% of the treated cohort).ResultsOf 372 patients randomized to 8 mg in the phase III studies, 273 completed the Maintenance Period at 8 mg and 267 entered the extension study. In patients who then had an actual (last) dose of 12 mg during the extension blinded Conversion Period (n = 217), median percent change in seizure frequency per 28 days improved from −32.4% (8 mg, phase III Maintenance Period) to −44.2% (12 mg, extension blinded Conversion Period); 50% responder rates increased slightly from 37.3% to 42.9%. In patients who completed the phase III studies on 8 mg and had an actual (last) dose of 12 mg during weeks 1–13 of the extension Maintenance Period (n = 181), median percent change in seizure frequency per 28 days improved from −34.1% (phase III Maintenance Period) to −46.0% (weeks 1–13 extension Maintenance Period); 50% responder rates were 39.2% and 46.4%. Seizure control remained substantially unchanged in patients who completed the phase III studies at 12 mg and continued on that dose during the extension.SignificanceIncreasing perampanel dose from 8 to 12 mg can produce additional benefits in seizure control in at least some patients who tolerate the higher dose.