Back to Authors

Patil, Pallavi

Mayo Clinic

Baylor University Medical Center

Citations 1

Deep Learning Model for Histologic Diagnosis of Dysplastic Barrett's Esophagus: Multisite Cohort External Validation
Codipilly, Don C. , Faghani, Shahriar , Vogelsang, David C. , Erickson, Bradley J. , Garg, Nikita , Lewis, Jason , Leggett, Cadman L. , Konda, Vani J. , Diffalha, Sameer Al , Peter, Shajan, Brinkerhoff, Brian , Wong, Mary , Otaki, Fouad , Katzka, David A. , Wani, Sachin , Shaheen, Nicholas J. , Iyer, Prasad G. , Codipilly, Don Chamil , Vogelsang, David, Erickson, Bradley J , Hagen, Catherine E , Leggett, Cadman L , Konda, Vani , Wong, Mary , Otaki, Fouad , Katzka, D A , Faghani, Shahriar , Hagen, Catherine E. , Patil, Pallavi

American Journal of Gastroenterology | April 23, 2025 | Volume: 121 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 863-870

10.14309/ajg.0000000000003495 Get It

INTRODUCTION: The risk of progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus (BE) increases with advancing degrees of dysplasia. There is a critical need to improve the diagnosis of BE dysplasia, given substantial interobserver variability and overcalls of dysplasia during manual community pathologist reads. We aimed to externally validate a previously cross-validated BE dysplasia diagnosis deep learning model (BEDDLM) that predicts dysplasia grade on whole slide images (WSIs). METHODS: We digitized nondysplastic BE (NDBE), low-grade (LGD), and high-grade dysplasia (HGD) histology slides from 3 external academic centers. A consensus read by 2 expert study pathologists was used as the criterion standard. Slide stain characteristics were normalized using cycle-generative adversarial networks. WSIs were assessed by BEDDLM using an ensemble approach, combining a “You Only Look Once” model followed by a ResNet101 classifier model. RESULTS: We included 489 WSIs. Consensus histopathology revealed 232 NDBE, 117 LGD, and 140 HGD WSIs. The mean age (SD) was 66.9 (11.4) years; 413 (84.7%) were men. Using the BEDDLM ensemble model, sensitivity and specificity for NDBE were 73.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 67.09%–78.85%) and 93.4% (95% CI: 89.62%–96.10%); for LGD, 84.6% (95% CI: 76.78%–90.62%) and 80.6% (95% CI: 76.26%–84.54%); and for HGD, 80.7% (95% CI: 73.19%–86.89%) and 94.8% (95% CI: 91.97%–96.91%), respectively. The F1 score was 0.81, 0 0.69, and 0.83 for NDBE, LGD, and HGD, respectively. DISCUSSION: Our externally validated deep learning model demonstrates substantial accuracy for the diagnosis of BE dysplasia grade on WSIs.