Partlow, Brenda

Abstract Context Hyperglycemia is a common complication of Cushing syndrome (CS). Objective We aimed to determine the impact of curative procedure on hyperglycemia and its management in patients with CS. Methods This retrospective longitudinal cohort study took place 2000 to 2019 in a referral center among adults with endogenous CS and hyperglycemia. Main outcome measures included glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), intensity of hyperglycemia therapy, and improvement of hyperglycemia. Results In 174 patients with CS (pituitary in 106, ectopic in 25, adrenal in 43), baseline median HbA1c was 6.9% (range, 4.9-13.1), with 41 (24%) patients not on any therapy for hyperglycemia, 93 (52%) on oral medications, and 64 (37%) on insulin (median daily units of 58; range, 10-360). Following CS remission, at the end of follow-up (median 10.5 months), 37 (21%) patients demonstrated resolution of hyperglycemia, 82 (47%) demonstrated improvement, and 55 (32%) had no change or worsening in hyperglycemia. At the end of follow-up, HbA1c decreased by 0.84% (P < .001) and daily insulin dose decreased by a mean of 30 units (P < .001). Biochemical hypercortisolism severity score (severe vs moderate/mild: odds ratio [OR] of 2.4 [95% CI, 1.1-4.9]), and CS subtype (nonadrenal vs adrenal: OR of 2.9 [95% CI, 1.3-6.4]), but not type of hyperglycemia (diabetes vs prediabetes: OR of 2.1 [0.9-4.9]) were associated with hyperglycemia improvement at the end of follow-up. Conclusion Two-thirds of patients with CS and hyperglycemia demonstrate resolution or improvement of hyperglycemia after a curative procedure. Close monitoring during CS recovery is needed to ensure appropriate therapy modification.

Background: Insulin pump therapy is a complex technology prone to errors when employed in the hospital setting. When patients on insulin pump therapy require hospitalization, practitioners caring for them must decide whether to allow continued pump use. We provide the largest review regarding transitioning insulin pump therapy from the outpatient to inpatient setting. Method: Records of inpatient insulin pump users were retrospectively analyzed at a metropolitan Phoenix hospital between January 2006 and December 2009. Adherence to institutional procedures on insulin pump use was assessed, glycemic control was determined, and adverse events were examined. Results: We examined records on 65 patients with insulin pumps, totaling 125 hospitalizations. Mean (standard deviation) patient age was 55 (17) years, diabetes duration was 27 (14) years, pump duration was 6 (5) years, length of hospital stay was 4.7 (6.3) days, hemoglobin A1c was 7.3 (1.3)%, 85% had type 1 diabetes mellitus, 57% were women, and 97% were white. Admissions involving insulin pumps increased (23 in 2006, 17 in 2007, 40 in 2008, and 45 in 2009). Insulin pump therapy was continued in 83 (66%) hospitalizations. Among these hospitalizations, endocrinology consultations were obtained in 89%, consent agreements were found in 83%, insulin pump order sets were completed in 89%, admission glucose was checked in 100%, and nursing assessments of pump insertion sites were documented in 89%, but bedside insulin pump flow sheets were found in only 55%. Mean glucose of 175 (57) mg/dl was not significantly different than that in hospitalizations where insulin pumps were discontinued [175 (42) mg/dl] or used intermittently [177 (7) mg/dl]. There was one instance of a pump catheter kinking; however, no other adverse events (pump site infections, mechanical pump failure, diabetic ketoacidosis) were observed, and there were no use-related fatalities. Conclusions: Most patients using insulin pumps can safely have their therapy transitioned when hospitalized. A policy on inpatient continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion use can be successfully implemented. Compliance with required procedures can be achieved, although there was room to improve adherence with some process measures. Further study is needed to determine how to optimize glycemic control when pumps are allowed during hospitalization.