Heggermont, Ward

Abstract Acute Myocarditis (AM) encompasses a broad spectrum of clinical presentations and causes. Despite the recent advances in cardiovascular imaging, pathology, virology, and genetics, specific therapies are still lacking. This collaborative review aims to analyse the current evidence to answer practical questions that physicians may face during the early management of patients presenting with an acute form of the disease, complicated or not. This review analyses current evidence to address practical questions posed by acute cardiovascular physicians during the early management of acute, or potentially, myocarditis. Based on the current literature, this review provides a step-by-step approach to treat AM patients from their admission in the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) to discharge, by answering 10 clinical questions: Might this patient be suffering from an AM? Should I hospitalize this patient and, if so, where? Which cardiac imaging exam should I perform and what can I learn from it? Is this patient requiring an EMB? What should the non-invasive aetiological work-up be? Is her/his episode of AM of viral, toxic, or other origin? Does this patient need specific treatments or mechanical circulatory support? Is there an indication for guideline-directed medical heart failure treatment? When can the patient be discharged and resume physical activity? Notably, this review highlights the need to build a multidisciplinary response team to address the many diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of AM patients. It also points out the lack of evidence to guide the treatment of these patients.

Abstract Background Current oncological treatments improved survival but also increased awareness of cardiovascular side-effects following cancer therapy. Anthracyclines are a class of highly effective chemotherapeutics, yet their use is regularly complicated by anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity (AIC). The advent of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac myocytes (iPSC-CMs) offers the potential for disease modeling and prediction of genetic cardiomyopathies. Purpose We aim to use iPSC-CMs to assess susceptibility to cardiotoxicity induced by anti-cancer treatments on an individual patient level. Furthermore, the assay could be exploited to unravel cellular processes and pathways involved in AIC. Methods Five heart transplant patients following AIC and five anthracycline treated patients without AIC were included in our study. We reprogrammed patient-derived lymphocytes from both groups toward iPSCs using Sendai Virus; afterwards, patient derived iPSCs were differentiated into CM-like cells. Cytotoxicity following chemotherapy exposure was assessed using flow cytometry (FC), in which iPSC-CM-specific cells were first selected based on the expression of signal-regulatory protein alpha (SIRPA) surface marker; thereafter the percentage of apoptotic versus viable cells following doxorubicin exposure was quantitatively assessed. Ultrastructural changes were evaluated using electron microscopy (EM) images, comparing doxorubicin treated and untreated iPSC-CMs. Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) generation following doxorubicin exposure was assessed using a luciferin precursor-based plate reader assay (ROS-GLO) and FC. Furthermore, whole genome sequencing (WGS) was performed and variants were filtered based on allele frequency, pathogenicity using HumVar trained variant effect predictors and presence in patients versus controls. Results The cytotoxic effect of increasing concentrations of doxorubicin was quantifiable using FC on SIRPA positive iPSC-CMs (Figure 1 panel A). On the ultrastructural level, doxorubicin treated iPSC-CMs manifested darker and more condensed mitochondria as seen with EM (Figure 1 panel B). Increased ROS production was observed following doxorubicin exposure as assessed using ROS-GLO plate reader assay and FC (Figure 1 panel C). We used iPSC-CMs of transplant patients and matched controls to assess inter-individual susceptibility to anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity. Included patient profiles can be found in Figure 2 panel A. There was a higher rate of cell death at any concentration of doxorubicin in patients with proven AIC as opposed to controls (Figure 2 panel B). WGS analysis showed 2 pathogenic variants in the PRAMEF6 gene present in cases and not in controls (Figure 3 panel C). Conclusion iPSC-CMs represent a robust disease model to study cancer therapy-induced cardiotoxicity. Furthermore, iPSC-CMs allow to study inter-individual differences in susceptibility to cancer therapy-induced cardiotoxicity.Mechanism of AICSusceptibility to AIC

Background: Anthracyclines are a class of highly effective chemotherapeutics, yet their use is regularly complicated by anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity (AIC). The advent of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac myocytes (iPSC-CMs) offers the potential for disease modeling and prediction of genetic cardiomyopathies. Purpose: We aim to use iPSC-CMs to assess susceptibility to AIC. Methods: Five AIC heart transplant patients and five anthracycline treated patients without AIC were included in our study. We reprogrammed lymphocytes from both groups toward iPSCs using Sendai Virus, followed by differentiation into CM-like cells. Cytotoxicity following chemotherapy exposure was assessed using flow cytometry (FC), electron microscopy (EM) and reactive oxygen species generation (ROS). Furthermore, whole genome sequencing (WGS) was performed and variants were filtered based on allele frequency, pathogenicity using HumVar trained variant effect predictors and presence in patients versus controls. Results: The cytotoxic effect of increasing concentrations of doxorubicin was quantifiable using FC on SIRPA positive iPSC-CMs ( A ). There was a higher rate of cell death at any concentration of doxorubicin in patients with AIC as opposed to controls ( B ). On the ultrastructural level, doxorubicin treated iPSC-CMs manifested darker and more condensed mitochondria as seen with EM ( C ). Increased ROS production was observed following doxorubicin exposure ( D ). WGS analysis showed 2 pathogenic variants in the PRAMEF6 gene present in cases and not in controls ( E ). Conclusion: iPSC-CMs represent a robust disease model to study mechanisms of and susceptibility to AIC.