Vanpoucke, Filiep J.

Background/Objectives: Electrode impedance is crucial for optimizing cochlear implant (CI) stimulation and hearing outcomes. While typically stable, some patients experience unexplained impedance fluctuations. This study used electrode impedance subcomponent analysis to identify the subcomponents contributing to these impedance fluctuations. Methods: This study analyzed clinical electrode impedances and transimpedance matrix (TIM) measurements in 10 CI patients with Nucleus devices (CI422, CI522, or CI622 electrode arrays) who exhibited fluctuating or rising electrode impedances. TIM measurements used a cathodic-leading biphasic pulse (110 CLs, 75 µs/phase, 7 µs interphase interval). Electrode impedances were determined at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 75 µs, and subcomponents (access resistance [near-field/far-field] and polarization impedance [Warburg capacitance/Faraday resistance]) were calculated. Results: Both access resistance and polarization impedance changes contributed to impedance fluctuations. Large changes in near-field resistance compared to far-field resistance were associated with increased resistance to current flow closer to the surface of the electrode. The decreased double-layer capacitance and slightly increased Faraday resistance further suggested increased resistance to charge transfer at the electrode–electrolyte interface. Conclusions: Electrode impedance subcomponent analysis reveals changes in the electrochemical reaction at the electrode surface that cause fluctuating or rising CI electrode impedances.

Objectives A small number of cochlear implant (CI) users experience facial nerve stimulation (FNS), which can manifest as facial twitching. In some patients, this can be resolved by adjusting the electrical stimulation parameters. However, for others, facial stimulation can significantly impair CI outcomes or even prevent its use. The exact mechanisms underlying FNS are unclear and may vary among patients. Design Transimpedance measurements were used to assess lateral and longitudinal spread of current within 15 cochlea of nucleus CI recipients with FNS (13 unilateral recipients and 1 bilateral recipient). We compared the transimpedance measurements with programming parameters from clinical visits and pre- and postoperative temporal bone computed tomography (CT) scans to identify factors that may contribute to FNS in each CI ear. Results In nine ears, transimpedance curves showed inflection, which suggests a localized current sink within the cochlea. This indicates a low-impedance pathway through which current exits the cochlea and stimulates the labyrinthine segment of the facial nerve canal. Electrodes near this current sink were disabled or underfit to minimize facial stimulation. In the other seven ears, current flow peaked toward the basal end of the cochlea, suggesting that current exits through the round window or other structures near the basal end of the cochlea, stimulating the tympanic segment of the facial nerve. Conclusions Objective transimpedance measurements can be used to elucidate the mechanisms of FNS and to develop strategies for optimizing electrical stimulation parameters and speech coding to minimize or eliminate FNS in a small subset of CI users.