Dhaliwal, Jasninder Singh

Introduction: Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) is a major global health issue, with smoking as a significant modifiable risk factor. Smoking cessation reduces recurrent coronary events, making it crucial in ACS management. Current protocols recommend smoking cessation education during hospitalization and referral to smoking cessation or outpatient cardiac rehabilitation programs, where nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and bupropion are available. NRT, including patches, gum, and lozenges, helps alleviate withdrawal symptoms by providing a controlled nicotine dose. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that cautious initiation of NRT during hospitalization benefits ACS patients, with the benefits outweighing the risks. This study seeks to provide clarity and contribute to evidence-based guidelines for ACS management. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, data were gathered from the TriNetX database. The study compared two cohorts: 122,198 patients who received NRT and were hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or unstable angina (UA), and 160,387 patients who did not receive NRT but were admitted for the same conditions. The follow-up period began on the day of the index event and continued for 30 days. Cardiovascular outcomes were compared between propensity score-matched patients with and without NRT. Results: Patients receiving NRT had a reduced risk of several cardiovascular outcomes compared to those who did not receive NRT, including atrial fibrillation and flutter (RR [95% CI]=0.822[0.792-0.854, p<0.01]) and ventricular fibrillation and flutter (RR [95% CI]=0.715[0.654-0.781, p<0.01]). The risk of death was also reduced (RR [95% CI]=0.701[0.678-0.726, p<0.01]). Hospital readmissions were less frequent in the NRT group (RR [95% CI]= 0.960[0.955-0.965, p<0.01]). Additionally, the risk of cardiac arrest was lower (RR [95% CI]= 0.698[0.660-0.738, p<0.01]), and supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) was less common (RR [95% CI]= 0.883[0.827-0.942, p<0.01]). These results highlight the potential benefits of NRT in reducing the risk of various cardiac events following AMI or UA. Conclusions: The cautious initiation of NRT during hospitalization can benefit ACS patients where the benefits outweigh the risks. This study aims to provide clarity and contribute to evidence-based guidelines for ACS management.

Background: Heart transplantation (HTx) is a life-saving procedure for patients with end-stage heart disease. Sarcoid myocarditis (SM) is a rare condition characterized by granulomatous inflammation of the myocardium. The mainstay of therapy is immunosuppression but the incidence of cardiac sarcoidosis leading to advanced heart failure is increasing. HTx is a valid option in such cases however post-HTx outcomes in sarcoid population have been poorly investigated. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2016 to 2021 was conducted. Outcomes compared between sarcoid and non-sarcoid HTx groups were mortality, length of stay (LOS), hospital charges, transplant rejection and graft failure. Mann-Whitney U test was utilized to compare differences between non-parametric variables, while multivariable logistic regression was applied to adjust for confounders. Results: During our study period a total of 17,635 patients underwent HTx out of which 235 (0.013%) had HTx due to sarcoid myocarditis. Multivariable analysis revealed a comparable mortality between sarcoid and non-sarcoid HTx (Adjusted Mortality: aOR 1.35; CI 0.40-4.56; p=0.61). Median length of stay in sarcoid myocarditis group was 29[IQR19-55] vs 28[IQR16-50] p=0.57. Total hospitalization charges were also comparable 956,893[IQR 649,498-1,451,199] vs 800,898[IQR 533,047-1,349,074], p=0.18. There was no significant increase in transplant rejection (aOR 1.43; CI 0.64-3.20; p=0.37) or graft failure (aOR 1.92; CI 0.55- 6.70; p=0.30) in the sarcoid myocarditis group (Table 1, Table 2). Conclusion: Sarcoid myocarditis patients undergoing HTx showed comparable mortality, LOS, total hospital charges, transplant rejection, or graft failure rates to patients undergoing HTx for other causes.While these findings suggest that SM, while rare, does not adversely affect transplant outcomes, we strongly advocate for more studies to adjust for limitations.