O’Brien, Sarah H.

AbstractVenous thromboembolic (VTE) complications in children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) and T or B cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (T/B cell LL) can result not only in life-threatening acute complications but also contribute to significant long-term sequelae. The PREVAPIX-ALL study is an open-label randomized controlled study comparing outcomes of treatment with prophylactic dose apixaban versus no anticoagulation (standard of care) in children and adolescents with ALL and T/B cell LL receiving standard induction chemotherapy with asparaginase and the presence of a central venous access device. On day 29 of induction, all patients undergo screening imaging with duplex ultrasonography and echocardiography. The primary efficacy endpoint of the study is a composite of symptomatic and asymptomatic VTE that includes deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, cerebral sinovenous thrombosis or VTE-related death. The primary safety outcome is major bleeding. Secondary outcomes are central line-associated infections, patency and line replacement, superficial thrombosis, arterial events and death. A planned sample size of 500 randomized paediatric patients enrolled over a period of 5 years is based on the estimation of VTE rates of 20 and 10% in the standard of care and apixaban groups, respectively. An optional biomarker study in 150 patients will examine predictors of increased VTE risk and study in vivo anticoagulant effects of apixaban in children by measuring specific biomarkers in the haemostatic system and inflammatory pathway. This study will provide valuable information for the safety and efficacy of apixaban in VTE prevention during induction in paediatric ALL.

Abstract Choosing Wisely® is a medical stewardship and quality improvement initiative led by the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation in collaboration with leading medical societies in the United States. The ASH is an active participant in the Choosing Wisely® project. Using an iterative process and an evidence-based method, ASH has identified 5 tests and treatments that in some circumstances are not well supported by evidence and which in certain cases involve a risk of adverse events and financial costs with low likelihood of benefit. The ASH Choosing Wisely® recommendations focus on avoiding liberal RBC transfusion, avoiding thrombophilia testing in adults in the setting of transient major thrombosis risk factors, avoiding inferior vena cava filter usage except in specified circumstances, avoiding the use of plasma or prothrombin complex concentrate in the nonemergent reversal of vitamin K antagonists, and limiting routine computed tomography surveillance after curative-intent treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. We recommend that clinicians carefully consider anticipated benefits of the identified tests and treatments before performing them.

Abstract Choosing Wisely® is a medical stewardship and quality improvement initiative led by the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation in collaboration with leading medical societies in the United States. The ASH is an active participant in the Choosing Wisely® project. Using an iterative process and an evidence-based method, ASH has identified 5 tests and treatments that in some circumstances are not well supported by evidence and which in certain cases involve a risk of adverse events and financial costs with low likelihood of benefit. The ASH Choosing Wisely® recommendations focus on avoiding liberal RBC transfusion, avoiding thrombophilia testing in adults in the setting of transient major thrombosis risk factors, avoiding inferior vena cava filter usage except in specified circumstances, avoiding the use of plasma or prothrombin complex concentrate in the nonemergent reversal of vitamin K antagonists, and limiting routine computed tomography surveillance after curative-intent treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. We recommend that clinicians carefully consider anticipated benefits of the identified tests and treatments before performing them.