A Retrospective Study Identifying Factors Associated With Long-term Survival in Lung Transplant Recipients: A Focus on Psychosocial Wellbeing and Social Determinants of Health
Abstract RATIONALE: Long-term survival after lung transplantation is challenging, with limited research on risk and protective factors. Clinical factors such as younger age, female sex, fewer acute rejection hospitalizations, and double lung transplants are associated with better outcomes. However, the role of psychosocial health and socioeconomic status (SES) remains underexplored. This study aimed to assess the influence of pre-transplant psychosocial health and SES on long-term survival in adult lung transplant recipients. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective case-control study using the Mayo Clinic Rochester lung transplant registry. Cases (survivors ≥ 6 years) and controls (survivors <6 years) were matched by transplant date (+/- 5 years) and indication for transplant, resulting in 190 subjects (63 cases, 127 controls). We assessed the impact of pre-transplant psychosocial health and SES on long-term survival using initial PACT scores (<2), the HOUSES index, and the national/state area deprivation index (ADI). Additional factors included proximity to the transplant center, insurance type, marital status, primary caregiver status, and employment status. Statistical analyses used the paired Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables and McNemar's test for categorical variables, with results reported as median (IQR) or percentages. RESULTS: Donor characteristics (age, sex, smoking history, risk criteria, cause of death) and recipient characteristics (age at transplant, sex, BMI, medical condition, functional status, type of transplant) were similar between cases and controls, with no statistically significant differences (all p>0.05). CMV mismatch, waitlist time, and transplant hospital length of stay were also comparable (all p>0.05). Psychosocial health indicators, including proximity to the transplant center, pre-transplant initial PACT score, insurance type, marital status, primary caregiver, and employment status, did not differ significantly between groups (all p>0.05). The HOUSES index was similar between cases and controls (p=0.179). However, long-term survivors had significantly higher national and state ADI scores than controls (national ADI: p=0.029; state ADI: p=0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-transplant psychosocial health indicators, including proximity to the transplant center, initial PACT score, and caregiver support, did not differ significantly between long-term lung transplant survivors and those with shorter survival. Although SES measured by the HOUSES index was not associated with long-term survival, higher national and state ADI scores were linked to increased long-term survival, suggesting unique protective factors for patients from socioeconomically deprived areas. These findings highlight the complex role of socioeconomic factors in lung transplant outcomes and underscore the need for further research into how specific socioeconomic and environmental factors influence long-term survival.