Brunetti, Lorenzo

Abstract Nucleophosmin mutations are among the most common aberrations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We previously uncovered a novel pivotal role for mutant NPM1 (NPM1c) in the nucleus, where it binds chromatin at key self-renewal gene loci, such as HOXA/B and MEIS1, directly regulating oncogenic transcription. How NPM1c regulates the transcriptional activity of its chromatin targets remains unclear. To identify potential nuclear cooperating partners of NPM1c, we employed TurboID proximity labeling of NPM1c and wild-type NPM1 (NPM1wt). Mass spectrometric analysis revealed an enrichment of nucleoporins in the NPM1c interactome, with Nucleoporin 98 (NUP98) emerging as a top candidate. NUP98, a key component of the nuclear pore complex (NPC), has been established as a critical oncogenic player in AML as part of oncogenic fusion proteins. In these oncofusions the N-terminal FG (phenylalanine-glycine) repeat domain of NUP98 is preserved and fused to a diverse set of partner genes. NUP98-fusion partners are believed to mediate the chromatin binding specificity of the oncoprotein while the NUP98 FG repeats have been shown to form biomolecular condensates that enhance transcriptional output. Interestingly, wild-type NUP98 (NUP98wt) itself has been linked to gene regulatory functions during embryonic development and normal hematopoiesis. However, the role of NUP98wt in transcriptional regulation in the context of leukemia remains unresolved. To explore a potential cooperation between NUP98wt and NPM1c we first validated their interaction by co-immunoprecipitation assays. We next wanted to determine whether NUP98 and NPM1c are recruited to the same chromatin sites. To this end, we performed ChIP-seq in an NPM1c endogenous degrader cell line. These experiments revealed co-occupancy of NUP98 at NPM1c target genes and a significant reduction of NUP98 binding upon degradation of NPM1c. These findings suggest that NPM1c is required for the recruitment of NUP98 to key oncogenic target loci. To dissect the functional role of NUP98wt in NPM1c AML, we performed loss of function studies. CRISPR mediated knock-out of NUP98 in NPM1 mutant (OCI-AML3) cells resulted in a significant repression of NPM1c target genes, including HOXA/B and MEIS1. Given the essential nature of NUP98, we also engineered an endogenous NUP98 degrader system in OCI-AML3 and NPM1wt (MV4-11) cells to allow for the study of the effects of rapid protein depletion. Upon degradation of NUP98, OCI-AML3 cells exhibited robust myeloid differentiation (~70% increase in CD11b) and increased apoptosis (~50% increase in Annexin V+). MV411 cells on the other hand did not show the same differentiation phenotype. To characterize the immediate transcriptional consequences of NUP98 depletion, we performed nascent RNAseq after 1 and 3 hours of degradation. In the first hours of degradation we observed a rapid and significant repression of NPM1c target genes such as HOXA/B cluster genes, MEIS1, SMC4, TNRC18, SATB1/2 and UNCX, thus demonstrating the strong dependency of the NPM1c-driven transcriptional program on the presence of NUP98. In contrast, in MV4-11 cells, NUP98 loss had no effect on HOXA/MEIS1 expression, suggesting a leukemia subtype-specific role of NUP98wt. To delineate the domains of NUP98 required for its chromatin function, we performed a CRISPR gene tiling screen of full-length NUP98 (635 sgRNAs) and based on this we generated several domain-deletion mutants for rescue experiments in the NUP98-degrader cell lines. Retroviral overexpression of the N-terminal FG-repeat containing domains of NUP98 was sufficient to rescue cell viability and prevent the differentiation phenotype typically observed upon NUP98 degradation. Strikingly, gene expression analysis showed that the NUP98 FG-repeats were sufficient to restore the expression of HOXA10, MEIS1, and HOXB9 expression. Overall, our study identifies NUP98wt as a critical cofactor for NPM1c-driven oncogenic transcription. NPM1c recruits NUP98 to its chromatin targets, functionally substituting for an oncogenic fusion partner to concentrate transcriptional condensates at oncogenic loci. This establishes a previously unrecognized, subtype-specific dependency on NUP98wt in leukemogenesis.

Background: Menin, a protein involved in transcriptional regulation, plays a role in the genesis of multiple cancers. Preclinical data from BMF-219, an investigational, highly selective, oral small-molecule inhibitor of menin, show sustained potent abrogation of menin-dependent oncogenic signaling. BMF-219 is the first and only covalent menin inhibitor in clinical development and is being evaluated in multiple hematologic malignancies, solid tumors, and diabetes mellitus. COVALENT-101 (NCT05153330) is a Phase I dose-escalation and -expansion study of BMF-219 in R/R AL (Cohort 1), DLBCL (Cohort 2), MM (Cohort 3), and CLL (Cohort 4). Here we report preliminary safety, PK and anticancer activity data from Cohort 1 (AL). Methods: Doses of BMF-219 are escalated independently for each indication, initially in single-subject cohorts followed by a “3 + 3” design. Eligible patients (pts) include adults with R/R AL ineligible for standard therapy. Initially pts were enrolled agnostic to molecular status. A subsequent amendment introduced quotas for KMT2Ar (MLL1r), NPM1 and other known menin-dependent mutations: CEBP/A, MLL1-PTD, MN1, NUP98, NUP214, PICALM-AF10, SETBP1. Prior exposure to reversible menin inhibitor therapy is permitted. Subjects receive BMF-219 daily for continuous 28-day cycles until progression/intolerability. There are 2 parallel dose-escalation arms: pts not taking (Arm A) or taking (Arm B) moderate or strong CYP3A4 inhibitors. The study is ongoing and accruing in the escalation. Expansion cohorts will enroll pts to obtain further safety and efficacy data at the OBD/RP2D. Results: As of data cutoff of 7/24/2023, 26 pts with R/R AL (24 AML; 2 ALL) are enrolled; 7 remain on study treatment. Baseline characteristics include 17(65%) males and 9(35%) females with a median age of 57.5 years (range 33-84). There is a median of 4 (range 1-8) prior lines of therapy and 11 (42%) with prior HSCT(s). Six pts (23%) had KMT2Ar, 3 (12%) KMT2A-PTD, 4 (15%) NPM1, and 13 (50%) WT for KMT2A and NPM1. Dosing began with single-patient cohorts at 100 mg QD (Arm A) and 25 mg QD (Arm B) and has been escalated through 4 dose levels. Thus far, pts have been dosed up to 500 mg QD (Arm A) and 125 mg QD (Arm B). BMF-219 exposures were comparable between arms, with ~2-4-fold higher exposures observed with co-administration of a moderate or strong CYP3A4 inhibitor. At the highest dose (DL4) in which PK was evaluated, Arm A (500 mg QD) and Arm B (125 mg QD), pts on average achieved ~50% of target exposure (2000 ng*hr/mL) with some pts surpassing it. Higher QD dosing or corresponding BID dosing is expected to achieve desired exposure. BMF-219 has generally been well tolerated with no DLTs observed and no discontinuations due to treatment-related toxicities. No related QTc prolongation was observed. At the time of data cutoff, 23 of 26 pts were included in the safety population. Common TRAEs (≥10%) include vomiting 13% (3) and Differentiation Syndrome (DS) 13% (3). No Grade 5 TRAEs were reported. The only common Grade ≥3 TRAE (≥5%) was DS 13% (3). The efficacy evaluable population includes AML pts who meet the following criteria: dosed at or near predicted efficacious dose (500 mg or above [Arm A]; 125 mg or above [Arm B]), had known menin-dependent mutations, and completed at least one scheduled response assessment (or had a minimum of 7 doses if discontinued prematurely). Thus far, 2 of 5 efficacy evaluable patients achieved a complete remission (1 CR; 1 CRi) and both continue BMF-219 treatment. Patient A: 39/M, NUP98-NSD1, ECOG=0, 500 mg QD, Arm A, 4 prior lines of treatment including intensive chemotherapy and allo-HSCT. At C1D27, marrow blasts were reduced to 6% from 13% at study entry. The patient achieved CR at C2D28 with 0% blasts.Patient B: 70/F, NPM1m, ECOG=1, 125 mg QD, Arm B, 1 prior line of treatment with decitabine and an investigational agent. At C1D28, marrow blasts were reduced to 34% from 52% at study entry. The patient achieved CRi with 3% blasts at C2D28. Conclusion: BMF-219 is generally well tolerated with no DLT observed (and able to be taken with and without CYP3A4 inhibitors) with no pts discontinuing therapy due to toxicity. BMF-219 dose escalation is ongoing and approaching target exposure. BMF-219 demonstrates early signs of clinical activity in different genomic subgroups. The trial is ongoing and includes enrollment for pts diagnosed with AL, DLBCL, MM and CLL.