Dyck, P. James B.

Importance Transthyretin gene silencing is an emerging treatment strategy for hereditary transthyretin (ATTRv) amyloidosis. Objective To evaluate eplontersen, an investigational ligand-conjugated antisense oligonucleotide, in ATTRv polyneuropathy. Design, Setting, and Participants NEURO-TTRansform was an open-label, single-group, phase 3 trial conducted at 40 sites across 15 countries (December 2019-April 2023) in 168 adults with Coutinho stage 1 or 2 ATTRv polyneuropathy, Neuropathy Impairment Score 10-130, and a documented TTR variant. Patients treated with placebo from NEURO-TTR ( NCT01737398 ; March 2013–November 2017), an inotersen trial with similar eligibility criteria and end points, served as a historical placebo (“placebo”) group. Interventions Subcutaneous eplontersen (45 mg every 4 weeks; n = 144); a small reference group received subcutaneous inotersen (300 mg weekly; n = 24); subcutaneous placebo weekly (in NEURO-TTR; n = 60). Main Outcomes and Measures Primary efficacy end points at week 65/66 were changes from baseline in serum transthyretin concentration, modified Neuropathy Impairment Score +7 (mNIS+7) composite score (scoring range, –22.3 to 346.3; higher scores indicate poorer function), and Norfolk Quality of Life Questionnaire–Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QoL-DN) total score (scoring range, –4 to 136; higher scores indicate poorer quality of life). Analyses of efficacy end points were based on a mixed-effects model with repeated measures adjusted by propensity score weights. Results Among 144 eplontersen-treated patients (mean age, 53.0 years; 69% male), 136 (94.4%) completed week-66 follow-up; among 60 placebo patients (mean age, 59.5 years; 68% male), 52 (86.7%) completed week-66 follow-up. At week 65, adjusted mean percentage reduction in serum transthyretin was −81.7% with eplontersen and −11.2% with placebo (difference, −70.4% [95% CI, −75.2% to −65.7%]; P < .001). Adjusted mean change from baseline to week 66 was lower (better) with eplontersen vs placebo for mNIS+7 composite score (0.3 vs 25.1; difference, −24.8 [95% CI, −31.0 to −18.6; P < .001) and for Norfolk QoL-DN (−5.5 vs 14.2; difference, −19.7 [95% CI, −25.6 to −13.8]; P < .001). Adverse events by week 66 that led to study drug discontinuation occurred in 6 patients (4%) in the eplontersen group vs 2 (3%) in the placebo group. Through week 66, there were 2 deaths in the eplontersen group consistent with known disease-related sequelae (cardiac arrhythmia; intracerebral hemorrhage); there were no deaths in the placebo group. Conclusions and Relevance In patients with ATTRv polyneuropathy, the eplontersen treatment group demonstrated changes consistent with significantly lowered serum transthyretin concentration, less neuropathy impairment, and better quality of life compared with a historical placebo. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04136184 ; EU Clinical Trials Register: EudraCT 2019-001698-10

AbstractBackground and AimsComprehensive study of sural nerve biopsy utility based on individual histopathologic preparations is lacking. We aimed to quantify the value of different histologic preparations in diagnosis.MethodsOne hundred consecutive sural nerves were studied by standard histological preparations plus graded teased nerve fibers (GTNF), immunohistochemistry, and epoxy‐semithin morphometry. Three examiners scored the individual preparations separately by a questionnaire of neuropathic and interstitial abnormalities, masked to the biopsy number, versus a gold‐standard of all preparations. Multivariate modeling was utilized to determine best approach versus the gold‐standard.ResultsHighest confidence (range 8–9 of 10) and inter‐rater reliability (99%) for fiber abnormalities came from GTNF, and interstitial abnormalities from paraffin stains (range 7–8, 99%). Vasculitic neuropathy associated with GTNF axonal degeneration (moderate to severe 79%) with OR 3.8, 95% CI (1.001–14.7), p = .04, but not significantly with the other preparations. Clinicopathologic diagnoses associated with teased fiber abnormalities in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, 80% (8/10); amyloidosis, 50% (1/2); adult‐onset polyglucosan disease 100% (1/1). GTNF and paraffin stains significantly correlated with fiber density determined by morphometric analysis (GTNF: OR 9.9, p < .0001, paraffin: OR 3.8, p = .03). GTNF combined with paraffin sections had highest accuracy for clinicopathologic diagnoses and fiber density with 0.86 C‐stat prediction versus morphometric analysis. Pathological results lead to initiation or changes of immunotherapy in 70% (35/50; initiation n = 22, reduction n = 9, escalation n = 4) with the remaining having alternative intervention or no change.InterpretationNerve biopsy paraffin stains combined with GTNF have highest diagnostic utility, confidence, inter‐rater reliability, improving accuracy for a pathologic diagnosis aiding treatment recommendations. Immunostains and epoxy preparations are also demonstrated useful supporting consensus guidelines. This study provides class II evidence for individual nerve preparation utility.

AbstractIntroduction/AimsIn the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT), the minimal nerve conduction (NC) criterion for diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSPN) was abnormality of NC in more than one peripheral nerve without specifying the attributes of NCs to be evaluated. In the present study, we assess individual and composite scores of NCs meeting the DCCT criterion and signs for improved diagnosis and assessment of DSPN severity.MethodsEvaluated were 13 attributes and 6 composite NC scores and signs and symptoms in 395 healthy subjects (HS) and 388 persons with diabetes (DM).ResultsPercent abnormality between subjects with DM and HS was remarkably different among individual attributes and the six composite NC scores. For diagnosis of DSPN using the DCCT criterion, assessment of conduction velocities (CVs) and distal latencies (DLs) provided sensitive diagnoses of DSPN. NC amplitudes provided stronger measures of severity. In studied cohorts, DSPN was staged: N0, no NC abnormality using NC score 2 (CVs and DLs), 60.0%; N1, NC abnormality only, 18.4%; N2, NC abnormality and signs of feet or legs, 16.3%; and N3, NC abnormality and signs of thighs, 5.3%.DiscussionFor sensitive and standard diagnosis of DSPN using the DCCT NC criterion, specifically defined composite scores of CVs and DLs, e.g., score 2, is recommended. A composite score of amplitudes, e.g., score 4, provides a stronger measure of neuropathy severity. Also, provided are HS reference values of evaluated attributes of NCs and estimates of staged severity of DSPN of mid North American DM cohorts.

Abstract Background: Vasculitic neuropathies usually present acutely to subacutely, with an asymmetric pattern, involving multiple peripheral nerve territories. Drug-induced vasculitis is an often overlooked etiology of vasculitic neuropathy. Methods: We present the first reported case of nitrofurantoin-associated and an illustrative case of minocycline-associated vasculitic neuropathy, with a review of the literature. Results: The first patient is a 60-year-old woman who developed axonal sensorimotor peripheral neuropathy after nitrofurantoin use, with a superficial radial nerve biopsy confirming vasculitis. The second patient is a 23-year-old woman, with a history of acne vulgaris treated with minocycline, who presented with a subacute right common peroneal mononeuropathy followed by a left deep peroneal mononeuropathy, with elevated antinuclear, perinuclear-antineutrophil cytoplasmic, and myleoperoxidase antibodies, and MPO titers, and a sural nerve biopsy showing large arteriole vasculitis. Finally, we provide a comprehensive review of previously published cases. Conclusions: Medications should be considered as a trigger for medication-induced vasculitic neuropathy. Accurate diagnosis would ensure timely treatment.

AbstractIntroduction/AimsRecently, our group found an association between diabetes mellitus (DM) and lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy (LRPN) in Olmsted County, Minnesota; we found a higher risk (odds ratio [OR], 7.91) for developing LRPN in diabetic compared with nondiabetic patients. However, the influence of other comorbidities and anthropomorphic variables was not studied.MethodsDemographic and clinical data from 59 LRPN patients and 177 age/sex‐matched controls were extracted using the Rochester LRPN epidemiological study. Differences between groups were compared by chi‐square/Fisher exact test or Wilcoxon rank‐sum test. Uni‐ and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed.ResultsFactors predictive of LRPN on univariate analysis were DM (OR, 7.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.11‐15.21), dementia (OR, 6.36; 95% CI, 1.13‐35.67), stroke (OR, 3.81; 95% CI, 1.32‐11.01), dyslipidemia (OR, 2.844; 95% CI, 1.53‐5.27), comorbid autoimmune disorders (OR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.07‐6.93), hypertension (OR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.2‐4.13), obesity (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.11–3.8), body mass index (BMI) (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.04‐1.15), and weight (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.009‐1.037). On multivariate logistic regression analysis only DM (OR, 8.03; 95% CI, 3.86‐16.7), comorbid autoimmune disorders (OR, 4.58; 95% CI, 1.45‐14.7), stroke (OR, 4.13; 95% CI, 1.2‐14.25), and BMI (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01‐1.13) were risk factors for LRPN.DiscussionDM is the strongest risk factor for the development of LRPN, followed by comorbid autoimmune disorders, stroke, and higher BMI. Altered metabolism and immune dysfunction seem to be the most influential factors in the development of LRPN.