Chaudhry, Rajeev

Objective: To evaluate the documentation of menopause-related International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10) codes in the electronic health record (EHR) among midlife women with moderate or greater menopause symptoms receiving primary care. Methods: This cross-sectional study from the Hormones and Experiences of Aging (HERA) cohort included women aged 45-60 years receiving primary care at one of 4 Mayo Clinic sites who completed a one-time survey between March 1, 2021 and June 30, 2021. The survey captured demographic data, menopause symptoms using the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS), health care utilization, and treatment. Women with an MRS score ≥12 were included. The primary outcome was documentation of a menopause-related ICD-10 code in the EHR in the 12 months before survey completion. Results: Of 5,254 women with completed surveys, 2,414 (49%) had an MRS score ≥12 and were included. Among these, 1,519 (63%) reported seeking care for their menopause symptoms in the past 12 months, but only 345 (23%) had a menopause-related ICD-10 code. Women with an ICD-10 code had higher MRS scores (18 [IQR: 14-22] vs 17 [IQR: 14-20]; P = 0.002) and were more likely to use systemic hormone therapy (HT; 26% vs 9%; P < 0.001), and vaginal HT (20% vs 6%; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Menopause-related ICD-10 diagnosis codes were under-documented in women with significant menopause symptom burden. Those with a code were more likely to report menopause treatment. These findings highlight a critical gap between symptom burden and diagnosis coding in the EHR, underscoring the need to improve identification and management of menopause symptoms.

Abstract Background Older adults with severe aortic stenosis (AS) are at high risk of mortality unless surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (AVR) is performed. Risk stratification often becomes complicated in frail elders with multi-morbidity, and time constraints limit thorough evaluation of geriatric comorbidities in the outpatient clinic setting. Purpose Utilization of an automated administratively-derived electronic health record (EHR) tool may aid in risk stratification of AS patients undergoing AVR. Methods We reviewed patients with severe AS undergoing AVR at our hospital program and cross-referenced with the Elder Risk Assessment (ERA) score. The ERA score is an administratively abstracted score derived on adults &gt;60 years old followed by general medicine clinic. It contains the following variables: marital status, age, hospitalized days in preceding 2 years, diabetes, coronary disease, heart failure, stroke, pulmonary disease, cancer, and dementia; higher scores indicate greater risk for adverse outcomes. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival by ERA score tertile. Cox regression was used to test the association of ERA with survival. Results There were 97 patients with severe AS undergoing AVR with ERA scores. Mean age was 80.6 (±6.6) years, 37% were female, average Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) score was 3.6% (± 2.6), and 7% had transcatheter AVR. Co-morbidities were prevalent and included atrial fibrillation (41%), chronic renal failure (16%), stroke (14%), and diabetes (35%). Over a mean follow-up of 68 months (± 37.9 months), there were 62 deaths. Elevated ERA score was associated with worse long term survival (p=0.016 by log-rank) (Figure 1), with only 49% surviving at 5 years in the highest ERA tertile vs 68% in the lowest ERA tertile. Cox regression demonstrated that the relative risk of death per 6 unit increase in ERA score was 1.54 (95% CI 1.21–1.96, P&lt;0.001) in single variable analysis and 1.43 (95% CI 1.11–1.84, P=0.006) after adjusting for STS score. Conclusions Patients undergoing AVR for severe AS are often co-morbid older adults. An automated EHR derived ERA score was independently associated with survival after accounting for STS score and may streamline and improve risk assessment in these patients. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Foundation. Main funding source(s): Mayo Clinic

AbstractBackgroundChildhood obesity is underdiagnosed in primary care practices. Our study aimed to compare rates of documentation of diagnosis of obesity and counselling for nutrition and physical activity at an academic primary care practice prior to and following implementation of a body mass index (BMI)‐based electronic point of care clinical reminder tool.MethodsWe performed a retrospective record review of children aged 2–18 years undergoing well child visits during any of three calendar years (2009, 2011 and 2013). The electronic clinical reminder tool was implemented in September 2010. Records of children with BMI > 95th percentile were electronically searched for terms of documentation of diagnosis of obesity and nutrition and physical activity counselling. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to adjust for potential patient and provider confounders.ResultsAmong those with BMI ≥ 95th percentile, there was a statistically significant increase in documentation of diagnosis of obesity (45.5% in 2009 vs. 52.4% in 2011; P < 0.001; adjusted odds ratio 1.36; 95% CI 1.13–1.65) and in counselling for physical activity and nutrition (66.8% in 2009 vs. 75.2% in 2011; P < 0.001; adjusted odds ratio 1.33; 95% CI 1.06–1.66) following implementation of the tool. Compared with 2011, there was no statistically significant increase in documentation of obesity (50.4%) or nutrition and physical activity counselling (77.9%) in 2013.ConclusionsThe implementation of a point of care clinical reminder tool was associated with improvement in documentation of diagnosis of obesity and counselling for nutrition and physical activity. Further studies are needed to determine the impact of these automated tools on weight outcomes in children.

AbstractAims and objectivesThe aim of this study was to assess the impact of historical screening compliance with the effectiveness of patient reminder letters on cervical cancer screening rates.MethodUsing population‐based informatics systems, women with no cervical cancer screening in the prior 3 years were identified in two primary care clinics, Mayo Family Clinic Northeast (NE; n = 1613) and Northwest (NW; n = 1088). Patients were divided into two compliance groups: overdue/unknown screening status at study start or previously compliant. The NE Clinic sent reminder letters over a 6 months window to patients eligible for screening at the study start or during the study that were also identified as employees/dependents (E/D). There were 795 intervention (NE Clinic E/D patients) and 1906 control subjects. Using an intent‐to‐treat analysis, differences in screening rates were assessed.ResultsA higher unadjusted screening rate was observed for the E/D group than the non‐E/D group at both sites (32.7 versus 18.2% at NW, P < 0.001; 39.0 versus 14.7% at NE, P < 0.001). For the historically compliant group, unadjusted screening rates were higher for those who received letters (E/D subjects at NE) versus those who did not (E/D subjects at NW; 56.1 versus 44.5%, P = 0.01). No difference was observed between E/D subjects at NE (received letters) and NW (no letters) for the overdue/unknown group (27.4 versus 25.9%, P = 0.62). There was no difference in screening rates for non‐E/D subjects at NE versus at NW (none of whom received letters) for both the compliant (24.2 versus 30.6%, P = 0.18) and the overdue/unknown groups (11.9 versus 13.0%, P = 0.59). Multivariate logistic regression models showed a significant overall effect of E/D status (P = 0.006), compliance group (P < 0.001), and the interaction between clinic site and E/D status (P = 0.04).ConclusionAmong insured women, reminder letters appear to improve cervical cancer screening rates for those with a history of screening compliance. Reminder letters appear insufficient to motivate women if screening is overdue. Further investigation of the cohort of women overdue for screening is needed to develop interventions to successfully target this group.