Wilson, Melissa Ann

Abstract Description Evidence consistent with immunoediting in human cancer has been identified through associative studies. To provide direct evidence that differences in the neoantigen profile are immune-mediated, we compared the neoantigen profiles of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) from immunocompetent and immunosuppressed patients. Despite consistency in the overall mutational burden and signature, immunocompetent patients have a lower clonal mutational burden compared to immunosuppressed patients. Furthermore, clonal mutations in cSCC from immunocompetent patients have a lower proportion of neoantigens predicted to bind MHC class I, supporting the role of the immune system in shaping the neoantigen profile. In single-cell RNA sequencing of intratumoral CD8+ T cells from a separate cohort of cSCC from immunocompetent and immunosuppressed patients, we observe an increase in exhausted CD8+ T cells in tumors from immunocompetent patients, suggesting an explanation for the persistence of binding neoantigens subclonally. Finally, we compare clonal and subclonal neoantigens as an unbiased screen for characteristics associated with neoantigen immunogenicity. Neoantigens with a large increase in predicted MHC class I binding relative to the normal peptide are enriched in subclonal neoantigens in immunocompetent patients. Overall, this work supports the immune system’s role in sculpting the neoantigen profile of cSCC. Funding Sources Supported by American Cancer Society - Simone Charitable Foundation - Discovery Boost Grant, AZ-DBG-23-1151311-01-IBCD; NIH F30CA281056; R35GM149235 Topic Categories Tumor Immunology: Cellular Responses and Tumor Microevironment (TIME)

Background Challenges in predicting which neoantigens mediate tumor rejection limit the efficacy of neoantigen vaccines to treat cancers, especially for cancers with a high mutational burden like cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). Only a small portion of neoantigens prioritized by current methods elicit effective T cell responses, demonstrating the critical need for improved criteria for the prediction of tumor-rejecting neoantigens. Methods Publicly available human cSCC datasets were used to assess the frequency of shared mutations between patients. A transplantable ultraviolet light-induced mouse model of cSCC was generated. The mutational signature and driver mutations in the mouse model were compared with human tumors. Neoantigens were prioritized in the mouse model, and tumor-rejecting neoantigens were identified through (enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISpot) and in vivo prophylactic vaccination. Binding of the neoantigens and corresponding wild-type peptides to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I was determined. Structural modeling of peptide:MHC complexes was performed to assess for changes in structural characteristics of the neoantigens relative to the wild-type peptides. Results A minority of human cSCC tumors shared neoantigens. The mouse cSCC model recapitulated the mutational signature and driver mutations found in human disease and was constrained by CD8 T cells. Two MHC class I neoantigens were identified in the mouse model that constrained cSCC growth. One tumor-rejecting neoantigen exhibited improved MHC binding, and the other had increased solvent accessibility of the mutated residue, compared with wild-type. Across known neoantigens that do not impact MHC binding, increased exposure of the mutated residue distinguished tumor-rejecting from non-immunogenic neoantigens. Conclusions Given the paucity of shared mutations, this work supports the need for personalized neoantigen vaccines in cSCC. To facilitate further discovery, we provide a clinically relevant mouse cSCC model with two defined neoantigens that mediate tumor rejection. Structural changes in the exposure of features that promote T cell receptor recognition defined tumor-rejecting neoantigens. Incorporation of structural modeling to predict changes in T cell receptor accessibility is anticipated to improve the selection of neoantigens for inclusion in personalized cancer vaccines.