Back to Authors

Gudena, Vinay

Mayo Clinic

Cone Health

Citations 2

Treatment of Established Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathy with N-Palmitoylethanolamide: A Randomized, Double-Blind Phase II Pilot Study
Davis, Mellar P. , Ulrich, Angela , Gudena, Vinay, Ruddy, Kathryn J. , D’Andre, Stacy D. , Giridhar, Karthik V. , Vasireddy, Vamsi K., Agarwal, Rajiv , Azzouqa, Abdel‐Ghani, Novotny, Paul, McCue, Shaylene , Bauer, Brent A. , Loprinzi, Charles L. , Giridhar, Karthik V , Agarwal, Rajiv , Bauer, Brent A , Loprinzi, Charles , Ulrich, Angela , Segal, Rebecca A.

Cancers | December 20, 2024 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 24 | Pages: 4244

10.3390/cancers16244244 Get It

Background: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) from oxaliplatin and taxane drugs is a bothersome toxicity. Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) has been reported to improve myelinated nerve fiber function in patients experiencing painful CIPN. We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of PEA in patients with established CIPN. Methods: Eligible patients were adults who had pain, numbness, tingling, or other symptoms of CIPN for at least three months following completion of paclitaxel, oxaliplatin, or cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Study patients were randomized to one of the two treatment groups (PEA versus placebo, both administered either once or twice daily). The CIPN20 questionnaire was assessed weekly. Results: A total of 17 males and 71 females participated in the study; most had neuropathy from paclitaxel. Most (85%) finished 8 weeks of treatment. There was no suggestion that either of the PEA arms did any better than the combined placebo arms. There was no signal of significant toxicity differences between the three study arms. Quality of life outcome measures were similar between the study arms, as were cognitive function evaluations. Discussion: PEA failed to improve established CIPN. Future trials might explore whether PEA may be effective in preventing CIPN or cognitive changes based on data that suggest it may be helpful in this situation. Conclusions: PEA failed to improve established chemotherapy-induced neuropathy.
Chemotherapeutic and targeted biological agents for metastatic bladder cancer: A comprehensive review
Sio, Terence T., Ko, Jocelyn, Gudena, Vinay, Verma, Nitin, Chaudhary, Uzair B.

International Journal of Urology | January 23, 2014 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 630-637

10.1111/iju.12407 Get It

AbstractThe American Cancer Society estimates that 73 510 new cases of bladder cancer will be diagnosed and 15 000 deaths will result this year. The paper summarizes the clinical evidence for the use of platinum‐based, non‐platinum‐based and new targeted biological agents, while reporting the future directions in the treatment of metastatic bladder cancer. For cisplatin‐base regimens, the combination of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin (M‐VAC) has been the mainstream treatment for both advanced and metastatic bladder cancers. It showed significant improvement in the complete response rate and overall survival time in comparison with single‐agent cisplatin. For cisplatin‐ineligible patients, namely patients with renal impairment, symptomatic cardiac disease and poor performance status, alternative therapies consisting of paclitaxel, gemcitabine and carboplatin were shown to be of benefit. Pemetrexed and vinflunine have also shown effectiveness, with small but demonstrable overall survival benefits. Gemcitabine‐based doublet therapies (combined with paclitaxel, docetaxel, irinotecan, oxaliplatin or epirubicin) have all been shown to be effective and well‐tolerated. Several new targeted therapies, such as gefetinib, sorafenib and lapatinib, have received attention in recent years; however, their effectiveness as single agents in a relapse setting have not been optimal and more studies are warranted.