Rodrigues, Matheus Scarpatto

Abstract Background Tau‐PET provides critical topographic information on tau deposition in the living brain. Integrating research‐based practices into clinical settings through qualitative methods, such as visual reads, is becoming increasingly important. This study aims to compare the performance of existing visual reading methods for [ 18 F]Flortaucipir (FTP) and [ 18 F]MK‐6240 (MK) and provide preliminary data toward a unified visual reading approach for all tau‐PET tracers using a head‐to‐head dataset. Methods The study design and development plans are illustrated in Figure 1. To evaluate previously published visual reading methods, two blinded raters conducted FTP and MK visual reads on 340 participants from the HEAD study. A unified visual reading method was developed and tested on 101 participants, using a composite of adjusted Braak regions to determine 3 stages of severity while harmonizing between tracers. For external validation, the method will be tested on four additional cohorts, each using one of the following tracers: FTP, MK, PI, or RO. Results Inter‐rater agreement using previous methods (Figure 2A) showed high Cohen’s kappa values (0.71‐0.77) for the low and high tau burden categories in both FTP and MK visual reads. However, agreement was substantially lower in the non‐AD‐like category, leading to overall agreement rates of 0.55 for FTP and 0.69 for MK. In contrast, the method developed here improved inter‐rater agreement across all categories (0.87‐0.96) and introduced a moderate tau (0.79‐0.83) burden group (Figure 2B), leading to higher overall agreement rates of 0.81 for FTP and 0.87 for MK (Figure 2C). For inter‐tracer agreement (Figure 3), previous methods resulted in discordant visual reads for FTP and MK in 34.4% of cases for rater 1 and 24.7% for rater 2. The developed method reduced this disagreement to 11.9% (rater 1) and 15.8% (rater 2), demonstrating improved consistency across different tracers. Conclusion This study demonstrates that previously published visual reading methods produced varying classifications depending on the tracer used. The method proposed here improved inter‐rater and inter‐tracer visual read agreements by developing a unified, tracer‐agnostic approach easy to be used. Importantly, this clinician‐friendly method has the potential for widespread adoption, offering a single harmonized visual reading technique for all tau‐PET tracers.

Abstract Background One of the hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the progressive spread of tau pathology. However, heterogeneity in the spatial patterns of tau deposition at the individual level may contribute to distinct clinical presentations. Here, we investigated the different patterns of tau deposition across disease progression and the different cognitive profiles linked to these patterns. Method We investigated 106 tau PET positive individuals (16% cognitively unimpaired, 84% amnestic cognitively impaired) from the HEAD study using head‐to‐head Flortaucipir and MK6240 tau PET. For each tracer, we extracted the SUVR values from seven major brain networks: Limbic, Visual (Vis), Default Mode (Default), Dorsal Attention (DorsAttn), Frontoparietal, Somatomotor (SomMot) and Salience Ventral Attention (SalVentAttn) as well as the Entorhinal cortex. Pathways were identified by ranking regions from highest to lowest SUVR, with the region displaying the highest SUVR value being defined as the peak region. Individuals in late stages of tau deposition displaying distinct pathways were compared. Image averages and voxel‐wise group comparisons using tau negative individuals as the reference were generated for each pathway and tau PET tracer. Cognitive differences were assessed using ANOVA for MoCA score and domain‐specific composite scores for Memory, Attention and Visuospatial skills. Result In all individuals and tracers, tau in the Entorhinal cortex progressed to the Limbic network, supporting a common starting point for tau propagation. Beyond these initial stages, tau propagation followed three main distinct pathways following either the Vis, Default or DorsAttn networks (Figure 1). Voxel‐wise comparison between individuals across these three pathways captured clear and similar differences in tau PET uptake as measured with Flortaucipir and MK6240. (Figure 2). While MoCA and Memory scores did not differ between groups, individuals following the Vis network exhibited significantly lower Attention scores compared to those in the Default and DorsAttn networks. Additionally, individuals following the Vis network exhibited lower Visuospatial scores compared to the Default network group (Figure 3). Conclusion Our results indicate a model in which, although tau progresses hierarchically, its deposition peaks mainly follow specific networks, which drive tau deposition and, consequently, the clinical manifestations of AD.

Abstract Background We showed that astrocyte reactivity, as measured by plasma GFAP levels, influences Aβ mediated tau PET pathology in cognitively unimpaired (CU) Aβ‐positive individuals. However, the link between GFAP and tau PET in individuals without detectable Aβ pathology remains elusive. The aim of the current study is to investigate the association between plasma GFAP and tau PET in CU Aβ PET‐negative individuals. Method We studied 147 CU Aβ PET‐negative participants from the HEAD cohort with plasma GFAP and p ‐tau217, as well as tau PET Flortaucipir and MK6240 data. Aβ positivity was determined by Aβ PET visual reading and Centiloid 12. Voxel‐wise linear regression models adjusted for age and sex tested the association of plasma GFAP and p ‐tau217 with tau PET. Further, the associations of plasma GFAP with peak tau PET SUVR values extracted from voxel‐wise association were fitted with a linear regression model adjusted for age and sex. Result Voxel‐wise analysis showed that plasma GFAP levels, but not plasma p ‐tau217 levels, were associated with tau PET in the medial temporal lobe (e.g., amygdala, entorhinal cortex, hippocampus) predominantly for Flortaucipir tau PET [Figure 1A, B, C, D]. The association between plasma p ‐tau217 and tau PET was weak in Aβ‐negative individuals. These results were similar when Aβ positivity was defined based on Centiloid 12. Furthermore, plasma GFAP and peak tau PET SUVR of Flortaucipir showed stronger association than that of MK6240 [Flortaucipir: β=0.4017, p <0.0001; MK6240: β=0.194, p = 0.0424; Figure 2A, B]. Conclusion We found an association between GFAP levels and tau PET uptake in individuals not expected to exhibit high levels of tau tangle‐related tracer uptake. Further analysis will be designed to elucidate the underpinning of this association, which could represent low levels of tau pathology, astrogliosis, or other factors.

Abstract Background Quantifying tau aggregates in the human brain can be achieved using Positron Emission Tomography (PET) techniques, which can potentially be affected by binding competition due to medication use. Patients with dementia often have high rates of comorbidities and polypharmacy. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the potential influence of multiple medications on the uptake of the tau tracers MK6240 (MK) and Flortaucipir (FTP). Method Five classes of medications were evaluated: Anti‐Hypertensives, Statins, Anti‐Diabetics, Psychoactive drugs, and NSAIDs (Table 1). We included 292 individuals [170 cognitively unimpaired (CU) Aβ‐negative and 122 cognitively impaired (CI) Aβ‐positive] from the HEAD study (Table 2). We compared MK and FTP SUVR in the Medial Temporal Lobe (MTL) and Neotemporal Cortex (NTC) in individuals on and off medications. The linear regressions that tested associations were corrected for confounding factors, including age, sex, education, and MoCA score. Correction for multiple comparisons was applied using the Bonferroni method (adjusted p ‐value at 0.00125). Result Among CI Aβ‐positive individuals, Anti‐Diabetics were associated with lower SUVR in the NTC for both FTP and MK. However, these associations did not remain significant after correction for multiple comparisons. (Table 3). Conclusion Our findings indicate that there are no significant associations between the use of the medications studied and MK or FTP uptake when accounting for covariates and applying multiple comparison corrections.

Abstract Background Many risk factors can contribute to the occurrence of Alzheimer`s Disease (AD). However, little is known about the impact of dementia risk factors to the uptake of tau‐PET tracers. Therefore, in this work we aim to investigate the influence of dementia risk factors and comorbidities on 18 F‐Flortaucipir (FTP) and 18 F‐MK6240 (MK) tau‐PET tracers’ uptake. Additionally, we will assess how these factors impact the association of tau‐PET and cognition. Method We accessed 436 individuals across the aging and AD spectrum (251 amyloid negative and 185 amyloid positive) from the HEAD study, with available Aβ‐PET, FTP, MK, and clinical assessments. Linear regression models corrected for age, sex, clinical diagnosis, and study site tested the association of factors with tau‐PET tracers in the medial temporal lobe (MTL). A tau‐PET × risk factor term was added to test the influence of risk factors to the association of tau with cognition. Result In amyloid‐β negative individuals, high BMI were positively associated with the uptake of both FTP and MK, whereas hearing loss were positively associated only with MK in the MTL (Figure 1A). In amyloid‐β positive individuals, high body mass index (BMI), hearing loss and sleep disorders were negatively associated with the uptake of both tau‐PET tracers in the MTL. On the other hand, hypertension showed negative association only with MK uptake (Figure 1B). Using Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores as outcome, we observed that amyloid‐β negative individuals with high BMI showed worse cognitive performance as a function of both MK and FTP in the MTL, whereas individuals with vision impairment and hearing loss showed worse cognitive performance as a function of MK only (Figure 2A). Amyloid‐β positive individuals with hypercholesterolemia and hypertension presented worse cognitive performance as a function of both MK and FTP in the MTL (Figure 2B). Conclusion In this preliminary analysis, sleep disorders, hypertension, and high BMI were independently associated with tau‐PET tracer uptake, with the effects varying according to amyloid‐β pathology. These prevalent factors in the elderly also changed the association between tau‐PET and cognition, underscoring the need for further studies to better understand their role in modulating this relationship.

Abstract Background The Alzheimer's disease (AD) Braak staging is a key framework for classifying tau pathology progression in AD based on histopathological post‐mortem brain examinations. However, adapting it to PET imaging can be challenging due to differences in tracer uptake patterns and binding properties, which affect sensitivity, specificity, and regional staging. This study compares Braak staging across four tau PET tracers: Flortaucipir, MK6240, PI2620, and RO948. Methods We assessed 90 participants across the AD spectrum (46 CU, 31 MCI, 13 dementia; mean age 66.1 ± 7.8) using Aβ PET and four tau PET tracers: (Flortaucipir, MK6240, PI2620, and RO948). Braak positivity was defined based on Aβ− CU individuals (mean +2.5 SD, SUVR). To evaluate systematic bias and agreement between tracers, we computed pairwise differences at corresponding Braak stage estimates and applied the Bland‐Altman method to assess mean bias and limits of agreement. Additionally, Tau PET Braak region trajectories were modeled as functions of Aβ burden (Centiloid scale) using the Lowess method. Results Braak stage trajectories as a function of Aβ differ depending on the tracer and the sequential order of abnormality is highly variable. For instance, while for MK6240, RO948 and PI2620, Braak I is the first region to became abnormal, for Flortaucipir the earliest region to became abnormal is Braak IV (Figure 1). This variable pattern of abnormality impacts in the concordance of Braak staging between tracers with the highest Braak staging agreement resulting in concordance levels of approximately 70%. The highest levels of agreement between tracers usually happen at Braak 0 or Braak IV‐V, with intermediate stages showing very low concordance (Figure 2). The Bland‐Altman analysis identified wide limits of agreement, suggesting high variability and high tracer‐specific differences (Figure 3). On the other hand, it also identified that mean differences between tracers were small, indicating minimal systematic bias. Conclusion These preliminary findings reveal discrepancies in Braak staging when comparing Flortaucipir, MK6240, PI2620 and RO948. These findings suggest that while the tracers provide comparable stages on average, they may not be fully interchangeable in individual cases.

AbstractBackgroundTau PET provides continuous measurements of tau tangle pathology in the human brain. However, establishing cutoffs is crucial for selecting individuals for treatment in clinical trials or practice. In the absence of postmortem data, PET cutoffs must be established using statistical methods based on what is considered normal tracer uptake. In this study, we tested the impact of various methods to determine tau positivity using two different tau PET tracers in individuals scanned head‐to‐head.MethodsWe studied 147 individuals from Head‐to‐Head Harmonization of Tau Tracers in Alzheimer's Disease (HEAD) study with tau tangle PET scans with [18F]Flortaucipir and [18F]MK‐6240, and amyloid‐β (Aβ) PET. Tau deposition was measured with the standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) of each agent in the Medial Temporal Lobe (MTL) and the Entorhinal Cortex (EC). To determine Tau positivity three different methods were used: >2.5 standard deviations (SD) than the mean of the young, >1.5 SD mean of the cognitively unimpaired (CU) and >1.5 SD mean of CUAβ‐.ResultsDemographic characteristics of the study population are reported in Table 1. Using the cutoff >2.5 SD mean of young, [18F]Flortaucipir was positive in 35 (23.8%) and 69 (46.9%) individuals in the EC and MTL, respectively. [18F]MK‐6240 was positive in 49 (33.3%) and 58 (39.5%) individuals in EC and in MTL. Using >1.5 SD mean of CUAβ‐, [18F]Flortaucipir was positive in 38 (25.9%) and 45 (30.6%) individuals in EC and MTL, while [18F]MK‐6240 was positive in 51 (34.7%) and 50 (34.0%) in EC and in MTL (Figure 1).ConclusionsOur findings indicate variations in tau positivity when employing different methods based on either the young or CUAβ‐. [18F]Flortaucipir exhibited a higher rate of positive results when the method based on young individuals was applied in the MTL. Conversely, [18F]MK‐6240 showed more consistent and generally higher positivity when other methods were used for cutoff determination and/or in the EC region. Further research with a larger sample size is required to gain a better understanding of the optimal cutoff determination methods for these tracers.

AbstractBackgroundUtilizing PET amyloid‐beta (Aβ) and tau for staging Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) has demonstrated potential in identifying individuals with varying degrees of disease severity, applicable to both clinical trials and practice. However, the diverse binding characteristics of tau tracers pose challenges to the application of this staging across different ligands. In this study, we evaluate a novel staging framework proposed by the AA working group, employing Aβ PET and either [18F]MK6240 or [18F]Flortaucipir in individuals participating in a head‐to‐head study of tau PET tracers. This will provide insights into the robustness of this framework when applied across different tau ligands.MethodWe evaluated 154 people (89 CU and 65 CI), with MK6240, Flortaucipir, Aβ‐PET, MRI. SUVRs used inferior cerebellar gray as reference. Participants were categorized in Aβ positivity(A), using visual read, and tau positivity (T) in medial temporal lobe(MTL) and neocortex(NEO). Tau MTL(TMTL) and NEO positivity were defined as average +3 SD of youngs. NEO moderate(TMOD) and high(THIGH) was defined as below and above median SUVR of NEO‐positive individuals. Individuals were grouped as: A‐T‐, A+T‐, A+TMTL+(early), A+TMOD+(intermediary), and A+THIGH+(advanced).ResultsWe found that the distribution of the number of individuals across the five AD stages was comparable when using both MK6240 and Flortaucipir tracers (Figure 1). However, upon examining the concordance within each group, we found a low concordance of 30% (3/10) between tracers in the early tau stage (A+TMTL+). Concordance increased in the intermediary stage A+TMOD+, with a rate of 65% (9/14), and further increased to 79% (11/14) in the advanced stage (A+THIGH+). The A+T‐ group exhibited the highest concordance between tracer results, at 95% (21/22).ConclusionOur findings indicate that the application of this framework across different populations using different tau tracers can lead to a compatible distribution among groups. However, in a direct comparison, we noted that this did not necessarily result in high concordance between groups, as group shifts were observed that depended on the cutoffs used (data not shown). These results emphasize the necessity for harmonization of tau PET tracers prior to their utilization for stage determination.

AbstractBackgroundIdentification of cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals who may progress to mild cognitive impairment (MCI), is a pressing issue in the Alzheimer’s disease (AD) field, since therapeutic interventions may be more effective in the absence of cognitive impairment and neurodegeneration. CU individuals positive for amyloid and tau PET are very likely in the AD pathway. In out‐patient cognitive screening, we use rapid and simple tests such as The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) ‐ a composite of executive, visuospatial, naming, attention, language, abstraction, delayed recall, and orientation performances. We hypothesize that sub‐categorizing the CU group based on the presence of amyloid (A) and tau (T) pathologies, as measured by PET, can reveal subtle cognitive deficits, even in a clinical test with low sensitivity such as MoCA.MethodWe included 88 CU [defined as CDR global score of 0] older adults with available head‐to‐head MK6240 tau‐PET and Flortaucipir tracers from the ongoing HEAD multi‐site observational study. They also underwent Amyloid PET imaging using PiB or NAV4694. MoCA testing was done around the imaging time. To increase similarity with clinical practice, Amyloid and Tau PET positivity was defined using visual reads. Based on tracer uptake status, we categorized the individuals into A‐T‐, A‐T+, A+T‐ and A‐T‐ groups. Unpaired t‐test and one‐way ANOVA were used to test for significant differences between groups.Result2‐tailed p‐values were significant between the A‐T‐ group and the A+T+ group for MoCA total score [p: 0.0025 and p: 0.0025]. When we stratified MoCA in the different cognitive domains, we found that the results were driven by MoCA (memory) Delayed Recall score [p: 0.0007 and p: 0.0162]. A‐T+ vs A+T+ was also significant [p: 0.0099] for MoCA Delayed Recall. Both tau tracers (MK6240 and Flortaucipir) showed similar performance for determining T+ and identifying cognitive decline.ConclusionMoCA, a simple and commonly administered in‐office neuropsychological test, can detect subtle cognitive dysfunction in CU older adults who are Aβ and tau positive (A+/T+). These CU A+/T+ individuals are likely on the path to developing AD dementia.

AbstractBackgroundTau PET provides continuous measurements of tau tangle pathology in the human brain. However, establishing cutoffs is crucial for selecting individuals for treatment in clinical trials or practice. In the absence of postmortem data, PET cutoffs must be established using statistical methods based on what is considered normal tracer uptake. In this study, we tested the impact of various methods to determine tau positivity using two different tau PET tracers in individuals scanned head‐to‐head.MethodsWe studied 147 individuals from Head‐to‐Head Harmonization of Tau Tracers in Alzheimer's Disease (HEAD) study with tau tangle PET scans with [18F]Flortaucipir and [18F]MK‐6240, and amyloid‐ß (Aß) PET. Tau deposition was measured with the standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) of each agent in the Medial Temporal Lobe (MTL) and the Entorhinal Cortex (EC). To determine Tau positivity three different methods were used: >2.5 standard deviations (SD) than the mean of the young, >1.5 SD mean of the cognitively unimpaired (CU) and >1.5 SD mean of CUAß‐.ResultsDemographic characteristics of the study population are reported in Table 1. Using the cutoff >2.5 SD mean of young, [18F]Flortaucipir was positive in 35 (23.8%) and 69 (46.9%) individuals in the EC and MTL, respectively. [18F]MK‐6240 was positive in 49 (33.3%) and 58 (39.5%) individuals in EC and in MTL. Using >1.5 SD mean of CUAß‐, [18F]Flortaucipir was positive in 38 (25.9%) and 45 (30.6%) individuals in EC and MTL, while [18F]MK‐6240 was positive in 51 (34.7%) and 50 (34.0%) in EC and in MTL (Figure 1).ConclusionsOur findings indicate variations in tau positivity when employing different methods based on either the young or CUAß‐. [18F]Flortaucipir exhibited a higher rate of positive results when the method based on young individuals was applied in the MTL. Conversely, [18F]MK‐6240 showed more consistent and generally higher positivity when other methods were used for cutoff determination and/or in the EC region. Further research with a larger sample size is required to gain a better understanding of the optimal cutoff determination methods for these tracers.