Kenderian, Saad S.

Abstract Despite recent landmark advances in T-cell immunotherapy for the treatment of human cancer, metastatic solid tumors remain an intractable challenge. Macrophages are often the most abundant immune cell in the tumor microenvironment (TME), where they may convert into immunosuppressive (M2) tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and participate in disease progression. Currently, macrophage-orientated immunotherapeutic approaches under clinical development in oncology seek to reduce TAM infiltration (CSF-1 antagonists) or enhance TAM phagocytosis (CD47 antagonists). Transfer of autologous, activated, but nontargeted macrophages failed to demonstrate antitumor efficacy in past clinical trials. We hypothesized that genetically engineering human macrophages with CARs against tumor-associated antigens could redirect their phagocytic activity and lead to therapeutic efficacy with the potential for the induction of an antitumor T-cell response. We first demonstrate that CD3-zeta-based CARs are capable of inducing phagocytosis in human THP-1 macrophages, while truncated intracellular-domain deficient CARs were not. Targeted phagocytosis and clearance of CD19+, mesothelin +, and HER2+ cells by CARs targeted against each respective antigen was significantly superior to that by control untransduced (UTD) macrophages. We demonstrate that primary human macrophages, which are resistant to most viral vectors, are efficiently transduced by the chimeric fiber adenoviral vector Ad5f35 (~70% in 10 normal donors). Using Ad5f35, we engineered primary human macrophages with a CD3-zeta-based CAR against HER2. Anti-HER2 primary human CAR macrophages demonstrated targeted phagocytosis against HER2+ but not HER2- cell lines, with phagocytic activity dependent on both the CAR and antigen densities. Furthermore, CAR, but not UTD, macrophages led to potent dose-dependent killing of three distinct HER2-high cell lines in vitro. We sought to test the efficacy of anti-HER2 primary human macrophages in xenograft models of human HER2+ ovarian cancer. A single dose of CAR, but not UTD macrophages, led to tumor regression and improved overall survival in both intraperitoneal and disseminated models of disease. We show that macrophage transduction with Ad5f35, a double-stranded DNA virus, leads to a broad gene expression change, an interferon signaling signature, and phenotypic clustering toward classically activated M1 macrophages. CAR macrophages upregulated co-stimulatory ligand and antigen processing/presentation genes and led to enhanced T-cell stimulation in vitro and in vivo. Lastly, CAR, but not UTD, macrophages showed a broad resistance for M2 conversion in response to immunosuppressive cytokines. In conclusion, we show that primary human CAR macrophages are capable of targeted tumor phagocytosis, lead to improved overall survival in xenograft models, and demonstrate enhanced T-cell stimulation. CAR macrophages are a novel cell therapy platform for the treatment of human cancer. This abstract is also being presented as Poster B29. Citation Format: Michael Klichinsky, Marco Ruella, Olga Shestova, Andrew Best, Kristin Blouch, Xueqing M. Lu, Saad S. Kenderian, Miriam Y. Kim, Roddy O'Connor, Stephen Wallace, Miroslaw Kozlowski, Dylan M. Marchione, Maksim Shestov, Benjamin A. Garcia, Carl June, Saar Gill. Human chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) macrophages for cancer immunotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy; 2018 Nov 27-30; Miami Beach, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2020;8(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PR07.

7558 Background: A low absolute lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (ALC/AMC) has been found to predict decreased survival in lymphoma patients receiving chemotherapy and stem cell transplant. We report its clinical significance and additional cellular phenotype changes in patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART) therapy. Methods: Records were reviewed for patients (pts) who received axicabtagene ciloleucel between 6/2016 and 12/2020. Receiver operator curve was generated using nominal logistic regression to predict CR as best response. Survivals were calculated using Kaplan- Meier method. Blood immune phenotype were assayed by multiparametric flow. Principle component analysis (PCA) was performed using ClusterVis. Results: Low ALC/AMC (≤0.8) prior to lymphodepletion (LD) chemotherapy on day -5 was associated with lower CR rate (AUC=0.68, Table). Our cohort of 81 pts had similar baseline characteristics except that noted in Table. Low ALC/AMC ratio is associated with shorter EFS and OS (EFS: 2.6 vs. 6.4 months, P<0.0001; OS: 5.3 months vs. not reached, P=0.0006), respectively. Prognostic association remained significant in multivariate analysis including ASCT, bridging therapy and CRP. Interestingly, compared to the high ALC/AMC group, the low ALC/AMC group had decreased CD8 Tem, increased CD16+CCR2+ monocytes and increased monocytes’ producing IL12, IL-10, and IL-1β (n=26). Unsupervised PCA identified 3 clusters: 1. Low ALC/AMC, all non-CR; 2. High ALC/AMC, some non-CR; 3. High ALC/AMC, all CR. Compared to cluster 1 and 2, cluster 3 had increased CD4 Tnaive, CD8 Tcm and IL-17 producing CD4 T and NK cells. Conclusions: ALC/AMC is a clinically accessible test that is strongly associated with CAR-T response and survival. Immune characterization revealed that the biologic effect is not just associated with cell ratio. Increased inflammation has been found to negatively impact CAR-T response, with some cytokines known to be from the myeloid lineage. We show that CRP is elevated in the low ALC/AMC group with increased cytokine production by monocytes. In addition, presence of T cell subset and IL-17 producing cells, before LD, are associated with clinical response. Further investigation on optimizing host immunity may help improve clinical outcome with CAR-T.[Table: see text]

7554 Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) are commonly administered inpatient due to concern for early onset cytokine release syndrome (CRS), especially with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel). We report Mayo Clinic Rochester experience for hospital-based outpatient (HBO) management of patients (pts) receiving axi-cel and identify opportunities for improvement. HBO is closely integrated with inpatient practice and includes the same specialty trained clinical team. It is the first point of contact 24/7 for pts and triage evaluations. Lymphodepletion chemotherapy and CAR-T infusion is given on HBO followed by daily monitoring till day 8 and thereafter, as clinically needed until admission criteria is met. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed database of pts who received axi-cel between 1/2018 and 1/2021. After 06/2020, remote patient monitoring (RPM) tools were implemented to collect patient-reported neurologic symptoms and vital signs via bluetooth-enabled devices 4 times daily through month 1. Adverse data trends are addressed by the HBO team. Results: Among 72 recipients, 89% received their cells outpatient; 8% remained outpatient for the entire month. CRS and neurotoxicity incidence were comparable to those reported from CIBMTR. Median time to first admission was 2 days (Table). Use of bridging therapy, increased CRP and LDH were associated with early admission (≤3 days). Median time to tocilizumab, steroid, oxygen support, vasopressor was 4 days after admission. Half of HBO visits required intervention such as blood transfusions, IV medications through the first month. Nine pts had enrolled in RPM to date; with 8 having evaluable data. With 4 scheduled entries/day, a median of 1 entry/day was skipped and 2 entries/day were answered incompletely. An average of 57 additional unscheduled entries were generated per pt. Among a median of 373 (range 91-522) readings per pt over the first month, 4% (2%-20%) of the readings generated alerts. An average of 4 alerts were seen within 48 hours prior to admission. Data including additional subjects will be presented at ASCO meeting. Conclusions: We report a feasible outpatient care model for management of axi-cel recipients with safe outcomes. Clinical characteristics associated with more aggressive disease are associated with likelihood of early admission. Early RPM experience suggest use of digital tools could improve monitoring compliance and may predict evolution to symptoms requiring escalation of care.[Table: see text]

Abstract The utility of the chronic lymphocytic leukemia-international prognostic index (CLL-IPI) in predicting outcomes of individuals with Rai 0 stage CLL and monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL) is unclear. We identified 969 individuals (415 MBL and 554 Rai 0 CLL; median age, 64 years; 65% men) seen at Mayo Clinic between 1 January 2001 and 1 October 2018, and ascertained time to first therapy (TTFT) and overall survival (OS). After a median follow up of 7 years, the risk of disease progression needing therapy was 2.9%/y for MBL (median, not reached) and 5%/y for Rai 0 CLL (median, 10.4 years). Among patients with low, intermediate, and high/very high-risk CLL-IPI risk groups, the estimated 5-year risk of TTFT was 13.5%, 30%, and 58%, respectively, P&lt; .0001 (c-statistic = 0.69); and the estimated 5-year OS was 96.3%, 91.5%, and 76%, respectively, P&lt; .0001 (c-statistic = 0.65). In a multivariable analysis of absolute B-cell count with individual factors of the CLL-IPI, the absolute B-cell count was associated with shorter TTFT (hazard ratio [HR] for each 10 × 109/L increase: 1.31; P&lt; .0001) and shorter OS (HR: 1.1; P = .02). The OS of the entire cohort was similar to that of the age- and sex-matched general population of Minnesota (P = .17), although Rai 0 CLL patients with high and very high-risk CLL-IPI score had significantly shorter OS (P= .01 and P= .0001, respectively). The results of this study demonstrate the ability of CLL-IPI to predict time from diagnosis to first treatment (an end point not affected by therapy) in a large cohort of patients whose only manifestation of disease is a circulating clonal lymphocyte population.

Introduction: Richter transformation (RT) refers to transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or other aggressive lymphomas. The incidence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of RT with CNS involvement remain undefined. Methods: Biopsy-confirmed RT diagnosed from 4/1993 to 4/2018 was identified from the Mayo Clinic CLL database. RT cases with CNS involvement were further reviewed, with clinical characteristics, treatment and follow-up data abstracted. Overall survival (OS) was defined as time from CNS involvement to death from any cause and analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Among 204 CLL patients with biopsy-proven RT, 15 patients had documented CNS involvement by imaging (parenchymal n=11, ocular n=1, parenchymal and ocular n=1, leptomeningeal n=1, cranial and spinal nerve roots n=1). Biopsy confirmation of CNS involvement was available in 11 patients. Of these 15 patients, 10 had CNS involvement at initial RT diagnosis, and 5 patients developed CNS involvement at RT progression, with a median time from RT diagnosis to CNS involvement of 14.9 months (range 2.8-41.1). Prior to RT, 11 patients (73.3%) received no treatment for CLL, 3 (53.4%) received chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) only (1-3 lines), and 1 patient (6.7%) received CIT (1 line) and ibrutinib. CLL FISH results were available in 9 patients, with del(17p) in 2, trisomy 12 in 2, del(13q) in 3, and normal results in 2. One patient had TP53 mutation (FISH result unavailable). IgHV mutation status was known in 3 patients and 1 was unmutated. The median time to RT was 4.4 years (range 0-11.4). The median age at RT diagnosis was 70 years (range 59-78), and 9 (60%) were male. The histology of RT was DLBCL in all 15 patients (diagnosed by CNS biopsy in 8 and other biopsies in 7), with GCB subtype in 6 and non-GCB subtype in 3. MYC rearrangement was detected in 4 of 6 patients tested, and 2 of those also had BCL-2 rearrangement (MYC/BCL-2 double hit). Of the 10 patients with CNS involvement at initial RT diagnosis, 4 had isolated CNS involvement (confirmed by brain biopsy [n=2] or vitreous biopsy [n=2]). All 4 patients were treated with high dose (HD) methotrexate (MTX) based regimen, and 3 patients achieved complete remission (CR) and underwent autologous stem cell transplant with continued CR, while 1 patient achieved partial remission and received whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) at disease progression. Six patients had both systemic and CNS involvement (confirmed by brain biopsy [n=2] or CSF examination [n=2] in 4; the other 2 were diagnosed by imaging). All 6 patients received CNS directed therapy (HD MTX [n=5] or WBRT [n=1]) as well as systemic therapy (R-CHOP [n=5] or HyperCVAD [n=1]), with varied short duration of disease control (Figure 1A). Of the 5 patients who developed CNS involvement at RT progression (after 1-2 lines of therapy including first-line R-CHOP), 2 had isolated CNS involvement (1 was confirmed by CSF examination and the other was by imaging only). Both were treated with HD MTX based regimen, and 1 achieved a durable remission of 2 years but eventually had CNS relapse, while the other had no response and received WBRT with limited benefit. Three patients had both systemic and CNS involvement (2 were confirmed by CSF examination and the other was by imaging only), and all 3 patients were treated with HD MTX based regimen but all had CNS disease progression within 3 months (Figure 1A). The OS after CNS involvement for all 15 RT patients was 9.4 months (95% CI 2.3-19.1). Patients with CNS involvement at initial RT diagnosis had numerically longer OS compared to patients who developed CNS involvement at RT progression (median OS 13.0 vs 4.1 months, P = 0.137; Figure 1B). Patients with isolated CNS involvement had better OS compared to patients with both CNS and systemic involvement (median OS 32.0 vs 5.3 months, P = 0.009; Figure 1C). Three of the 4 patients who only had isolated CNS involvement at the time of RT diagnosis have ongoing long term remission and survival (Figure 1A). Conclusions: In this large series of RT, approximately 1 in 14 patients had CNS involvement. Patients with isolated CNS involvement appeared to have favorable long term outcome; however, RT patients with both systemic and CNS involvement had extremely poor survival. The incidence, molecular characteristics, and optimal management of RT with CNS involvement in the novel agent era warrant future multicenter studies. Disclosures Wang: Incyte: Research Funding; Innocare: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Parikh:GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria; Verastem Oncology: Honoraria. Kay:Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Meyer Squib: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cytomx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morpho-sys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rigel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncotracker: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dava Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Juno Theraputics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Witzig:AbbVie: Consultancy; MorphSys: Consultancy; Immune Design: Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Spectrum: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding. Nowakowski:MorphoSys: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy; Denovo: Consultancy; Kymera: Consultancy; Ryvu: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other; Curis: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Nanostrings: Research Funding. Ansell:Trillium: Research Funding; AI Therapeutics: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Kenderian:MorphoSys: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Torque: Consultancy; Humanigen: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Lentigen: Research Funding; Mettaforge: Patents & Royalties. Ding:DTRM: Research Funding; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MEI Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding.

Introduction: Richter's syndrome (RS) represents transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) into a highly aggressive lymphoma with dismal prognosis. Transcriptomic alterations have been described in CLL but most studies focused on peripheral blood samples with minimal data on RS-involved tissue. Moreover, transcriptomic features of RS have not been well defined in the era of CLL novel therapies. In this study we investigated transcriptomic profiles of CLL/RS-involved nodal tissue using samples from a clinical trial cohort of refractory CLL and RS patients treated with Pembrolizumab (NCT02332980). Methods: Nodal samples from 9 RS and 4 CLL patients in MC1485 trial cohort were reviewed and classified as previously published (Ding et al, Blood 2017). All samples were collected prior to Pembrolizumab treatment. Targeted gene expression profiling of 789 immune-related genes were performed on FFPE nodal samples using Nanostring nCounter® Analysis System (NanoString Technologies, Seattle, WA). Differential expression analysis was performed using NanoStringDiff. Genes with 2 fold-change in expression with a false-discovery rate less than 5% were considered differentially expressed. Results: The details for the therapy history of this cohort were illustrated in Figure 1a. All patients exposed to prior ibrutinib before the tissue biopsy had developed clinical progression while receiving ibrutinib. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering using the 300 most variable genes in expression revealed two clusters: C1 and C2 (Figure 1b). C1 included 4 RS and 3 CLL treated with prior chemotherapy without prior ibrutinib, and 1 RS treated with prior ibrutinib. C2 included 1 CLL and 3 RS received prior ibrutinib, and 1 RS treated with chemotherapy. The segregation of gene expression profiles in samples was largely driven by recent exposure to ibrutinib. In C1 cluster (majority had no prior ibrutinb), RS and CLL samples were clearly separated into two subgroups (Figure 1b). In C2 cluster, CLL 8 treated with ibrutinib showed more similarity in gene expression to RS, than to other CLL samples treated with chemotherapy. In comparison of C2 to C1, we identified 71 differentially expressed genes, of which 34 genes were downregulated and 37 were upregulated in C2. Among the upregulated genes in C2 (majority had prior ibrutinib) are known immune modulating genes including LILRA6, FCGR3A, IL-10, CD163, CD14, IL-2RB (figure 1c). Downregulated genes in C2 are involved in B cell activation including CD40LG, CD22, CD79A, MS4A1 (CD20), and LTB, reflecting the expected biological effect of ibrutinib in reducing B cell activation. Among the 9 RS samples, we compared gene profiles between the two groups of RS with or without prior ibrutinib therapy. 38 downregulated genes and 10 upregulated genes were found in the 4 RS treated with ibrutinib in comparison with 5 RS treated with chemotherapy. The top upregulated genes in the ibrutinib-exposed group included PTHLH, S100A8, IGSF3, TERT, and PRKCB, while the downregulated genes in these samples included MS4A1, LTB and CD38 (figure 1d). In order to delineate the differences of RS vs CLL, we compared gene expression profiles between 5 RS samples and 3 CLL samples that were treated with only chemotherapy. RS samples showed significant upregulation of 129 genes and downregulation of 7 genes. Among the most significantly upregulated genes are multiple genes involved in monocyte and myeloid lineage regulation including TNFSF13, S100A9, FCN1, LGALS2, CD14, FCGR2A, SERPINA1, and LILRB3. Conclusion: Our study indicates that ibrutinib-resistant, RS-involved tissues are characterized by downregulation of genes in B cell activation, but with PRKCB and TERT upregulation. Furthermore, RS-involved nodal tissues display the increased expression of genes involved in myeloid/monocytic regulation in comparison with CLL-involved nodal tissues. These findings implicate that differential therapies for RS and CLL patients need to be adopted based on their prior therapy and gene expression signatures. Studies using large sample size will be needed to verify this hypothesis. Figure Disclosures Zhao: Merck: Current Employment. Blumenschein:Merck: Current Employment. Yearley:Merck: Current Employment. Wang:Novartis: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Innocare: Research Funding. Parikh:Verastem Oncology: Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kenderian:Sunesis: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Humanigen: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; Lentigen: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Mettaforge: Patents & Royalties; Torque: Consultancy; Kite: Research Funding; Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Kay:Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Juno Theraputics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dava Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncotracker: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sunesis: Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Research Funding; Agios Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Meyer Squib: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rigel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morpho-sys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cytomx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Braggio:DASA: Consultancy; Bayer: Other: Stock Owner; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding. Ding:DTRM: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MEI Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CART) cells are engineered with an artificial receptor which redirects T cells to recognize cancer cells expressing a particular surface antigen. CART cell therapy has been astonishingly successful at eradicating certain B cell malignancies, but relapse is common, and efficacy is lacking in many cancers. Gene editing of CART cells is being investigated to enhance efficacy and safety and to develop off-the-shelf products. Currently, genome engineering tools used to modify CART cells include zinc finger nucleases, transposons, TALENs, and CRISPR-Cas9. CRISPR-Cas9 uses a trans-activating (tracrRNA): CRISPR RNA (crRNA) duplex to trigger imprecise DNA repair through targeted double stranded breaks, causing indels and often resulting in loss of protein function. Gene-edited CART cells have entered the clinic to provide an allogeneic cell source (TALEN TCRα knockout), safer treatment (CRISPR-Cas9 GM-CSF knockout), and resistance to exhaustion (CRISPR-Cas9 PD-1 knockout). CRISPR-Cas9 PD-1 knockout (PD-1k/o) CART cells were well-tolerated in a first-in-human clinical trial. However, clinically tested CRISPR-Cas9-edited CART cells showed only modest loss of function (~25%) of PD-1 upon infusion. Additionally, off-target editing has been observed in the clinic and remains a concern. We hypothesized that using next-generation CRISPR-Cas12a systems will result in enhanced editing efficiency and precision. CRISPR-Cas12a has a smaller protein component than CRISPR-Cas9, uses a single crRNA without a tracrRNA for simplified delivery and leaves staggered 5' overhangs. These properties, along with lower intrinsic off-target activity than Cas9, render Cas12a a powerful gene editing tool. First, we compared the knockout efficiency of Cas9 and Cas12a in three therapeutically relevant genetic targets in T cells by delivering ribonucleoprotein complexes containing the crRNA and Cas protein of interest. We showed that Cas12a more effectively knocked out CD3, GM-CSF, and PD-1 expression compared to Cas9 (Figure 1A), demonstrating the potential of Cas12a in further genetically editing T cell therapies. We then used electroporation with Cas9 and Cas12a to generate PD-1k/o in lentivirally transduced CD19-targeted CART (CART19) cells with the aim of making exhaustion-resistant CART19 cells through CRISPR gene editing. CART19 and PD-1k/o CART19 cells were repeatedly stimulated with CD19+ NALM6 target cells for one week, and exhaustion marker expression was measured over time with flow cytometry. The expression of CTLA4, TIM3, and LAG3 were similar between CART19 groups, but PD-1 expression was lower in Cas9 PD-1k/o CART19 cells and almost completely eradicated in Cas12a PD-1k/o CART19 cells compared to wildtype or mock shocked CART19 cells (Figure 1B). We then compared the functionality of wildtype, mock shocked, and Cas9 or Cas12a PD-1k/o CART19 cells in vitro to ensure that neither the electroporation process nor PD-1 knockout impaired CART19 cell antitumor activity. Over a range of effector-to-target ratios and with repeated stimulation with target cells, cytotoxicity was comparable across all CART19 cell groups (Figure 1C). All CART19 cell groups demonstrated robust proliferation in response to both nonspecific and antigen-specific stimulation and over one week of repeated antigen stimulation with NALM6 target cells (Figure 1D). We also confirmed that all CART19 cell groups demonstrated strong degranulation and cytokine production in response to nonspecific and antigen-specific stimulation, regardless of electroporation or PD-1 knockout (Figure 1E). In summary, our data demonstrate that Cas12a can be used as a gene editing tool to efficiently knock out therapeutically relevant genes in CART19 cell therapy. Additionally, Cas12a demonstrated improved knockout efficiency over Cas9 in three different genomic targets. PD-1 knockout via Cas9 or Cas12a reduced PD-1 expression on the CART19 cell surface, and PD-1 expression was almost completely ablated with Cas12a gene editing. Electroporation and PD-1 knockout did not impact the effector functions of the CART19 cells, including cytotoxicity, degranulation, cytokine secretion, or proliferation. In vivo studies assessing the antitumor efficacy and CART19 cell persistence are ongoing. Overall, Cas12a is a promising, efficient method of gene knockout to enhance the safety and efficacy of CART cells. Disclosures Sakemura: Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Cox:Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Kenderian:MorphoSys: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Torque: Consultancy; Humanigen: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Mettaforge: Patents & Royalties; Lentigen: Research Funding.

Abstract BACKGROUND Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CART) therapy has revolutionized the treatment landscape for hematological malignancies, its efficacy remains limited in solid tumors. EGFRvIII is a truncated version of the wild type EGFR in which deletion of exons 2–7 of the extracellular domain leads the variant (EGFRvIII) that is strongly antigenic and is mostly expressed on tumor cells. EGFR amplification (tEGFR) almost uniformly precedes the presence of EGFRvIII on tumor cells. The heterogeneity of surface receptor expression and immunosuppressive stromal microenvironment underscore the need to develop CART strategies to target multiple tumor antigens simultaneously. METHODS we generated tEGFR/EGFRvIII directed CAR construct by cloning a clinically relevant tEGFR and EGFRvIII specific scFv into a second generation CAR construct (41BB stimulated) in a third generation lentivirus backbone. This was used to transfect 293T cells and the generated lentivirus particles were used to transduce T cells and generate EGFRvIII/tEGFR CART cells. GBM primary patient derived cell lines were used in these experiments. These cells were passaged and maintained in patient derived xenograft models. RESULTS EGFRvIII/tEGFR directed CART cells exhibited potent antitumor activity against EGFRvIII/tEGFR + GBM cell lines: with 100% killing at 1.25:1, 2.5:1, 5:1 and 10:1 E:T ratio on multiple PDX cell lines with EGFRvIII expression and EGFR over-expression (greater than five copies of EGFR gene) at 24 hours of incubation. Conclusion: We demonstrate that targeting EGFRvIII and over-expressed EGFR with CART cells is feasible, efficacious and represents a promising therapeutic strategy to target GMB. Data from in vivo and combinatorial CART experiments will be reported at the meeting.