Parikh, Shital N.

Objectives: Current standard of care after a First-Time patellar instability event is non-operative management, with exceptions for patients with osteochondral fracture or loose body requiring immediate surgical intervention, patients with significant pathoanatomy, or contralateral patellar instability. For recurrent patellar instability, there is controversy as to when isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL-R) is enough. The purpose of this study is to determine (1) the comparative outcomes of isolated MPFL-R after first-time patellar instability (FTPI) and recurrent patellar instability (RPI) and (2) the impact of osteochondral injury on outcomes after surgical treatment of FTPI. Methods: A prospective, multicenter cohort study (JUPITER: Justifying Patellar Instability Treatment by Results) database was queried for patients who underwent patellar stabilization surgery (PSS) between December 2016 and September 2022. Patients were included if they underwent a medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL-R) for FTPI or RPI. Those with less than 2 years of clinical follow-up, revision PSS, or concomitant bony procedures at the time of MPFL-R were excluded. Independent t-tests were performed to compare means for continuous variables, and chi-squared tests were performed to compare frequency for categorical variables, between groups. Results: A total of 739 patients met inclusion criteria with a mean age of 15.6 ± 3.3 years, and 59.9% female sex. FTPI occurred in 216 (27.2%) patients, and of these 104 (48.1%) sustained an operative chondral or osteochondral lesion. Those with FTPI had a significantly greater trochlear depth (2.9 mm vs. 2.6 mm; P = .048), but a significantly lower rate of pathological trochlear bump > 5 mm (52.3% vs. 67.8%; P = .008) than those with RPI (Table 1). Among the FTPI cohort, those with treatment of a chondral lesion were less likely to have patella alta (Caton-Deschamps Index > 1.3) (14.9% vs. 41.3%, P = .006), and less frequently had a mild or severe J-sign (25.0% vs. 42.7%, p = .016) than those without a chondral intervention (Table 2). Postoperatively, there were no differences with rates of recurrent instability (8.3% vs. 12.3%; P = .130) or return to sport (90.4% vs. 94.5%; P = .182) between FTPI and RPI, respectively (Table 3). There were no differences with rates of recurrent instability (7.6% vs. 9.1%; P = .807) or return to sport (89.1% vs. 91.7%; P = .755) between those with or without a chondral intervention, respectively (Table 4). Conclusions: This study demonstrates no difference in rates of recurrent post-operative instability between FTPI and RPI with rates consistent with the current literature. MPFL reconstruction remains as a durable surgical treatment option for patients presenting with either FTPI or RPI with relatively low rates of recurrent instability. In this patient population, patella alta was found to be protective of osteochondral injury which is also consistent with existing literature. Continued, long-term investigation is needed to understand outcomes for First-Time patellar instability and to better define the indications for surgical interventions in this population.

Background: Tibial spine fractures (TSFs) are uncommon injuries that may result in substantial morbidity in children. A variety of open and arthroscopic techniques are used to treat these fractures, but no single standardized operative method has been identified. Purpose: To systematically review the literature on pediatric TSFs to determine the current treatment approaches, outcomes, and complications. Study Design: Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses) guidelines using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Studies evaluating treatment and outcomes of patients <18 years old were included. Patient demographic characteristics, fracture characteristics, treatments, and outcomes were abstracted. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize categorical and quantitative variables, and a meta-analytic technique was used to compare observational studies with sufficient data. Results: A total of 47 studies were included, totaling 1922 TSFs in patients (66.4% male) with a mean age of 12 years (range, 3-18 years). The operative approach was open reduction and internal fixation in 291 cases and arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation in 1236 cases; screw fixation was used in 411 cases and suture fixation, in 586 cases. A total of 13 nonunions were reported, occurring most frequently in Meyers and McKeever type III fractures (n = 6) and in fractures that were treated nonoperatively (n = 10). Arthrofibrosis rates were reported in 33 studies (n = 1700), and arthrofibrosis was present in 190 patients (11.2%). Range of motion loss occurred significantly more frequently in patients with type III and IV fractures ( P < .001), and secondary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury occurred most frequently in patients with type I and II fractures ( P = .008). No statistically significant differences were found with regard to rates of nonunion, arthrofibrosis, range of motion loss, laxity, or secondary ACL injury between fixation methods (screw vs suture). Conclusion: Despite variation in TSF treatment, good overall outcomes have been reported with low complication rates in both open and arthroscopic treatment and with both screw and suture fixation. Arthrofibrosis remains a concern after surgical treatment for TSF, but no significant difference in incidence was found between the analysis groups. Larger studies are necessary to compare outcomes and form a consensus on how to treat and manage patients with TSFs.