Montecino, Martı́n

Transcriptional control of Runx2 gene expression through two alternative promoters (P1 and P2) is critical for the execution of its function as an osteogenic cell fate determining factor. Using genomic DNaseI footprinting and in vivo DNA binding assays, we identified a helix‐loop‐helix (HLH) motif that overlaps with a Runx motif in the P1 promoter. The HLH mutation decreases P1 transcription 10‐fold in mesenchymal cells, while mutation of the Runx site enhances transcription 2 fold. Although the HLH element is not cell‐type specific, its function may depend on promoter context. Promoter deletion analysis shows that a GA‐rich region (−200 to −128) positively regulates Runx2 P1 transcription and synergizes with the HLH motif. Examination of the −200/−128 region reveals two tandemly repeated GA‐rich elements (GAY motifs) that each contain recognition motifs for purine‐rich DNA binding factors (i.e., SP1 and KLF10/TGFâ Inducible Factor [TIEG]). Forced expression of SP1 or TIEG modulates Runx2 P1 promoter activity through the GAY motifs. Taken together, our data suggest that the Runx2 gene transcription is regulated by synergistic interactions at multiple conserved composite promoter elements to control Runx2 expression and skeletal development.

Abstract Expression of Runx2/p57 is a hallmark of the osteoblast‐lineage identity. Although several regulators that control the expression of Runx2/p57 during osteoblast‐lineage commitment have been identified, the epigenetic mechanisms that sustain this expression in differentiated osteoblasts remain to be completely determined. Here, we assess epigenetic mechanisms associated with Runx2/p57 gene transcription in differentiating MC3T3 mouse osteoblasts. Our results show that an enrichment of activating histone marks at the Runx2/p57 P1 promoter is accompanied by the simultaneous interaction of Wdr5 and Utx proteins, both are components of COMPASS complexes. Knockdown of Wdr5 and Utx expression confirms the activating role of both proteins at the Runx2‐P1 promoter. Other chromatin modifiers that were previously described to regulate Runx2/p57 transcription in mesenchymal precursor cells (Ezh2, Prmt5, and Jarid1b proteins) were not found to contribute to Runx2/p57 transcription in full‐committed osteoblasts. We also determined the presence of additional components of COMPASS complexes at the Runx2/p57 promoter, evidencing that the Mll2/COMPASS‐ and Mll3/COMPASS‐like complexes bind to the P1 promoter in osteoblastic cells expressing Runx2/p57 to modulate the H3K4me1 to H3K4me3 transition.

AbstractOsteoblast differentiation is controlled by transcription factor RUNX2 which temporally activates or represses several bone‐related genes, including those encoding extracellular matrix proteins or factors that control cell‐cell, and cell‐matrix interactions. Cell‐cell communication in the many skeletal pericellular micro‐niches is critical for bone development and involves paracrine secretion of growth factors and morphogens. This paracrine signaling is in part regulated by “A Disintegrin And Metalloproteinase” (ADAM) proteins. These cell membrane‐associated metalloproteinases support proteolytic release (“shedding”) of protein ectodomains residing at the cell surface. We analyzed microarray and RNA‐sequencing data for Adam genes and show that Adam17, Adam10, and Adam9 are stimulated during BMP2 mediated induction of osteogenic differentiation and are robustly expressed in human osteoblastic cells. ADAM17, which was initially identified as a tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) converting enzyme also called (TACE), regulates TNFα‐signaling pathway, which inhibits osteoblast differentiation. We demonstrate that Adam17 expression is suppressed by RUNX2 during osteoblast differentiation through the proximal Adam17 promoter region (−0.4 kb) containing two functional RUNX2 binding motifs. Adam17 downregulation during osteoblast differentiation is paralleled by increased RUNX2 expression, cytoplasmic‐nuclear translocation and enhanced binding to the Adam17 proximal promoter. Forced expression of Adam17 reduces Runx2 and Alpl expression, indicating that Adam17 may negatively modulate osteoblast differentiation. These findings suggest a novel regulatory mechanism involving a reciprocal Runx2‐Adam17 negative feedback loop to regulate progression through osteoblast differentiation. Our results suggest that RUNX2 may control paracrine signaling through regulation of ectodomain shedding at the cell surface of osteoblasts by directly suppressing Adam17 expression.

Epigenetic mechanisms mediate the acquisition of specialized cellular phenotypes during tissue development, maintenance and repair. When phenotype‐committed cells transit through mitosis, chromosomal condensation counteracts epigenetic activation of gene expression. Subsequent post‐mitotic re‐activation of transcription depends on epigenetic DNA and histone modifications, as well as other architecturally bound proteins that “bookmark” the genome. Osteogenic lineage commitment, differentiation and progenitor proliferation require the bone‐related runt‐related transcription factor Runx2. Here, we characterized a non‐genomic mRNA mediated mechanism by which osteoblast precursors retain their phenotype during self‐renewal. We show that osteoblasts produce maximal levels of Runx2 mRNA, but not protein, prior to mitotic cell division. Runx2 mRNA partitions symmetrically between daughter cells in a non‐chromosomal tubulin‐containing compartment. Subsequently, transcription‐independent de novo synthesis of Runx2 protein in early G1 phase results in increased functional interactions of Runx2 with a representative osteoblast‐specific target gene (osteocalcin/BGLAP2) in chromatin. Somatic transmission of Runx2 mRNAs in osteoblasts and osteosarcoma cells represents a versatile mechanism for translational rather than transcriptional induction of this principal gene regulator to maintain osteoblast phenotype identity after mitosis. J. Cell. Physiol. 231: 1001–1014, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Human adipose‐derived mesenchymal stromal cells (AMSCs) grown in platelet lysate are promising agents for therapeutic tissue regeneration. Here, we investigated whether manipulation of epigenetic events by the clinically relevant histone deacetylase inhibitor suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) alters differentiation of AMSCs. The multipotency of AMSCs was validated by their ability to differentiate into osteogenic, chondrogenic, and adipogenic lineages. High‐throughput RNA sequencing and RT‐qPCR established that human histone deacetylases (HDAC1 to HDAC11, and SIRT1 to SIRT7) are differentially expressed in AMSCs. SAHA induces hyper‐acetylation of histone H3 and H4, stimulates protein expression of the HDAC‐responsive gene SLC9A3R1/NHERF1 and modulates the AKT/FOXO1 pathway. Biologically, SAHA interferes with osteogenic, chondrogenic and adipogenic lineage commitment of multipotent AMSCs. Mechanistically, SAHA‐induced loss of differentiation potential of uncommitted AMSCs correlates with multiple changes in the expression of principal transcription factors that control mesenchymal or pluripotent states. We propose that SAHA destabilizes the multi‐potent epigenetic state of uncommitted human AMSCs by hyper‐acetylation and perturbation of key transcription factor pathways. Furthermore, AMSCs grown in platelet lysate may provide a useful biological model for screening of new HDAC inhibitors that control the biological fate of human mesenchymal stromal cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 230: 52–62, 2015. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

ABSTRACTThe chromatin remodeling complex SWI/SNF and the transcription factor C/EBPβ play critical roles in osteoblastic cells as they jointly control transcription of a number of bone‐related target genes. The largest C/EBPβ isoform, LAP*, possesses a short additional N‐terminal domain that has been proposed to mediate the interaction of this factor with SWI/SNF in myeloid cells. Here we examine the requirement of a functional N‐terminus in C/EBPβ‐LAP* for binding SWI/SNF and for recruiting this complex to the Ric‐8B gene to mediate transcriptional repression. We find that both C/EBPβ‐LAP* and SWI/SNF simultaneously bind to the Ric‐8B promoter in differentiating osteoblasts that repress Ric‐8B expression. This decreased expression of Ric‐8B is not accompanied by significant changes in histone acetylation at the Ric‐8B gene promoter sequence. A single aminoacid change at the C/EBPβ‐LAP* N‐terminus (R3L) that inhibits C/EBPβ‐LAP*‐SWI/SNF interaction, also prevents SWI/SNF recruitment to the Ric‐8B promoter as well as C/EBPβ‐LAP*‐dependent repression of the Ric‐8B gene. Inducible expression of the C/EBPβ‐LAP*R3L protein in stably transfected osteoblastic cells demonstrates that this mutant protein binds to C/EBPβ‐LAP*‐target promoters and competes with the endogenous C/EBPβ factor. Together our results indicate that a functional N‐terminus in C/EBPβ‐LAP* is required for interacting with SWI/SNF and for Ric‐8B gene repression in osteoblasts. J. Cell. Physiol. 229: 1521–1528, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Abstract The regulatory information for phenotype, proliferation, and growth of normal and tumor cells must be maintained through genome replication in the S phase and cell division during mitosis. Epigenetic mechanisms that include DNA methylation, posttranslational modifications of histones, selective utilization of histone variants, and inheritable RNA molecules play pivotal roles in maintaining cellular identity through mitotic divisions. Recent studies demonstrate that mitotic occupancy of genes, which are determinants of cell fate, growth, and proliferation, by lineage-restricted transcription factors is a key epigenetic mechanism for retention and transmission of cellular expression memory. Evidence is emerging for the presence of distinct transcriptional regulatory microenvironments in mitotic chromosomes in which the genes bookmarked for reactivation postmitotically reside. Importantly, some oncoproteins are present in mitotic microenvironments where they occupy target genes during mitosis and may contribute to perpetuating the transformed phenotype. We discuss emerging regulatory implications of epigenetically bookmarking genes during mitosis for physiologic control as well as for the onset and progression of cancer. Cancer Res; 74(2); 420–5. ©2014 AACR.