Kadrivel, Ram

Introduction Efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is still debatable. However, IVT's efficacy on stent retriever (SR) and aspiration thrombectomy (ASP) outcomes specifically remain unclear. In our meta‐analysis, we aimed to explore the effects of IVT on SR and ASP thrombectomy outcomes. Methods A systematic literature review was steered using Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Center of Clinical Trials databases, according to PRISMA guidelines. Outcomes of interest included successful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) ≥2b), functional independence (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤2), modified first pass efficacy (mFPE), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and embolization to new territories (ENT). Results We included four randomized controlled trials with 1176 patients. SR and ASP had similar mTICI ≥2b, mFPE, and mRS 0‐2 rates whether they received IVT or not. SR without IVT was associated with a lower rate of mFPE compared with the SR+IVT (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.97). Additionally, ASP without IVT resulted in a lower rate of mRS 0‐2 than the ASP+IVT (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.01). Finally, bridging therapy did not increase sICH and ENT rates after ASP or SR thrombectomy. Conclusion Our analysis suggests that SR and ASP thrombectomy have equivalent efficacy and safety outcomes regardless of prior IVT administration. Moreover, our results indicate that administration of IVT before MT may improve certain outcomes based on the used first‐line MT technique.