Boike, Thomas

Background: Management strategies for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have rapidly shifted in recent years. As novel imaging and therapeutic approaches have made their way to the clinic, providers are encountering increasingly challenging clinical scenarios, with limited guidance from the current literature. Materials and Methods: The US Prostate Cancer Conference (USPCC) is a multidisciplinary meeting of prostate cancer experts intended to address the many challenges of prostate cancer management. At the first annual USPCC meeting, areas of controversy and consensus were identified during a 2-day meeting that included expert presentations, full-panel discussions, and postdiscussion responses to questions developed by the USPCC cochairs and session moderators. Results: This narrative review covers the USPCC expert discussion and perspectives relevant to mCRPC, including neuroendocrine/aggressive-variant prostate cancer (NEPC/AVPC). Areas of broad agreement identified among USPCC experts include the benefits of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors for patients with BRCA1/2 mutations, the use of radioligand therapy in patients with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)–positive mCRPC, and the need for clinical trials that address real-world clinical questions, including the performance of novel therapies when compared with modern standard-of-care treatment. Ongoing areas of controversy and uncertainty included the appropriateness of PARP inhibitors in patients with non-BRCA1/2 mutations, the optimal definition of PSMA positivity, and systemic therapies for patients with NEPC/AVPC after progression on platinum-based therapies. Conclusions: The first annual USPCC meeting identified several areas of controversy in the management of mCRPC, highlighting the urgent need for clinical trials designed to facilitate treatment selection and sequencing in this heterogeneous disease state.

Purpose: Castration-sensitive prostate cancer (CSPC) is a complex and heterogeneous condition encompassing a range of clinical presentations. As new approaches have expanded management options, clinicians are left with myriad questions and controversies regarding the optimal individualized management of CSPC. Materials and Methods: The US Prostate Cancer Conference (USPCC) multidisciplinary panel was assembled to address the challenges of prostate cancer management. The first annual USPCC meeting included experts in urology, medical oncology, radiation oncology, and nuclear medicine. USPCC co-chairs and session moderators identified key areas of controversy and uncertainty in prostate cancer management and organized the sessions with multidisciplinary presentations and discussion. Throughout the meeting, experts responded to questions prepared by chairs and moderators to identify areas of agreement and controversy. Results: The USPCC panel discussion and question responses for CSPC-related topics are presented. Key advances in CSPC management endorsed by USPCC experts included the development and clinical utilization of gene expression classifiers and artificial intelligence (AI) models for risk stratification and treatment selection in specific patient populations, the use of advanced imaging modalities in patients with clinically localized unfavorable intermediate or high-risk disease and those with biochemical recurrence, recommendations of doublet or triplet therapy for metastatic CSPC (mCSPC), and consideration of prostate and/or metastasis-directed radiation therapy in select patients with mCSPC. Conclusions: CSPC is a diverse disease with many therapeutic options and the potential for adverse outcomes associated with either undertreatment or overtreatment. Future studies are needed to validate and clinically integrate novel technologies, including genomics, AI, and advanced imaging, to optimize outcomes among patients with CSPC.

Abstract BACKGROUND The assessment of BM response to WBRT and its impact on NCF in clinical trials has been limited by lack of standardized imaging protocols. NRG-CC001 is a randomized clinical trial requiring pre-specified MRI protocols at baseline and 6-months, providing a uniform dataset to investigate if RR correlates with NCF changes. METHODS NRG-CC001 randomized patients with BM to hippocampal avoidance WBRT (HA-WBRT) or WBRT. NCF was analyzed using 6-month standardized change scores and deterioration, defined using the reliable change index. Chi-square and t-tests were used for pretreatment characteristic comparisons. Inter-rater reliability between central and institutional assessment of RR was assessed with weighted kappa, κ. Linear regression was used to test trends in NCF change scores across types of response and multivariable logistic regression was used to test the association of RR to NCF deterioration. RESULTS 149 and 135 patients were evaluable for RR and NCF assessment, respectively. Pretreatment characteristics were well-balanced, except for post-high school education (70.6% HA-WBRT vs. 52.5% WBRT, p=0.023). Inter-rater reliability between central and institutional assessment of RR was fair (κ=0.36). There was no difference between arms in RR (p=0.41) with overall rates of 14.1% CR, 42.2% PR, 17% SD, and 26.7% PD. Patients with CR had improved 6-month NCF change as measured by HVLT-R Total Recall (p=0.0005), HVLT-R Delayed Recall (p=0.0003), HVLT-R Delayed Recognition (p=0.011), TMT-B (p=0.033), COWA (p=0.016), and Clinical Trial Battery Composite score (p=0.0011). Multivariable analysis demonstrated less deterioration in HVLT-R Delayed Recall for CR (p=0.019) and PR (p=0.0086) vs. SD/PD and HVLT-R Recognition for PR (p=0.031) vs. SD/PD. CONCLUSIONS HA-WBRT and WBRT result in similar RR at 6-months. CR or PR is associated with better NCF preservation. This suggests investigation into treatment escalation for patients with SD/PD may provide further NCF benefit along with HA-WBRT and memantine.Grant support from NCI-UG1CA189867 and U24CA180803.