Karnitz, Larry M.

Abstract Although high-grade serous ovarian cancers (HGSOC) are highly chemosensitive with an 85% initial response rate to platinum-based chemotherapy, 15% of patients are “exceptional nonresponders,” with platinum-refractory tumors that remain stable or progress during treatment. Unfortunately, we have no predictive biomarkers to identify refractory patients up front, and they receive futile chemotherapy through which most patients become too ill to be eligible for clinical trials. Hence, no progress has been made in treating these deadly tumors. The goal of this study is to identify mechanisms of platinum refractoriness to: i) predict refractory HGSOCs up front and ii) identify potential new drug targets in refractory disease to point to desperately needed new therapeutic approaches. Of note, 80-90% of patients who are initially platinum responsive will relapse and develop platinum-resistant disease, and it is possible that findings in platinum-refractory tumors might also provide insights into platinum-resistant tumors. Our NCI Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC)-funded approach combines genomic and proteomic (“proteogenomic”) analyses of both preclinical models (0, 8, and 24 hours post-platinum exposure) and treatment-naïve human tumors. For preclinical models, we studied a well-characterized collection of patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models (10 sensitive, 10 refractory), as well as intrapatient HGSOC cell line pairs derived from patients before and after the development of platinum resistance. For the PDX models, proteogenomic profiling included RNASeq, WES, global proteomics, and phosphoproteomics at all 3 time points (0, 8, 24 hours). For cell line models (3 sensitive, 3 resistant), proteogenomic profiling was performed at all 3 timepoints (0, 8, 24 hours), and experiments were performed in complete biologic triplicate. Analyses included RNASeq, WES, global proteomics, phosphoproteomics, ubiquitin proteome, acetylated proteome, and pTyr. A large collection of 275 human HGSOCs (an approximate equal balance of platinum sensitive and refractory tumors) is currently undergoing proteomic profiling, and genomic profiles (WGS, RNASeq) will be performed on a subset. In parallel, we have performed a comprehensive review of 31 years of published work on platinum responses of human cancers, identifying ~700 genes implicated in the response and scoring each gene with respect to strength of the published evidence. Using a Bayesian approach, we are integrating the curated candidates from the literature with our empirical proteogenomic datasets to identify a candidate signature for detecting platinum-refractory disease prior to chemotherapy. We are also performing gene-regulatory network analysis to identify potential drivers of chemo response. NextGen, targeted, multiplex, multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry-based assays are being developed to quantify proteins in the signature for validation studies, using independent patient cohorts. This abstract is also being presented as Poster A62. Citation Format: Jacob J. Kennedy, Shrabanti Chowdhury, Sara R. Savage, Xiaonan Hou, Catherine J. Huntoon, Richard G. Ivey, Qing Yu, Chenwei Lin, Dongqing Huang, Lei Zhao, Uliana J. Voytovich, Regine M. Schoenherr, Zahra Shire, Steven J. Skates, Jeffrey R. Whiteaker, Andrew N. Hoofnagle, Samuel C. Mok, Bing Zhang, Larry M. Karnitz, S. John Weroha, Steven P. Gygi, Scott H. Kaufmann, Pei Wang, Michael J. Birrer, Amanda G. Paulovich. Proteogenomic approach to identify mechanisms of platinum refractoriness in high-grade serous ovarian cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Ovarian Cancer Research; 2019 Sep 13-16, 2019; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(13_Suppl):Abstract nr PR02.

Abstract About 50% of high-grade serous ovarian cancers (HGSOC) have defects in homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair. Intriguingly, HR-defective tumors are highly susceptible to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and platinum-based chemotherapy. Mutations in BRCA1/2 or epigenetic silencing of BRCA1 via promoter hypermethylation contributes to ~30% of the HR defects, but other genetic alterations that cause HR deficiency in HGSOC remain unclear. To identify novel genes that may regulate HR, we studied Zinc Finger CCCH-Type Containing 18 (ZC3H18), encoded by ZC3H18. Notably, ZC3H18 lies within 16q24.2, a region with frequent copy number loss in HGSOC. Here we demonstrate that BRCA1 is transcriptionally activated by a previously unknown function of ZC3H18. We show that ZC3H18 interacts with an E2F site in the BRCA1 promoter where it facilitates recruitment of E2F4 to an adjacent E2F site to promote BRCA1 transcription. Consistent with the role of ZC3H18 in promoting BRCA1 expression, ZC3H18 depletion induces BRCA1 promoter methylation, reduces BRCA1 expression, disrupts HR, and sensitizes ovarian cancer cells to PARP inhibitors and platinum agents. Moreover, in patient-derived xenografts and primary HGSOC tumors, ZC3H18 mRNA levels were positively correlated with BRCA1 mRNA levels, further supporting the role of ZC3H18 in regulating BRCA1. Together, these findings suggest that loss and/or reduced ZC3H18 expression may help identify HGSOC patients most likely to benefit from PARP inhibitor and platinum-based therapies. Summary of the Unpublished Data/Significance/Innovation: These studies are innovative on several fronts. First, although BRCA1 methylation is a frequent event that mediates tumorigenesis and therapeutic responses in HGSOC, how BRCA1 methylation is regulated remains unknown. These studies will be the first to provide a mechanistic basis for how BRCA1 is methylated in HGSOC. Second, our studies are the first to show a role for ZC3H18 in any cancer. Third, we show that ZC3H18 regulates HR and that its depletion sensitizes ovarian cancer cells to PARP inhibitors and platinum therapy. Thus, these studies will provide important basis for developing ZC3H18 loss/decreased abundance as a novel biomarker for ovarian cancers that may respond to PARP inhibitors and platinum agents. Citation Format: Arun Kanakkanthara, Catherine J. Huntoon, Xiaonan Hou, Minzhi Zhang, Ethan P Heinzen, Ann L. Oberg, John S. Weroha, Scott H. Kaufmann, Larry M. Karnitz. Loss of ZC3H18 disrupts homologous recombination repair and sensitizes ovarian cancer cells to PARP inhibitors and DNA cross-linking agents [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Ovarian Cancer Research; 2019 Sep 13-16, 2019; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(13_Suppl):Abstract nr A33.

Abstract BRCA1 plays a key role in homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair. Accordingly, changes that downregulate BRCA1, including BRCA1 mutations and reduced BRCA1 transcription, due to promoter hypermethylation or loss of the BRCA1 transcriptional regulator CDK12, disrupt HR in multiple cancers. In addition, BRCA1 has also been implicated in the regulation of metabolism. Here, we show that reducing BRCA1 expression, either by CDK12 or BRCA1 depletion, led to metabolic reprogramming of ovarian cancer cells, causing decreased mitochondrial respiration and reduced ATP levels. BRCA1 depletion drove this reprogramming by upregulating nicotinamide N-methyltransferase (NNMT). Notably, the metabolic alterations caused by BRCA1 depletion and NNMT upregulation sensitized ovarian cancer cells to agents that inhibit mitochondrial metabolism (VLX600 and tigecycline) and to agents that inhibit glucose import (WZB117). These observations suggest that inhibition of energy metabolism may be a potential strategy to selectively target BRCA1-deficient high-grade serous ovarian cancer, which is characterized by frequent BRCA1 loss and NNMT overexpression. Significance: Loss of BRCA1 reprograms metabolism, creating a therapeutically targetable vulnerability in ovarian cancer.

Abstract Background: Cytosine arabinoside (ara-C) remains the backbone of most regimens for the treatment of AML. The incorporation of ara-C into DNA activates checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) causing replication fork slowing, the accumulation of cells in S phase, and diminished ara-C cytotoxicity. The selective Chk1 inhibitor MK-8776 abrogates ara-C-induced S-phase arrest, thereby enhancing ara-C-induced apoptosis in vitro.1 A phase I trial demonstrated the safety of MK-8876 in combination with infusional ara-C and correlative studies demonstrated increased ara-C-induced H2Ax phosphorylation in AML cells, consistent with unrepaired DNA damage.2 Herein, we report data from a phase II trial comparing ara-C plus MK8876 with ara-C alone. Methods: Patients with relapsed or refractory AML were randomized to receive either ara-C 2 gm/m2 via continuous infusion (CIV) over 72 hours on days 1 and 10 with MK-8776 100 mg flat dose infused over 30 minutes on days 2, 3, 11, and 12 (combo); or ara-C alone on the same schedule (control). The primary end point was response rate (CR+CRi). Adverse events (AEs) for all patients were reported according to the NCI-CTCAE version 4.0. Correlative studies were performed on blood and marrow samples collected prior to treatment on days 1, 2 and 3 and at one hour after MK-8776 infusion (PB only). Marrow and circulating blasts were analyzed using semi-quantitative flow cytometric determinations of blast cell gH2AX expression, a marker of DNA damage. Results: Thirty-two patients were treated at 4 sites with 14 assigned to the combo arm and 18 to the control arm. The study was stopped early due to lack of drug availability. The median age was 60 (range 29-72) and 17 (53%) were male. Nine (28%) had refractory AML, 16 (50%) were in first relapse, and 7 (22%) were in second relapse. Eleven (34%) had undergone a prior bone marrow transplant (BMT). Risk stratification classified 1 (3%) patient as favorable risk disease, 11 (34%) as intermediate-1, 8 (25%) as intermediate-2, and 11 (34%) as adverse risk. There were 5 (36%) responses (CR/CRi) and 1 (7%) partial response (PR) in the combo arm, and 8 (44%) responses and 1 (6%) PR in the control arm. Median survival did not differ significantly between the two groups (5.9 months in the combo arm vs. 4.2 months in the control arm). Sub-group analysis showed increased responses in the combo arm for the patients in first relapse (50% vs. 40%) and those with a prior BMT (50% vs. 29%). Most non-hematologic grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs were similar in the two groups including febrile neutropenia (64% vs. 61%), infectious complications (50% vs. 50%), and sepsis (21% vs. 17%). Patients in the combo arm experienced more QT prolongation (21% vs. 0%), hypertension (21% vs. 0%), and GI toxicities (21% vs. 0%); while those in the control arm had increased renal (0% vs. 11%) and liver toxicity (7% vs. 17%). Two deaths were attributed to treatment, and both were in the control arm. Eight combo patients had serial PB samples and 2 had serial marrow samples studied by flow cytometry. There was an increase in the percentage of gH2AX+ CD34+ cells on Day 2 directly after MK-8876 infusion (16.9% prior and 36.4% at one hour), which occurred to a lesser extent on Day 3 after MK-8876 infusion (12.7% prior and 15.6% at one hour). Three of eight patients demonstrated a sustained increase in gH2AX+ CD34+ from Day 2 to Day 3, and all three achieved either a PR or CR. Conclusion: This is the first phase II study building on prior work suggesting that inhibition of Chk1 would increase response to ara-C in patients with relapsed or refractory AML. The study confirmed that treatment with the combination is feasible with similar toxicities between the treatment and control groups. The response rates were similar between the two groups with improved responses in patients receiving the combo in first relapse and following BMT. Correlative studies support the finding that responding patients show a sustained increase in DNA damage and this may serve as a biomarker in future studies. Chk1 remains a potential target to improve treatment outcomes with ara-C. References: 1. Schenk EL et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Oct 1; 18(19):5364-73. 2. Karp JE et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Dec 15; 18(24):6723-31. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Among mechanisms underlying cytotoxic drug resistance is activation of diverse DNA damage response (DDR) pathways. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARP)-1/2 facilitate both single- and double-strand break (DSB) repair and play a key role in the base excision repair (BER) of chemotherapy-damaged DNA. The PARP inhibitor veliparib (V) potentiates the cytotoxicity of different chemotherapeutics, including temozolomide (TEM). TEM induces distinct alkylating events in neoplastic cells whose ultimate outcome depends on the interaction of BER, mismatch repair (MMR), O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), and DSB repair. While clinical activity of TEM has been mainly observed in MGMT-deficient AML, V potentiated cytotoxicity of TEM in leukemia cells in vitro in the setting of MGMT overexpression or deficient MMR pathway (Mol Cancer Ther, 2009). Methods: We conducted a Phase I study to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) of V+TEM, using a 3+3 dose escalation. Patients (pts) ≥60 years (yrs) with newly diagnosed poor cytogenetic-risk AML/ALL who were not candidates for intensive therapy, or ≥18 yrs with relapsed/refractory AML/ALL, secondary AML (therapy-related or arising from MDS or MPN), and CMMoL-2 were eligible. Any number of prior regimens, including allogeneic transplant (alloSCT), were allowed. V was given orally day (d)1 once, then twice a day on d4-12 at one of 6 dose levels (DL) (DL1A-B 20mg; DL2-DL3-DL4-DL5-DL6: 40-80-120-150-200 mg). TEM was given orally once a day on d3-9 (DL1A 150 mg/m2/d; DL1B-DL6 200 mg/m2/d). 28-day cycles (cy) were repeated depending on response/tolerability (4-6 weeks delay allowed) with V on d1-8 and TEM d1-5. TEM was taken on empty stomach with antiemetics and V was taken irrespective of meals. Results: Forty-nine pts with median age 69 yrs (range, 22-88; 47% ≥70) were treated. Of 47 AML pts, 29 (62%) had secondary AML and 27 (57%) adverse karyotype. Median number of prior treatments for AML was 1 (range, 0-6): 18 (38%) had median 1 prior therapy (range, 1-3) for MDS; 30 (64%), 9 (18%), 34 (69%) received hypomethylating agents, alloSCT and intensive chemotherapy, respectively. Overall 42 (85%) pts were refractory to their last treatment. Pts received a median of 1 (range, 1-7) cy of therapy. Two did not complete cy 1, pt withdrawal d5 and progressive fungal pneumonia d9 with death d15 of progressive disease (PD). The MTD/RP2D was defined at V 150 mg and TEM 200 mg/m2; 2 of 4 pts treated at V 200 mg and TEM 200 mg/m2 developed dose-limiting toxicity of grade (gr) 3 oral mucositis/esophagitis. The most frequent drug-related toxicities (NCI CTC v4) were gr 1/2 nausea/vomiting (39%), fatigue (26%), oropharyngeal mucositis (26%), constipation (12%), and diarrhea (10%). Other common toxicities were infectious, including febrile neutropenia (29%), pneumonia (20%), bacteremia (18%). One (2%) pt died ≤d30 and 12 (24%) ≤d60 mainly of PD (1 pt fungal pneumonia before count recovery d31). Overall response rate was 33% (complete remission (CR), hematologic improvement (HI)/stable disease) with 8 (16%) pts achieving CR (1 CRi). Median overall survival was 5.03 months, for all responders 11.58 months, and for CR pts 19.89 months (Fig 1). Responses occurred at all DLs. Three CR pts underwent alloSCT; 2 remain in CR at ~3 yrs. Pharmacokinetics (PK): V or TEM PKs were not altered with co-administration. There was a correlation between the DLT of mucositis and V single (Cmax P=0.005; AUC P=0.009) and multiple dose exposure (Cmax P = 0.02; AUC P=0.03). Pharmacodynamics and pharmacoepigenetics: Four of 39 pts examined had MGMT methylation (3 CR; 75%) and 2 had BRCA-1 methylation (1 HI) in peripheral blood (PB) or bone marrow (BM) mononuclear cells (MC). Defective FancD2 pathway was observed in the BMMC of 19/19 pts using FancD2 ubiquitylation assays but did not correlate with response. V reduced PAR levels by >75% in PBMC of most pts and in the presence of TEM. Induction of γ-H2AX in CD34+ cells was seen upon V/V+TEM treatment. Conclusion: V plus TEM demonstrated safety and activity in this resistant and elderly leukemia population. Response rate was higher in MGMT methylated pts, but responses were also seen in pts who had no MGMT methylation, had failed multiple therapies, had secondary AML and/or adverse karyotype. Future clinical study should aim to identify pts with defective DDR pathways who are most likely to respond to this therapeutic approach. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Off Label Use: Temozolomide is not approved for AML. Beumer:Millenium: Other: Research support. Gore:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Abstract Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have shown promising single-agent activity in ovarian cancers with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations (C. Scott, JCO 33:1397, 2015). Ongoing studies are testing the efficacy of PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancers with other genetic or epigenetic alterations that impair the homologous recombination (HR) pathway of DNA repair. It is less clear whether PARP inhibitor clinical activity can be enhanced in HR deficient cancers or even extended to HR proficient ovarian cancers through judicious combinations. Our preclinical studies have demonstrated that PARP inhibitors enhance the cytotoxic effects of selected therapeutic agents through a variety of mechanisms: By trapping PARP at sites of DNA damage, PARP inhibitors enhance the cytotoxicity of topotecan (A. Patel, J. Biol. Chem. 287: 4198, 2012).By inhibiting base excision repair, PARP inhibitors enhance the cytotoxicity of floxuridine (A. Huehls, Cancer Res. 71: 4944, 2011), an agent previously shown to have clinical activity in ovarian cancer. Building on the first of these observations, we conducted a phase 1 clinical trial of topotecan weekly x 3 in combination with veliparib (NCT01012817). Using a standard 3+3 design, patients were treated with veliparib PO twice daily on days 1-3, 8-10 and 15-17 and topotecan IV on days 2, 9 and 16 every 28 days. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia. The MTD was veliparib 300 mg PO twice daily and topotecan 3 mg/m2/dose. Among 52 evaluable patients, objective responses (1 CR, 3 PRs) and stable disease (22 patients, 6 lasting ≥ 8 cycles) were observed. While there was no clear correlation between germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and clinical benefit, a patient with a germline RAD51D mutation had stable disease for 14 cycles. A phase 2 cohort in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer has just opened. Building on the second set of preclinical observations, we are also conducting a phase 1 trial of veliparib and IP floxuridine in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer confined to the peritoneal cavity (NCT01749397). Using a rolling 6 design, patients are treated with veliparib PO twice daily on days 1-10 and floxuridine IP on days 3-5 every 21 days. The trial is currently enrolling at dose level 5 (veliparib 300 mg PO twice daily on days 1-10 and floxuridine 3 gm/dose IP on days 3-5). Grade 3 toxicities in any cycle have included nausea (1), fatigue (1) and neutropenia (3). Among 20 evaluable patients, treatment duration has ranged from 2-33 cycles. These studies, which build on two different aspects of PARP1 function, illustrate two different approaches to potentially enhancing the activity of PARP inhibitors in relapsed ovarian cancer. These studies were funded in part by NIH grants P50 CA136393, R01 CA190423, and UM1 CA186686 as well as SU2C-AACR DT16-15. Citation Format: Scott H. Kaufmann, Andrea E. Wahner Hendrickson, Maria I Harrell, Michael E. Menefee, Edward J. Tanner, David G, Mutch, Elizabeth M. Swisher, and Larry M. Karnitz. PARP INHIBITOR COMBINATIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF OVARIAN CANCER [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Ovarian Cancer Research Symposium; Sep 12-13, 2016; Seattle, WA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2017;23(11 Suppl):Abstract nr IS04.

Abstract Purpose: The PARP inhibitor veliparib delays DNA repair and potentiates cytotoxicity of multiple classes of chemotherapy drugs, including topoisomerase I inhibitors and platinating agents. This study evaluated veliparib incorporation into leukemia induction therapy using a previously described topotecan/carboplatin backbone. Experimental Design: Employing a 3+3 trial design, we administered escalating doses of veliparib combined with topotecan + carboplatin in relapsed or refractory acute leukemias, aggressive myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). Results: A total of 99 patients received veliparib 10–100 mg orally twice daily on days 1–8, 1–14, or 1–21 along with continuous infusion topotecan 1.0–1.2 mg/m2/d + carboplatin 120–150 mg/m2/d on days 3–7. The MTD was veliparib 80 mg twice daily for up to 21 days with topotecan 1.2 mg/m2/d + carboplatin 150 mg/m2/d. Mucositis was dose limiting and correlated with high veliparib concentrations. The response rate was 33% overall (33/99: 14 CR, 11 CRi, 8 PR) but was 64% (14/22) for patients with antecedent or associated aggressive MPNs or CMML. Leukemias with baseline DNA repair defects, as evidenced by impaired DNA damage–induced FANCD2 monoubiquitination, had improved survival [HR = 0.56 (95% confidence interval, 0.27–0.92)]. A single 80-mg dose of veliparib, as well as veliparib in combination with topotecan + carboplatin, induced DNA damage as manifested by histone H2AX phosphorylation in CD34+ leukemia cells, with greater phosphorylation in cells from responders. Conclusions: The veliparib/topotecan/carboplatin combination warrants further investigation, particularly in patients with aggressive MPNs, CMML, and MPN- or CMML-related acute leukemias. Clin Cancer Res; 23(4); 899–907. ©2016 AACR.

Abstract Purpose: In preclinical studies, the PARP inhibitor veliparib enhanced the antileukemic action of temozolomide through potentiation of DNA damage. Accordingly, we conducted a phase 1 study of temozolomide with escalating doses of veliparib in patients with relapsed, refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or AML arising from aggressive myeloid malignancies. Experimental Design: Patients received veliparib [20–200 mg once a day on day 1 and twice daily on days 4–12 in cycle 1 (days 1–8 in cycle ≥2)] and temozolomide [150–200 mg/m2 daily on days 3–9 in cycle 1 (days 1–5 in cycle ≥2)] every 28 to 56 days. Veliparib pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics [ability to inhibit poly(ADP-ribose) polymer (PAR) formation and induce H2AX phosphorylation] were assessed. Pretreatment levels of MGMT and PARP1 protein, methylation of the MGMT promoter, and integrity of the Fanconi anemia pathway were also examined. Results: Forty-eight patients were treated at seven dose levels. Dose-limiting toxicities were oral mucositis and esophagitis lasting >7 days. The MTD was veliparib 150 mg twice daily with temozolomide 200 mg/m2 daily. The complete response (CR) rate was 17% (8/48 patients). Veliparib exposure as well as inhibition of PAR polymer formation increased dose proportionately. A veliparib-induced increase in H2AX phosphorylation in CD34+ cells was observed in responders. Three of 4 patients with MGMT promoter methylation achieved CR. Conclusions: Veliparib plus temozolomide is well tolerated, with activity in advanced AML. Further evaluation of this regimen and of treatment-induced phosphorylation of H2AX and MGMT methylation as potential response predictors appears warranted. Clin Cancer Res; 23(3); 697–706. ©2016 AACR.

Abstract DNA damage and replication stress activate the ATR-Chk1 checkpoint signaling pathway in which ATR phosphorylates multiple substrates including the kinase Chk1. The ATR-Chk1 signaling pathway regulates DNA repair and cell cycle arrest and promotes the survival of tumor cells exposed to genotoxic chemotherapies. Accordingly, the ATR-Chk1 pathway has emerged as an attractive therapeutic target to increase the antitumor activities of chemotherapy agents, and selective ATR and Chk1 inhibitors have been developed. However, it remains unclear whether ATR and Chk1 inhibition are equally effective with genotoxic chemotherapies that have different mechanisms of action. Here, we compared ATR versus Chk1 inhibition in ovarian cancer cells exposed to agents (cisplatin, topotecan, gemcitabine, and PARP inhibitor) with different mechanisms of action that are used to treat this disease. We found that Chk1 inhibition selectively sensitized to gemcitabine, whereas ATR inhibition broadly sensitized to all chemotherapy agents. Importantly, ATR inhibition also robustly sensitized to PARP inhibitors even in cells with defective HR. These findings suggest that combining ATR inhibitors with these chemotherapy agents may a viable therapeutic strategy in HR-proficient and-deficient tumors. Citation Format: Larry M. Karnitz. Targeting checkpoint signaling and DNA repair in ovarian cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Ovarian Cancer Research: Exploiting Vulnerabilities; Oct 17-20, 2015; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2016;22(2 Suppl):Abstract nr IA07.