Back to Authors

Nadeem, Zain Ali

0009-0008-5968-4538

Mayo Clinic

Allama Iqbal Medical College

Citations 2

Mortality Due to Aortic Dissection in Adults With Primary Hypertension: A Nationwide Analysis Over Two Decades
Ahmed, Shahzaib , Nadeem, Aimen , Ashraf, Hamza, Akram, Umar , Ahmad, Eeman, Ahmad, Shoaib , Hassan, Ibrahim Nagmeldin , Ullah, Irfan , Costa, Rui Bebiano Da Providencia E., Alraies, Chadi, Ashraf, Hamza , Akram, Umar , Ahmad, Eeman , Ahmad, Shoaib , Hassan, Ibrahim Nagmeldin , Ullah, Irfan , Ahmed, Raheel , Chahal, Anwar A, Alraies, M Chadi , Nadeem, Zain Ali , Ahmed, Raheel , Chahal, C. Anwar A.

Clinical Cardiology | February 6, 2026 | Volume: 49 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/clc.70269 Get It

ABSTRACT Objective Hypertension is a key risk factor for aortic dissection (AD). AD, if left untreated, carries significant mortality rates. Our aim is to analyse trends in mortality due to AD in adults with primary hypertension in the United States (US). Methods We used the CDC WONDER database to extract mortality data for patients with primary hypertension who died due to AD. Age‐adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) and crude mortality rates (CMRs) were extracted per 100 000 persons. Annual percentage changes (APCs) and average APCs (AAPCs) in AAMRs and CMRs were calculated using Joinpoint regression. Results From 1999 to 2020, a total of 13 128 deaths due to AD were reported in patients with primary hypertension in the US. Males displayed a higher overall AAMR (0.3) than females (0.2) throughout the study period. Slight regional variations were observed, with the West showing the highest overall AAMR (0.4), followed by the Midwest (0.3), and the Northeast and South (0.2). In urban areas, AAMRs were higher than in rural areas until 2008. From 2009 to 2020, AAMRs remained stable in urban areas (0.3) but increased in rural areas from 2010 to 2020 (4.7). The highest state‐level AAMRs were observed in Hawaii, Oregon, and Oklahoma. Conclusion Significant differences were observed in AAPCs compared to AD‐related mortality trends in the general population. Mortality trends revealed an initial decline followed by a gradual rise. Clinicians should focus on high‐risk groups and raise awareness about the disease in these populations.
The diagnostic challenge of differentiating tumefactive multiple sclerosis (TMS) from other brain lesions: a case report and literature review on a rare subtype of MS
Gill, Anosh, Eltawansy, Sherif , Karamat, Riyan Imtiaz , Esposito, Sarah , Karamat, Shayan Imtiaz, Aamir, Minahil , Akilimali, Aymar , Akilimali, Aymar , Nadeem, Zain Ali , Anwaar, Adeel

Annals of Medicine & Surgery | October 23, 2024 | Volume: 86 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 7418-7422

10.1097/ms9.0000000000002687 Get It

Introduction and importance: This case report is a clinical diagnosis walk through of a rare subtype of multiple sclerosis (MS). It gives an overview of how tumefactive multiple sclerosis (TMS) is systematically narrowed down as the definitive diagnosis. Case presentation: This 29-year-old male patient presented to the emergency department. He collapsed after experiencing pain over his right frontotemporal region followed by a seizure witnessed by his family. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the brain displayed diffuse enlargement and abnormal T2 weighted and FLAIR hyperintense signals in the diagnostic impressions described by the radiologist of the right temporoparietal region. Clinical discussion: Liquefactive multiple sclerosis, also known as tumefactive multiple sclerosis or Marburg-type multiple sclerosis, is a rare subtype of the neurological disorder that can be difficult to diagnose. Unlike the traditional form of MS, TMS can present as a brain tumor and must be diagnosed with a biopsy rather than via MRI and clinical findings alone. Patients can typically present with headache, cognitive abnormalities, mental confusion, aphasia, apraxia, seizures, and weakness. Here, the authors discuss the presentation, disease diagnosis process and patient management. Conclusion: The patient was stabilized and discharged with a referral to the neurosurgery and neurology departments for outpatient consultation for future clinical management and treatment of their condition.