Back to Authors

Group, ESSKA Artificial Intelligence Working

Mayo Clinic

No affiliation available

Citations 1

A practical guide to the implementation of AI in orthopaedic research—Part 7: Risks, limitations, safety and verification of medical AI systems
Winkler, Philipp W. , Senorski, Eric Hamrin , Tischer, Thomas , Herbst, Elmar , Pareek, Ayoosh , Musahl, Volker , Oettl, Felix C. , Group, ESSKA Artificial Intelligence Working, Hamrin Senorski, Eric , Longo, Umile Giuseppe , Samuelsson, Kristian , Zsidai, Bálint , Pruneski, James A. , Hirschmann, Michael T. , Ley, Christophe , Oeding, Jacob F. , Oettl, Felix C. , Longo, Umile Giuseppe , Samuelsson, Kristian , Feldt, Robert , Group, ESSKA Artificial Intelligence Working

Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics | April 24, 2025 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/jeo2.70247 Get It

AbstractArtificial intelligence (AI) has been influencing healthcare and medical research for several years and will likely become indispensable in the near future. AI is intended to support healthcare professionals to make the healthcare system more efficient and ultimately improve patient outcomes. Despite the numerous benefits of AI systems, significant concerns remain. Errors in AI systems can pose serious risks to human health, underscoring the critical need for safety, as well as adherence to ethical and moral standards, before these technologies can be integrated into clinical practice. To address these challenges, the development, certification, and deployment of medical AI systems must adhere to strict and transparent regulations. The European Commission has already established a regulatory framework for AI systems by enacting the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act. This review article, part of an AI learning series, discusses key considerations for medical AI systems such as reliability, accuracy, trustworthiness, lawfulness and legal compliance, ethical and moral alignment, sustainability, and regulatory oversight.Level of EvidenceLevel V.