Tagawa, Scott T.

AbstractCurrent US clinical practice guidelines for advanced prostate cancer management contain recommendations based on high‐level evidence from randomized controlled trials; however, these guidelines do not address the nuanced clinical questions that are unanswered by prospective trials but nonetheless encountered in day‐to‐day practice. To address these practical questions, the 2024 US Prostate Cancer Conference (USPCC 2024) was created to generate US‐focused expert clinical decision‐making guidance for circumstances in which level 1 evidence is lacking. At the second annual USPCC meeting (USPCC 2024), a multidisciplinary panel of experts convened to discuss ongoing clinical challenges related to 5 topic areas: biochemical recurrence; metastatic, castration‐sensitive prostate cancer; poly [ADP‐ribose] polymerase inhibitors; prostate‐specific membrane antigen radioligand therapy; and metastatic, castration‐resistant prostate cancer. Through a modified Delphi process, 34 consensus recommendations were developed and are intended to provide clinicians who manage prostate cancer with guidance related to the implementation of novel treatments and technologies. In this report, the authors review the areas of consensus identified by the USPCC 2024 experts and evaluate ongoing unmet needs regarding translational application of the current clinical evidence.

AbstractBackground[177Lu]Lu–PSMA‐617 (177Lu‐PSMA‐617) plus protocol‐permitted standard of care (SOC) prolonged overall survival (OS) and radiographic progression‐free survival (rPFS) versus SOC in patients with prostate‐specific membrane antigen (PSMA)–positive metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the phase 3 VISION study, in addition to beneficial effects on symptomatic skeletal events (SSEs) and health‐related quality of life (HRQOL).MethodsPost hoc analyses used the full analysis set from the VISION study (N = 831) overall and by randomized treatment arm (177Lu‐PSMA‐617 plus SOC, n = 551; SOC, n = 280). Correlations were determined between OS and rPFS and between rPFS or OS and time to SSE or to worsening HRQOL (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Prostate [FACT‐P] and 5‐level EQ‐5D [EQ‐5D‐5L]). Correlation analyses used an iterative multiple imputation copula‐based approach (correlation coefficients [rho] of <0.3 were defined as weak, ≥0.3 and <0.5 as mild, ≥0.5 and <0.7 as moderate, and ≥0.7 as strong).ResultsIn the overall population, rPFS correlated strongly with OS (rho, ≥0.7). Correlations between rPFS or OS and time to SSE without death were weak or mild. Time to worsening in the FACT‐P total score and emotional and physical well‐being domains correlated mildly or moderately with rPFS and moderately with OS. Correlation coefficients for time‐to‐worsening EQ‐5D‐5L scores were mild to moderate for both rPFS and OS. Correlation coefficients were similar between treatment arms.ConclusionsIn this analysis of the VISION study, rPFS correlated strongly with OS but not with time to SSE or worsening HRQOL. These findings require further investigation.

TPS5116 Background: Prostate cancer (PC) is common and despite recent advances in treatment options, patients with metastatic disease still have poor outcomes, warranting the development of new effective therapies in this setting. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is expressed in benign and malignant prostate tissues and luminal surface of salivary/lacrimal glands, small intestine and renal tubules. The double PSMA binding moiety of SAR-bisPSMA in 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA (imaging) and 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA (therapy) may offer advantages compared to currently used single-target PSMA agents. Clinical evidence demonstrated 2-3 times higher uptake of 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA compared to the single-target PSMA agent, 68Ga-PSMA-11. Pre-clinical efficacy data of 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA in mice showed statistically significant tumor growth inhibition compared to the control group as well as a dose-dependent delay in eventual tumor regression in a PC xenograft study. These results led to the development of this clinical study, which aims to assess safety and anti-tumor efficacy of 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA in patients with metastatic castrate resistant PC (mCRPC). Methods: SECuRE is a phase I/IIa multi-center, open-label, non-randomized, dose-escalation and cohort expansion study of 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA and 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA (NCT04868604). mCRPC patients with progression, prior exposure to at least one androgen receptor pathway inhibitor, and positive 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA PET may be treated with 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA. This study is being conducted in 3 phases: a 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA Dosimetry Phase (n=6), a 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA Dose Escalation Phase (n=up to 24), and a 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA Cohort Expansion Phase (n=14). The primary and key secondary objectives include assessment of 64Cu- and 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA safety and dosimetry, determining the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or maximum feasible dose (MFD) and anti-tumor efficacy of 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA. The 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA dose levels investigated in the escalation phase include: 4 GBq (cohort 1, single dose), 8 GBq (cohort 2, single dose), 12 GBq (cohort 3, single dose) and up to 24 GBq across two doses (cohort 4, two doses at MTD or MFD). The Dose Expansion Phase of the study will allow the administration of up to 4 doses of 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA at the MTD/MFD. Response measurements include reduction in PSA levels, radiological progression-free survival, duration of response and overall survival. Radiological response will be assessed by RECIST V1.1 and PCWG3. At the time of submission of this abstract, no dose limiting toxicities have been observed to date in the first 3 cohorts. In the United States, 4 sites are active with additional sites in planning. Additional sites in the US and Australia are currently in start-up. Clinical trial information: NCT04868604 .

TPS5115 Background: The treatment of advanced prostate cancer (PC) is challenging, with no curative therapy to date and undesirable side effects that may impact patient quality of life. Monoclonal antibodies enable high specificity with low rates of off-target organ exposure, prolonged retention in PSMA+ tumors, and a predictable safety profile. There is a strong rationale for further investigation of the 177Lu-labeled, chelator-conjugated antibody, 177Lu-DOTA-rosopatamab (hereafter, TLX591), with prior studies demonstrating a favorable safety profile and efficacy, particularly with a fractionated (dose-dense) regimen Phase 1 ProstACT SELECT preliminary results demonstrate consistent uptake between TLX591 and 68Ga-PSMA-11 imaging and reinforces advantages of this first-in-class radio-antibody drug conjugate investigational therapy. Methods: In this multinational, multicenter, prospective, randomized, open label phase 3 study, patients (N=400) with PSMA-expressing metastatic castration-resistant PC (mCRPC) that have progressed despite prior treatment with an androgen-receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) will be enrolled in a 2:1 ratio to receive best protocol-defined standard of care (SoC) with or without 2 intravenous injections of 2.8 GBq of TLX591, given 14 days apart. SoC may be alternative ARPI or docetaxel. Eligible patients must have received 1 prior ARPI in the mCSPC, nmCRPC, or 1L mCRPC setting. Patients must have 150x109 /L platelets, and have PSMA-positive disease on 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging. The primary endpoint is radiographic progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints include 5-year overall survival, tumor objective response rate, time to symptomatic skeletal event, health-related quality of life, and treatment-related adverse events count. An alpha control and 95% confidence intervals will be used; patients will be substratified between TLX591 + 2nd ARPI or TLX591 + docetaxel. This study is currently enrolling. This study is funded by Telix Pharmaceuticals. Clinical trial information: NCT04876651 .

5074 Background: PC commonly expresses PSMA and has dose-responsive radiosensitivity. 177Lu-based radioligands usually use an empiric dosing regimen. This 1st dose-escalation study of 177Lu-PSMA-617 employed a dose-dense fractionation schedule intended to allow delivery of higher total doses to overcome radioresistance due to repopulation. Here, we report mature results of the study. Methods: Progressive mCRPC following > 1 potent ARPI (e.g., abi/enza) and chemo (or unfit/refuse taxane) without limit of # prior therapies provided adequate organ function and ECOG PS 0-2. Treatment: single cycle of fractionated dose 177Lu-PSMA-617 on D1 and D15. In Ph I dose-escalation, patients (pts) received one cycle of 7.4 - 22 GBq followed by Simon 2-stage Ph II at 22.2 GBq. PSMA expression was not required for treatment, but pre- and post-treatment 68Ga-PSMA11 PET/CT and/or 177Lu-PSMA-617 SPECT done. Primary efficacy by PSA changes with 2ndary outcomes with CT/bone scans, PSMA PET, circulating tumor cell (CTC; CellSearch) counts, plasma DNA (PCF_SELECT), and survival. Results: Between 1/2017 – 2/2021, 50 pts treated with median PSA 164.3, 35 (70%) CALGB (Halabi) poor risk. 47 (94%) bone, 38 (76%) nodal, 12 (24%) lung, 5 (10%) liver mets (4 additional pts with PSMA PET+ liver mets not apparent on CT). 29 (58%) with prior >2 ARPI, 29 (58%) with >1 chemo, 14 (28%) with Ra-223, 2 (4%) with 177Lu-J591. 27 (54%) treated at 22 GBq. No dose-limiting toxicity during Ph I. 38 (76%) with any PSA decline, 27 (54%) with >50% PSA. Median rPFS 8.3 mo [5.6-16.7], and OS 15.7 mo [10.9-20.6]. Of 17 RECIST measurable, 6 (35.3%) responded, 7 (41.2%) stable, 4 (23.5%) progressed. Of 31 with paired CTC counts, 16 (52%) decreased, 5 (16%) were stable; 10 (32.3%) converted to favorable/undetectable. Plasma DNA with high allele-specific ploidy and ARcopy number gain associated with OS (univariate). Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE): 32 (64%) dry mouth, 22 (44%) pain flare, 22 (44%) fatigue, 19 (38%) nausea, 15 (30%) anemia, 15 (28%) thrombocytopenia (plts), 9 (18%) neutropenia (ANC). All TEAEs restricted to grade (Gr) 1-2 except 6 (12%) with Gr 3 anemia, 2 (4%) Gr 3/4 plts, 1 (2%) Gr 3 ANC. TEAE incidence and Gr were not related to dose. On multivariable analysis, 177Lu dose administered (p=0.09), CALGB risk (p=0.04), prior chemo (p=0.009), associated with OS; dose (p=0.1), CALGB risk (p=0.2), and AR copy number (p=0.2) associated with PSA50 decline. Baseline PSMA imaging (by imaging score or SUVmax) was not associated with OS or response. Conclusions: A single-cycle of fractionated-dose 177Lu-PSMA-617 is safe. Despite no pre-selection for PSMA expression, most had PSA decline with favorable PFS and OS compared to historical controls and similar to PSMA-selected targeted radionuclide studies administering multiple cycles in a less dose-intense approach. Clinical trial information: NCT03042468 .

LBA12004 Background: Hot flashes are among the most common adverse events impacting quality of life reported by patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for the treatment of prostate cancer. Oxybutynin is an effective therapy for reducing frequency and severity of hot flashes in women. Pilot information supports that this drug may also benefit men with hot flashes related to ADT. Methods: Patients with prostate cancer receiving a stable regimen of ADT with at least 28 hot flashes per week were randomized to receive either oral oxybutynin 2.5 mg twice a day, oxybutynin 5 mg twice a day, or matching placebo doses for 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in patient-reported hot flash scores (determined by multiplying the number of hot flashes by the mean hot flash severity [grade 0: none, 1: mild, 2: moderate, 3: severe, and 4: very severe]) from baseline to 6 weeks, as measured by a daily hot flash diary. A total of 87 patients provided 76% power to reject the null hypothesis of no between-arm mean difference in hot flash score reduction from baseline to 6 weeks, when comparing each oxybutynin arm to the combined placebo arms. This was based on a two-sided contrast estimated from a generalized linear mixed model, α= 0.10, intraclass correlation of 0.50, population standardized mean difference of 0.50, and 10% missing data rate. Results: 88 patients were accrued between 10/28/21 and 12/02/23. Six patients cancelled before starting treatment and one was ineligible, leaving 81 analyzed patients with a median age of 68. Baseline characteristics were balanced between arms with patients reporting an average of 10.15 (SD = 5.55) hot flashes per day and an average daily hot flash score of 18.23 (SD = 13.48) at enrollment. On average, patients on the placebo arm, low dose oxybutynin arm, and high dose oxybutynin arm had reductions of 2.15, 4.77, and 6.89 hot flashes/day, respectively. Compared to placebo arm patients, high dose oxybutynin arm patients had a greater reduction in hot flashes/day (p < 0.001), as did low dose oxybutynin arm patients (p = 0.02). Daily hot flash scores for the same three protocol arms reduced by an average of 4.85, 9.94, and 13.95 points, respectively. Compared to placebo arm patients, high dose oxybutynin arm patients had a greater reduction in daily hot flash scores (p = 0.002), as did low dose oxybutynin arm patients (p = 0.07). No treatment-related grade 3+ adverse events occurred. The most commonly reported oxybutynin-related grade 2 adverse event was dry mouth. Conclusions: Oxybutynin is superior to a placebo for the management of hot flashes in men associated with androgen deprivation therapy and appears to be well tolerated. Support: UG1CA189823; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org . Clinical trial information: NCT04600336 .

Background: Management strategies for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have rapidly shifted in recent years. As novel imaging and therapeutic approaches have made their way to the clinic, providers are encountering increasingly challenging clinical scenarios, with limited guidance from the current literature. Materials and Methods: The US Prostate Cancer Conference (USPCC) is a multidisciplinary meeting of prostate cancer experts intended to address the many challenges of prostate cancer management. At the first annual USPCC meeting, areas of controversy and consensus were identified during a 2-day meeting that included expert presentations, full-panel discussions, and postdiscussion responses to questions developed by the USPCC cochairs and session moderators. Results: This narrative review covers the USPCC expert discussion and perspectives relevant to mCRPC, including neuroendocrine/aggressive-variant prostate cancer (NEPC/AVPC). Areas of broad agreement identified among USPCC experts include the benefits of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors for patients with BRCA1/2 mutations, the use of radioligand therapy in patients with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)–positive mCRPC, and the need for clinical trials that address real-world clinical questions, including the performance of novel therapies when compared with modern standard-of-care treatment. Ongoing areas of controversy and uncertainty included the appropriateness of PARP inhibitors in patients with non-BRCA1/2 mutations, the optimal definition of PSMA positivity, and systemic therapies for patients with NEPC/AVPC after progression on platinum-based therapies. Conclusions: The first annual USPCC meeting identified several areas of controversy in the management of mCRPC, highlighting the urgent need for clinical trials designed to facilitate treatment selection and sequencing in this heterogeneous disease state.

Purpose: Castration-sensitive prostate cancer (CSPC) is a complex and heterogeneous condition encompassing a range of clinical presentations. As new approaches have expanded management options, clinicians are left with myriad questions and controversies regarding the optimal individualized management of CSPC. Materials and Methods: The US Prostate Cancer Conference (USPCC) multidisciplinary panel was assembled to address the challenges of prostate cancer management. The first annual USPCC meeting included experts in urology, medical oncology, radiation oncology, and nuclear medicine. USPCC co-chairs and session moderators identified key areas of controversy and uncertainty in prostate cancer management and organized the sessions with multidisciplinary presentations and discussion. Throughout the meeting, experts responded to questions prepared by chairs and moderators to identify areas of agreement and controversy. Results: The USPCC panel discussion and question responses for CSPC-related topics are presented. Key advances in CSPC management endorsed by USPCC experts included the development and clinical utilization of gene expression classifiers and artificial intelligence (AI) models for risk stratification and treatment selection in specific patient populations, the use of advanced imaging modalities in patients with clinically localized unfavorable intermediate or high-risk disease and those with biochemical recurrence, recommendations of doublet or triplet therapy for metastatic CSPC (mCSPC), and consideration of prostate and/or metastasis-directed radiation therapy in select patients with mCSPC. Conclusions: CSPC is a diverse disease with many therapeutic options and the potential for adverse outcomes associated with either undertreatment or overtreatment. Future studies are needed to validate and clinically integrate novel technologies, including genomics, AI, and advanced imaging, to optimize outcomes among patients with CSPC.

Abstract Background: We have previously reported that 177Lu-PSMA-617 given as a single-cycle, dose-intense regimen for patients (pts) with pretreated mCRPC is efficacious even without selection by PSMA (ESMO 2021). Quantitative analyses of pre-treatment PSMA PET may allow for better patient selection and prediction of toxicities. Analyses of sequential PET images may also provide insights that may be associated with longer term outcomes. Our previous analysis of 13 patients demonstrated association of PSMA PET signal with overall survival (OS) and PSA responses, as well as trends with adverse events (Nauseef GU ASCO 2022). Here we present long-term follow up data and expanded imaging correlatives from our completed phase I/II study. MethodsEntry criteria: progressive mCRPC after at least one prior potent AR pathway inhibitor and prior chemotherapy (excepting men ineligible for or refusing of chemotherapy) with allowance for prior radionuclides (incl. Ra223 and PSMA-TRTs). Treatment was fractionated-dose (D1 and D15) 177Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4-22.2 GBq). TRAQinform IQ (AIQ Solutions) was used to identify, track, and quantify regions of interest suspicious of cancer (lesion-ROI) on PSMA PET/CT images and quantify uptake in normal organs outside of lesion-ROI. Measurements included SUVmean across all lesion-ROI, volume of lesion-ROI, and SUVtotal (sum of SUV in all lesion-ROI), as well as changes after treatment, including in PSMA-expressing healthy tissues. Associations with survival were tested via Cox proportional hazard models in univariate analyses and associations with adverse events (AEs) and PSA responses were via assessed via Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Results32 pts (of 50 total in the study between 1/2017-2/2021) had pre- and post-treatment imaging suitable TRAQinform IQ analysis and associated survival analyses. Baseline characteristics were similar to the entire study cohort. PSA response of 50% was observed in 21/32 (66%) of which 16 were confirmed. No imaging variable predicted PSA30 or PSA50, although an association was observed in pretreatment SUVmean and lesion-ROI volume reduction. No imaging variable was significantly associated with OS (e.g., pretx SUVmean HR 0.9, p=0.10, pretx Volume HR 1.00, p=0.052). Pretx SUVmean was associated with mPFS (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.74, 0.98, p=0.023). Among select AEs, anemia was associated with non-lesion-ROI skeleton SUVtotal in pre- (p=0.027) and post-tx (p=0.007). Higher pre-treatment salivary gland uptake (SUVmean) was associated with more xerostomia (p=0.11). Fatigue was associated with a variety of variables including salivary SUVs (mean, max, and total) and post-tx bowel SUVmax (p=0.030). ConclusionsPre-treatment and pre- to post-treatment 68Ga-PSMA11-PET data analyzed may be associated with outcome. While a strength of this study is the prospective nature of patient enrollment and fixed imaging timepoints, our associations are limited by small sample size. Expansion of this analysis to larger datasets may improve our ability to predict treatment response and toxicity by body-wide PSMA detection. Citation Format: Jones Trevor Nauseef, Charlene Thomas, Michael Sun, Nicole Jacobs, Andrés Ricaurte Fajardo, Sam Ruder, Escarleth Fernandez, Zachary Davidson, Amie Patel, A. Oliver Sartor, Shankar Vallabhajosula, Ana Molina, Cora N. Sternberg, David M. Nanus, Sandra Huicochea Castellanos, Joseph Osborne, Neil H. Bander, Timothy Perk, Scott Tagawa. Quantitative assessment of PSMA imaging before and after 177Lu-PSMA-617 treatment in a Ph I/II trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT225.

TPS246 Background: Prostate cancer (PC) is common and despite recent advances in treatment options, patients with metastatic disease still have poor outcomes, warranting the development of new effective therapies in this setting. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is expressed in benign and malignant prostate tissues and luminal surface of salivary/lacrimal glands, small intestine and renal tubules. The double PSMA binding moiety of SAR-bisPSMA in 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA (imaging) and 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA (therapy) may offer advantages compared to currently used single-target PSMA agents. Clinical evidence demonstrated 2-3 times higher uptake of 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA compared to the single-target PSMA agent, 68Ga-PSMA-11. Pre-clinical efficacy data of 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA in mice showed statistically significant tumor growth inhibition compared to the control group as well as a dose-dependent delay in eventual tumor regression in a PC xenograft study. These results led to the development of this clinical study, which aims to assess safety and anti-tumor efficacy of 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA in patients with metastatic castrate resistant PC (mCRPC). Methods: SECuRE is a phase I/IIa multi-center, open-label, non-randomized, dose-escalation and cohort expansion study of 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA and 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA. mCRPC patients with progression, prior exposure to at least one androgen receptor pathway inhibitor, and positive 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA PET may be treated with 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA. This study is being conducted in 3 phases: a 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA Dosimetry Phase (n=6), a 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA Dose Escalation Phase (n=up to 24), and a 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA Cohort Expansion Phase (n=14). The primary and key secondary objectives include assessment of 64Cu- and 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA safety and dosimetry, determining the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or maximum feasible dose (MFD) and anti-tumor efficacy of 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA. The 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA dose levels investigated in the escalation phase include: 4 GBq (cohort 1, single dose), 8 GBq (cohort 2, single dose), 12 GBq (cohort 3, single dose) and up to 24 GBq across two doses (cohort 4, two doses at MTD or MFD). The Dose Expansion Phase of the study will allow the administration of up to 4 doses of 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA at the MTD/MFD. Response measurements include reduction in PSA levels, radiological progression-free survival, duration of response and overall survival. Radiological response will be assessed by RECIST 1 V1.1 and PCWG3. At the time of submission of this abstract, cohort 3 is open for recruitment and no dose limiting toxicities have been observed to date. Clinical trial information: NCT04868604 .