Klein, Christopher J.

Recent literature has emphasized the role of hand surgeons in screening patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) for amyloidosis by performing a carpal tunnel synovial biopsy during open carpal tunnel release (CTR). This has led to misconceptions about the diagnostic utility of synovial biopsy and the clinical evaluation of suspected amyloidosis. Controversy over carpal tunnel biopsy is exacerbated by minimally invasive advances in CTR procedures. This current perspective aims to determine the role of carpal tunnel synovial biopsy in amyloidosis and provide an update for hand surgeons regarding the nuances of amyloidosis. We conclude that carpal tunnel synovial biopsy should not be performed without CTS symptoms but only in patients meeting criteria for open CTR such as in those with severe symptoms which have failed nonoperative treatment and minimally invasive procedures are contraindicated. A screening approach for amyloidosis is proposed in patients presenting with CTS symptoms. Despite advances in the understanding, treatment, and diagnosis of amyloidosis, there remains a need for accurate, specific, and sensitive diagnostic tests.

Abstract Background Autoimmunity targeting GQ1b is associated with group of disorders that includes Miller-Fisher Syndrome (MFS), Bickerstaff Brainstem Encephalitis (BBE) and classic Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) with ophthalmoplegia. Collectively these are referred to as GQ1B-IgG related syndromes. The prevalence of GQ1b-IgG in this population of patients is high and has been reported to be >80% in well-defined clinical cohorts. Clinical phenotypic presentation is diverse and requires highly accurate antibody testing. The objective of this study was to evaluate a newly developed custom GQ1b-IgG assay, using a semi-quantitative ELISA-based method. Methods A GQ1b-IgG ELISA was developed and validated. Patient sera along with assay controls and a single-point calibrator are diluted and incubated in duplicate wells in a 96-well plate coated with GQ1b antigen. The plate is washed and incubated with anti-human-IgG secondary antibody conjugated with HRP. After a colorimetric reaction, optical densities (OD) are read. The OD of patient samples are compared against the calibrator, generating a cut-off index (COI). Samples ≥1.0 COI are considered positive. During the validation phase, analytical and clinical performance characteristics were evaluated. Studies included assessment of imprecision at multiple concentrations of GQ1b-IgG, accuracy using method comparison, analytical sensitivity and specificity, reference range, common interferences, plate drift, and clinical performance in relevant disease and control cohorts. Results Intra-assay imprecision (coefficient of variation; %CV) ranged from 1.0 - 16% across all concentrations of GQ1b-IgG. Inter-assay imprecision (%CV) ranged from 12.4 - 44.5% but was <20% at or above the assay cut-off. We found perfect qualitative agreement with an independent ELISA reference method (20 positive and 20 negative samples selected based on reference method results [reference interval <1:100]). Limit of detection (LOD) was calculated at a COI of 0.22. To assess analytical specificity, 40 samples with high concentrations of immunoglobulins (hypergammaglobulinemia [N=15], IgG M-protein [N=15] and systemic lupus erythematosus [N=10] were tested and all were negative. A reference interval study was performed on 140 healthy donor serums, all were negative. Interference studies were conducted on 2 positive and 2 negative serum samples, spiked for highly hemolytic (1000 mg/dL), lipemic (2000 mg/dL) and icteric (60 mg/dL) conditions. There was no impact on the assay even with high levels of a given interferent. Plate drift on 2 distinct patient pools tested across the plate (COI range 0.7 - 1.3) had overall plate CV’s ≤10%. ROC analysis was performed on a cohort of 278 patient samples (15 MFS cases and 263 controls [suspected demyelinating neuropathy or disease mimics]). A cut-off value of 1.0 (COI) was selected based on the Youden index. At this cut-off, clinical sensitivity for MFS was 87% while clinical specificity was 99.2%. Conclusions The observed performance of the GQ1b-IgG ELISA was acceptable for clinical laboratory implementation. A COI of ≥ 1.0 was selected for clinical use.

Abstract Introduction/Aims Point‐of‐care ultrasound of the diaphragm is highly sensitive and specific in the detection of neuromuscular diaphragmatic dysfunction. In some patients with neuromuscular diaphragmatic dysfunction, paradoxical thinning of the diaphragm during inspiration is observed on ultrasound; however, its frequency, electrodiagnostic associations, and prognostic significance remain uncertain. Methods Medical records of patients presenting to two electrodiagnostic laboratories (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota and University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta) from January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022, for evaluation of suspected neuromuscular respiratory failure, were reviewed. Results 214 patients were referred and 19 patients excluded due to incomplete information. Of 195 patients (384 hemidiaphragms), 104 had phrenic neuropathy, 12 had myopathy, and 79 had no evidence of neuromuscular disease affecting the diaphragm. Paradoxical thinning occurred in 31 (27%) patients with neuromuscular diaphragmatic dysfunction and was unilateral in 30, the majority (83%) having normal contralateral ultrasound. Phrenic nerve conduction studies and diaphragm electromyography results did not distinguish patients with paradoxical thinning versus without. Most patients (71%) with paradoxical thinning required non‐invasive ventilation (NIV), including 16 with unilateral paradoxical thinning. Paradoxical thinning and BMI ≥30 kg/m 2 were risk factors for requiring NIV in multivariable logistic regression analysis, with odds ratios of 2.887 (95% CI:1.166, 7.151) and 2.561 (95% CI: 1.186, 5.532), respectively. Discussion Paradoxical thinning of the diaphragm occurs in patients with prominent neuromuscular diaphragmatic dysfunction, most commonly from phrenic neuropathy, and is a significant risk factor for requiring NIV. Unilateral paradoxical thinning is sufficient for needing NIV. BMI ≥30 kg/m 2 additionally increases risk of requiring NIV in patients with neuromuscular diaphragmatic dysfunction.