Bellaver, Bruna

Abstract Background Precise cross‐tracer harmonization of tau PET imaging is essential for comparing tau burden across different tracers and studies. Here, we evaluated the performance of the universal tau PET scale (Uniτ) in harmonizing Flortaucipir, MK6240, PI2620, and RO948 tau PET images into a universal scale. Method We assessed 485 individuals across aging and AD spectrum scanned head‐to‐head with Flortaucipir and MK6240, and a subset of 90 individuals with additional PI2620 and RO948. We generated tau PET SUVRs using the inferior cerebellar gray matter as reference with a common 8mm FWHM. We estimated Uniτ parameters on a training set ( n = 200) by fitting a smoothed hyperbolic tangent equation to the Meta‐Temporal ROI anchored in the mean SUVR of young participants and the 90th percentile from cognitively impaired individuals. We compared tau positivity on the Uniτ scale with classifications from SUVRs (mean + 3 SD from Youngs). We applied the same equation to all brain voxels to generate Uniτ 3D images. Then, we extracted mean Uniτ values for key ROIs and correlated them with ROI‐based Uniτ values to evaluate voxel‐wise estimates. Result Using tracer‐specific parameters, Uniτ harmonized Flortaucipir, MK6240, PI2620, and RO948 to the same scale, aligning values near the identity line and confirming its applicability across tau PET tracers (Figure 1). For Flortaucipir, Uniτ tau positivity matched original SUVR classifications (ground truth), with only one mismatch for MK6240 (Figure 1). Applying the Uniτ transformation to all brain voxels effectively harmonized 3D images to a common scale, reducing visual variabilities (Figure 2). Furthermore, ROI‐based estimates and those extracted from the 3D Uniτ images were identical (Figure 3). Conclusion Our results indicate that tau PET tracers can be harmonized to a common scale using a large head‐to‐head dataset. The Uniτ scale can harmonize entire 3D tau PET images, suggesting that there is no need to use pre‐established ROIs, which would constrain the analysis to a few brain regions. Uniτ is freely accessible across platforms ( www.unitau.app ) for ROI and 3D tau PET harmonization.

Abstract Background Many risk factors can contribute to the occurrence of Alzheimer`s Disease (AD). However, little is known about the impact of dementia risk factors to the uptake of tau‐PET tracers. Therefore, in this work we aim to investigate the influence of dementia risk factors and comorbidities on 18 F‐Flortaucipir (FTP) and 18 F‐MK6240 (MK) tau‐PET tracers’ uptake. Additionally, we will assess how these factors impact the association of tau‐PET and cognition. Method We accessed 436 individuals across the aging and AD spectrum (251 amyloid negative and 185 amyloid positive) from the HEAD study, with available Aβ‐PET, FTP, MK, and clinical assessments. Linear regression models corrected for age, sex, clinical diagnosis, and study site tested the association of factors with tau‐PET tracers in the medial temporal lobe (MTL). A tau‐PET × risk factor term was added to test the influence of risk factors to the association of tau with cognition. Result In amyloid‐β negative individuals, high BMI were positively associated with the uptake of both FTP and MK, whereas hearing loss were positively associated only with MK in the MTL (Figure 1A). In amyloid‐β positive individuals, high body mass index (BMI), hearing loss and sleep disorders were negatively associated with the uptake of both tau‐PET tracers in the MTL. On the other hand, hypertension showed negative association only with MK uptake (Figure 1B). Using Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores as outcome, we observed that amyloid‐β negative individuals with high BMI showed worse cognitive performance as a function of both MK and FTP in the MTL, whereas individuals with vision impairment and hearing loss showed worse cognitive performance as a function of MK only (Figure 2A). Amyloid‐β positive individuals with hypercholesterolemia and hypertension presented worse cognitive performance as a function of both MK and FTP in the MTL (Figure 2B). Conclusion In this preliminary analysis, sleep disorders, hypertension, and high BMI were independently associated with tau‐PET tracer uptake, with the effects varying according to amyloid‐β pathology. These prevalent factors in the elderly also changed the association between tau‐PET and cognition, underscoring the need for further studies to better understand their role in modulating this relationship.

Abstract Background Tau PET measures are inherently continuous and applying dichotomized thresholds introduces conceptual and analytical idiosyncrasies. Understanding the limitations in the transition from tau‐negative to tau‐positive classifications is crucial for the effective use of these thresholds. This study aims to determine the confidence levels of tau PET thresholds of abnormality for different tau PET tracers by characterizing their "gray zone" using the universal tau PET scale (Uniτ, www.unitau.app ). Method We evaluated 485 individuals across the aging and AD spectrum from the HEAD study, with head‐to‐head scans for MK6240 and Flortaucipir. Uniτ estimates were derived from the Meta‐Temporal ROI. Tau positivity (T+) was defined as Uniτ values exceeding the mean plus 3 SD of individuals younger than 28 years ( n = 24). Two physicians independently performed a visual assessment of tau positivity for each tracer, with agreement indicating clear tau pathology (TVR+). Logistic regression was used to estimate the probability of TVR+ across Uniτ values for each tracer ( n = 189, CU elderly Aβ‐ and CI Aβ+). Individuals were classified as negative, positive, or within a "gray zone" between the most liberal T+ threshold and varying TVR+ probability thresholds (50%, 75%, 90%, 95%, and 99%). Result The Uniτ gray zone, defined as a function of TVR+ probabilities, demonstrated consistency between the two tracers, with differences observed only in the decimal range. The most liberal Uniτ threshold for T+ was 11.0 for both MK6240 and Flortaucipir, closely matching the 50% TVR+ probability threshold (11.1 for MK6240 and 11.7 for Flortaucipir). Higher TVR+ probabilities corresponded to increased Uniτ values with MK6240 and Flortaucipir showing near‐identical values between the tracers: 14.2 and 14.8 for 75%, 17.3 and 17.9 for 90%, 19.4 and 19.9 for 95%, and 24.1 and 24.6 for 99%, respectively (Figure 1). In total, 26 participants fell within the gray zone for MK6240, compared to 47 participants for Flortaucipir. Conclusion These findings highlight the potential of Uniτ to provide a standardized approach for assessing tau positivity across tracers. By combining quantitative Uniτ measures with visual assessments, we enhance the understanding of tau positivity certainty, particularly in the transition between negative and positive classifications.

Abstract Background The Alzheimer's disease (AD) Braak staging is a key framework for classifying tau pathology progression in AD based on histopathological post‐mortem brain examinations. However, adapting it to PET imaging can be challenging due to differences in tracer uptake patterns and binding properties, which affect sensitivity, specificity, and regional staging. This study compares Braak staging across four tau PET tracers: Flortaucipir, MK6240, PI2620, and RO948. Methods We assessed 90 participants across the AD spectrum (46 CU, 31 MCI, 13 dementia; mean age 66.1 ± 7.8) using Aβ PET and four tau PET tracers: (Flortaucipir, MK6240, PI2620, and RO948). Braak positivity was defined based on Aβ− CU individuals (mean +2.5 SD, SUVR). To evaluate systematic bias and agreement between tracers, we computed pairwise differences at corresponding Braak stage estimates and applied the Bland‐Altman method to assess mean bias and limits of agreement. Additionally, Tau PET Braak region trajectories were modeled as functions of Aβ burden (Centiloid scale) using the Lowess method. Results Braak stage trajectories as a function of Aβ differ depending on the tracer and the sequential order of abnormality is highly variable. For instance, while for MK6240, RO948 and PI2620, Braak I is the first region to became abnormal, for Flortaucipir the earliest region to became abnormal is Braak IV (Figure 1). This variable pattern of abnormality impacts in the concordance of Braak staging between tracers with the highest Braak staging agreement resulting in concordance levels of approximately 70%. The highest levels of agreement between tracers usually happen at Braak 0 or Braak IV‐V, with intermediate stages showing very low concordance (Figure 2). The Bland‐Altman analysis identified wide limits of agreement, suggesting high variability and high tracer‐specific differences (Figure 3). On the other hand, it also identified that mean differences between tracers were small, indicating minimal systematic bias. Conclusion These preliminary findings reveal discrepancies in Braak staging when comparing Flortaucipir, MK6240, PI2620 and RO948. These findings suggest that while the tracers provide comparable stages on average, they may not be fully interchangeable in individual cases.

Abstract Background Tau‐PET tracers have been used to monitor the progression of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, different tracers present distinct patterns of binding throughout the brain, challenging the harmonization of their findings. Leveraging the HEAD Study, the largest head‐to‐head study of tau‐PET tracers, we recently developed the Uniτ scale, which cross‐sectionally harmonizes Flortaucipir and MK6240 onto a universal tau‐PET measurement. Here, we provide a preliminary evaluation of the Uniτ scale’s longitudinal performance in HEAD and two independent cohorts. Methods We assessed 422 individuals across the AD spectrum with longitudinal tau‐PET from three cohorts: HEAD [13 cognitively unimpaired (CU), 9 cognitively impaired (CI) individuals, scanned head‐to‐head with Flortaucipir and MK6240], ADNI [74 CU, 208 CI, tracer: Flortaucipir], and TRIAD [72 CU, 46 CI, tracer: MK6240]. Standardized uptake ratios (SUVRs) were harmonized to Uniτ using the Uniτ Ecosystem ( unitau.app ). Braak I‐II and the Meta‐Temporal regions were used as regions of interest. Annual tau‐PET uptake change was calculated, and the effect size was defined as the mean annual change divided by its standard deviation. Results In HEAD, annual change in tau‐PET uptake in Braak I‐II across CU and CI was only detectable in MK6240 (Figure 1A). However, both tracers detected significant annual changes in the Meta‐Temporal ROI for CI (Figure 1B). In both ADNI (Flortaucipir) and TRIAD (MK6240), changes in tau‐PET uptake in Braak I‐II regions were not significant (Figures 2‐3A). However, across all cohorts, the Meta‐Temporal ROI consistently showed detectable annual tau‐PET increases—most pronounced among CI—leading to larger effect sizes than in Braak I‐II (Figures 1‐3B). The Uniτ harmonization did not fundamentally alter the pattern of the findings. However, in ADNI (Flortaucipir), Uniτ yielded a slightly higher effect size than SUVR in CU for both Braak I‐II and Meta‐Temporal regions. Conclusion In this large longitudinal sample, our findings confirm that Flortaucipir and MK6240 can detect tau PET changes over time likely associated with the progression of tau tangle pathology. While MK6240 appears to show greater progression in CU, both tracers progress similarly in CI. Our data also suggested that Uniτ harmonized tau PET measurements maintain the longitudinal characteristics of each tau PET tracer for use in clinical trials.

AbstractBackgroundTau‐PET tracers have been used to diagnose and stage Alzheimer’s disease. However, different tau tracers present distinct patterns of binding throughout the brain, challenging the harmonization of their results. We hypothesize that the choice of a reference region can impact the harmonization of the tau‐PET standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR). In this context, we aimed to explore how different cerebellar reference regions impact the association between [18F]Flortaucipir and [18F]MK‐6240 SUVR values.MethodWe studied 185 individuals across the aging and AD spectrum with head‐to‐head Flortaucipir and MK‐6240 tau PET (HEAD Study). SUVRs were processed to a common 8mm FWHM using 15 different reference regions defined in the spatially unbiased atlas template of the cerebellum (SUIT) (Diedrichsen, 2009). Regression models investigated the association between Flortaucipir and MK‐6240 using multiple combinations of reference regions. R2 statistic was used to estimate goodness‐of‐fitting.Result225 combinations of associations Flortaucipir and MK‐6240 SUVR were tested, where the SUVRs are not necessarily quantified using the same reference region. Figure 1 presents the top 25 strongest and 25 weakest associations, ordered based on the coefficient of determination (R²). Flortaucipir and MK‐6240 exhibited the most robust associations when the inferior cerebellar gray matter or Crus I were employed for SUVR determination (R2=0.89, Figure 1‐2). Conversely, combinations incorporating the fastigial region consistently yielded weaker associations between the two tracers (R2<0.70, Figure 1‐2).ConclusionInterestingly, we showed that the inferior cerebellum, when used for both tracers, serves as a robust reference region for determining the most similar SUVRs for Flortaucipir and MK‐6240. Notably, these two regions have been commonly utilized in previous studies involving these tau tracers. Our results imply that the inferior cerebellum could be the optimal reference region for research aimed at harmonizing tau PET tracers using statistical scales.

AbstractBackgroundTau‐PET tracers allow for in vivo Braak staging of individuals in the Alzheimer’s disease (AD) continuum. The impact of tracers’ characteristics for Braak staging using tau‐PET remains unclear. Therefore, we performed a head‐to‐head comparison of Braak staging using first‐ and second‐generation tau‐PET tracers.MethodWe assessed 51 cognitively unimpaired (CU) and 49 cognitively impaired participants (mean [SD] age 69.4 [7.5] years) with at least two tau‐PET ligands ([18F]MK6240, [18F]AV1451, and/or [18F]RO948) at McGill University, as part of the HEAD study. We calculated standardized uptake value ratios (SUVR) in Braak‐like regions of interest (ROI) for each ligand and investigated their association using Spearman’s correlation. Thresholds defined the presence of tauopathy in each Braak ROI, which was used to assign a Braak stage to each participant. Finally, we assessed the agreement between the Braak staging provided by each tracer, both for the traditional (using separate Braak stages – 0, I, II, III, IV, V, and VI) and simplified (using joint Braak stages – 0, I‐II, III‐IV, and V‐VI) frameworks.ResultIn all Braak ROIs, we found positive correlations between the SUVR values of the three tracers (Figure 1). The strongest correlation was between [18F]MK6240 and [18F]RO948 in Braak II (r=0.94), and the weakest between [18F]AV1451 and [18F]RO948 in VI (r=0.51). Inter‐tracer agreement regarding the latest stage of abnormality was substantial or nearly perfect between pairs of tracers but moderate between the three tracers (Figure 2A). The simplified framework presented greater agreement compared to traditional Braak staging, except between [18F]MK6240 and [18F]RO948. At the ROI level, the lowest agreements were observed for Braak II and I‐II, when [18F]MK6240 and [18F]RO948 were compared to [18F]AV1451 (Figure 2B‐C). [18F]AV1451 had the highest probability of overestimating the Braak stage assigned by [18F]MK6240 and by [18F]RO948, especially at earlier stages (Figure 3).ConclusionThe ligands presented moderate to nearly perfect agreement for in vivo staging of AD severity. Off‐target binding of [18F]AV1451 to the choroid plexus might explain disagreements at early stages. Overall, slight improvements in agreements were achieved with the simplified framework, as observed in histopathological staging.

AbstractBackgroundThe HEAD study focuses on collecting an extensive dataset from various tau‐PET tracers, aiming to establish robust anchor values, which are essential for harmonizing tau‐PET measurements. Here, we aim to showcase the capability of converting 3D tau‐PET images into a common scale using the Universal Tau‐PET Scale, Uniτ (tau), and to use these 3D images to subsequently obtain ROIs as needed.MethodsWe assessed 185 individuals across the aging and AD spectrum from the HEAD study, with [18F]Flortaucipir and [18F]MK‐6240 tau‐PET tracers. Tau‐PET SUVR images were standardized to a common 8mm FWHM, using the inferior cerebellar gray matter as the reference region. We generated Uniτ Tau‐PET 3D images using a single formula based on Meta‐temporal parameters in two steps: first, within‐tracer anchoring based on young (<25 years) and cognitively impaired individuals; second, between‐tracer anchoring using a piecewise transformation from [18F]Flortaucipir to [18F]MK‐6240, with smoothing at the piecewise inflection point. Subsequently, we extracted mean Uniτ values from these 3D images for key ROIs, including meta‐temporal, mesial, temporo‐parietal, frontal, and Braak stages III‐VI. Finally, we correlated Uniτ values across ROIs between the two tracers to evaluate the accuracy of estimates from the voxel‐wise transformation.ResultsThe original SUVR images present large differences between the two tau‐PET tracers (Figure 1). However, upon applying the Uniτ piecewise transformation with smoothing to all brain voxels, we were able to reasonably harmonize these images to the Uniτ scale, substantially reducing visual variability. Notably, the mean Uniτ values for the ROIs extracted from these harmonized 3D tau‐PET brain images demonstrated a high level of association between the two tracers (Figure 2). Furthermore, estimates generated from ROIs or extracted from our 3D parametric Uniτ model yielded identical estimates (Figure 3).ConclusionThe strong associations between tracers after directly harmonizing 3D images to Uniτ scale using the piecewise transformation with smoothing, underscore the effectiveness of the proposed method. This approach provides a reliable and standardized way to compare tau‐PET data across different tracers. Our results indicate the feasibility of harmonizing 3D tau‐PET images without relying on pre‐established ROIs, overcoming the limitation of restricting the analysis to only few brain regions.

AbstractBackgroundTau PET provides continuous measurements of tau tangle pathology in the human brain. However, establishing cutoffs is crucial for selecting individuals for treatment in clinical trials or practice. In the absence of postmortem data, PET cutoffs must be established using statistical methods based on what is considered normal tracer uptake. In this study, we tested the impact of various methods to determine tau positivity using two different tau PET tracers in individuals scanned head‐to‐head.MethodsWe studied 147 individuals from Head‐to‐Head Harmonization of Tau Tracers in Alzheimer's Disease (HEAD) study with tau tangle PET scans with [18F]Flortaucipir and [18F]MK‐6240, and amyloid‐β (Aβ) PET. Tau deposition was measured with the standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) of each agent in the Medial Temporal Lobe (MTL) and the Entorhinal Cortex (EC). To determine Tau positivity three different methods were used: >2.5 standard deviations (SD) than the mean of the young, >1.5 SD mean of the cognitively unimpaired (CU) and >1.5 SD mean of CUAβ‐.ResultsDemographic characteristics of the study population are reported in Table 1. Using the cutoff >2.5 SD mean of young, [18F]Flortaucipir was positive in 35 (23.8%) and 69 (46.9%) individuals in the EC and MTL, respectively. [18F]MK‐6240 was positive in 49 (33.3%) and 58 (39.5%) individuals in EC and in MTL. Using >1.5 SD mean of CUAβ‐, [18F]Flortaucipir was positive in 38 (25.9%) and 45 (30.6%) individuals in EC and MTL, while [18F]MK‐6240 was positive in 51 (34.7%) and 50 (34.0%) in EC and in MTL (Figure 1).ConclusionsOur findings indicate variations in tau positivity when employing different methods based on either the young or CUAβ‐. [18F]Flortaucipir exhibited a higher rate of positive results when the method based on young individuals was applied in the MTL. Conversely, [18F]MK‐6240 showed more consistent and generally higher positivity when other methods were used for cutoff determination and/or in the EC region. Further research with a larger sample size is required to gain a better understanding of the optimal cutoff determination methods for these tracers.