Millstine, Denise

e21684 Background: Pharmacologic therapy stabilizes hematologic counts and splenomegaly in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), however only partial symptom improvement typically occurs. Evidenced-based supportive care interventions are needed, however data is limited in patients with MPNs. Methods: Patients were recruited internationally via social media. Informed consent and online self-report surveys (Qualtrics) were completed capturing patient demographics, disease specific data, supportive care utilization, and symptom burden via MPN-SAF TSS. ANOVA, chi square tests, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests methods were applied. Results: Patients:1087 patient surveys were consented. Of these, 858 had 10 or more responses. There were 338 essential thrombocytosis (ET), 188 myelofibrosis (MF), 315 polycythemia vera (PV), and 17 other. In MF: DIPSS risk categories included low (8%), Int-1 (19%), Int-2 (29%), high (12%), and unknown (32%). Supportive care:The most frequently utilized therapies were aerobic activity in 442 patients (51.5%), massage in 244 (28.4%), yoga in 220(25.6%), nutrition in 216 (25.1%), and strength training in 204 (23.7%). Symptom association: Among all respondents, aerobic activity (p=<0.001), massage (p=<0.001), yoga (p=0.02), and strength training (p=<0.001) was associated with lower symptom burden by the MPN-SAF TSS however, nutrition was not (p=0.10). In ET and PV subgroups, yoga intervention was no longer statistically significant (p=0.35, p=0.14). In the MF subgroup, no intervention was found to be significant in any risk category. Conclusions: Supportive care with aerobic activity, massage, yoga, and strength training is associated with improved symptom burden in patients with MPN. Further studies are needed to understand the benefits of such therapies. [Table: see text]

Purpose of review Due to medical advances and an aging population, the number of cancer survivors continues to rise. Survivors often experience late and long-term sequelae of cancer and its treatment (e.g., fatigue, pain, fear of recurrence, and stress). As a result, some patients have utilized or expressed interest in integrative medicine (IM) modalities for prevention of recurrence, optimizing health, enhancing quality of life, and managing symptoms. The purpose of this review is to focus on research published during the past year that informs our understanding of the utility of IM for cancer survivors. Recent findings Physical activity, diet, dietary supplements, mind–body modalities, acupuncture, and massage therapy all may play a role in the management of the physical (e.g., fatigue and pain) and emotional (e.g., anxiety and fear) issues faced by cancer survivors. Summary IM therapies are appealing to and utilized by many cancer survivors and may reduce symptom burden. Clinicians who provide cancer survivorship care may improve patient care by understanding the evidence for and against their use.

169 Background: The majority of patients with cancer incorporate integrative medicine strategies into their cancer experience however; patient reported preferences and impact on quality of life is limited. We present cancer patient utilization for specific integrative medicine modalities within the Mayo Clinic Arizona Comprehensive Cancer center and describe the patient perceived impact on quality of life. Methods: Patients and family members attending the 2015 Living with Cancer Symposium at Mayo Clinic Arizona completed a survey indicating whether specific integrative medicine modalities were utilized during cancer treatment and whether utilization had an impact on the patients perceived quality of life. Patient diagnoses and stage were collected. A total of 119 patient surveys were completed and analyzed. Results: The patient diagnoses included hematologic malignancies (27%), breast (25%), prostate (18%), and other (30%). Disease stage was nearly evenly distributed with stage I (21%), stage II (20%), stage III (16%), stage IV (15%), and unknown (28%). The most commonly utilized integrative modalities included nutrition (54%), natural product supplementation (34%), massage (33%), exercise (31%) including yoga (23%) and tai chi (1%), breathing and meditation interventions (26-28%), support groups (23%), and pet therapy (17%). The majority of patients (64%) reported integrative intervention utilization led to an enhanced quality of life during cancer therapy. Conclusions: At a single academic cancer center, in a cancer type and stage diverse population, the majority of patients (64%) reported improved quality of life during cancer therapy with integrative medicine intervention utilization. Nutrition, natural product supplementation, massage, exercise, and meditative modalities were most commonly utilized. Interestingly, a large proportion of patients analyzed in this questionnaire-based study were afflicted with hematologic disease, a population underrepresented in the current integrative medicine intervention research. More studies exploring the feasibility and impact of integrative therapies in the hematologic patient population are needed.

Objectives: To understand the extent and modalities of integrative medicine strategies that patients with coccidioidomycosis (valley fever) have incorporated into their treatment regimens. Design: A direct patient survey was distributed, with 100 unique responses, at a single infectious diseases clinic at an academic medical center in Arizona. Eligible patients, defined as those with confirmed coccidioidomycosis or currently under evaluation, were polled on their personal use of 36 integrative medicine modalities. Patients were also asked to indicate their level of fatigue on a 10-point scale in an attempt to correlate levels of fatigue to use of specific integrative medicine modalities. Results: Of the patients surveyed, 64% had used at least one integrative medicine modality, and 53% used two or more, along with conventional medical therapy. The top three modalities were nutrition (39%), massage (27%), and breathing exercises (26%). The mean reported fatigue level was 4.7 on a 10-point scale, with a standard deviation of 3.0. There was no statistically significant association between use of a specific modality and reported level of fatigue. Conclusions: Nearly two thirds of patients (64%) surveyed had used at least one integrative medicine modality throughout the course of their therapy. Clinicians are probably unaware of the extent to which many patients, including this population, have embraced integrative medicine. Awareness of patients' goal and preferences is valuable in shared clinical decision making.