Liesinger, Amanda M.

AbstractBackgroundUsing an objective mathematical algorithm to assess corticolimbic involvement of neurofibrillary tangle pathology, we identified three AD subtypes: hippocampal sparing (HpSp) AD, typical AD, and limbic predominant AD. Typical AD brains were representative of the expected patterns of hippocampal and cortical involvement as outlined by Braak tangle stage. In contrast, we discovered an extreme phenotype that exists outside of the Braakian‐concept of neurofibrillary tangle patterns. Hippocampal sparing AD cases demonstrate unexpected sparing of the hippocampus relative to severely involved association cortices and limbic predominant AD cases demonstrate inundation of the hippocampus relative to mildly involved association cortices. Using these AD subtypes, our objective was to leverage our understanding of disease spectrum to uncover transcriptomic changes that underlie selective vulnerability of the hippocampus in AD.MethodWe performed RNA‐sequencing in 40 neuropathologically diagnosed AD cases (10 HpSp, 20 Typical and 10 Limbic) and 15 controls to uncover gene expression changes associated with phenotype differences allowing us to prioritize 44 genes for further exploration. Validation with NanoString and quantification with digital pathology were performed in an expanded cohort of 158 AD cases (36 HpSp, 79 Typical and 35 Limbic) and 32 controls. We quantified digital pathology measures of early tangle pathology (CP13), mature tangle pathology (Ab39), amyloid‐β (33.1.1). In addition, we measured cellular markers for microglia (CD68), endothelia (CD34), and astroglia (GFAP). Deep learning based prediction models were employed, which nominated the SLC38A2 gene as a predictor of AD.ResultThe SLC38A2 gene was originally prioritized in our RNA‐sequencing data based upon differential expression between controls and typical AD. We observed upregulation of SLC38A2 in all AD subtypes. RNA‐seq gene expression measures validated well with NanoString for SLC38A2 (R=0.97, p<0.001). Regression analysis identified early tangle (p=0.011) and late tangle measures (p=0.026) as significant predictors of gene expression, but not amyloid measures (p=0.74). Microgliosis approached significance (p=0.052), but with no contribution from endothelial cell burden (p=0.17) or astrogliosis (p=0.58). Age approached significance (p=0.06), but not sex (p=0.88) or APOE‐ε4 status (p=0.10).ConclusionOur data supports consideration of intra‐disease divergence with regard to case stratification and may reveal genes previously masked by heterogeneity of cohorts.

AbstractIntroductionOur primary goal was to examine demographic and clinicopathologic differences across an ethnoracially diverse autopsy‐confirmed cohort of Alzheimer's disease cases.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted in the Florida Autopsied Multi‐Ethnic cohort on 1625 Alzheimer's disease cases, including decedents who self‐reported as Hispanic/Latino (n = 67), black/African American (n = 19), and white/European American (n = 1539).ResultsHispanic decedents had a higher frequency of family history of cognitive impairment (58%), an earlier age at onset (median age of 70 years), longer disease duration (median of 12 years), and lower MMSE proximal to death (median of 4 points) compared with the other ethnoracial groups. Black decedents had a lower Braak tangle stage (stage V) and higher frequency of coexisting hippocampal sclerosis (21%); however, only hippocampal sclerosis differences survived adjustment for sex, age at onset, and disease duration. Neither Thal amyloid phase nor coexisting Lewy body disease differed across ethnoracial groups.DiscussionDespite a smaller sample size, Hispanics demonstrated longer disease duration with Alzheimer's disease, but not greater lifespan. Neuropathologic differences across ethnoracial groups supported differences in tau pathology distribution and coexisting hippocampal sclerosis, which may impact biomarker studies.

Abstract While the accumulation and aggregation of amyloid-β and tau are central events in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease, there is increasing evidence that cerebrovascular pathology is also abundant in Alzheimer’s disease brains. In brain capillaries, endothelial cells are connected closely with one another through transmembrane tight junction proteins forming the blood–brain barrier. Because the blood–brain barrier tightly regulates the exchange of molecules between brain and blood and maintains brain homeostasis, its impairment is increasingly recognized as a critical factor contributing to Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis. However, the pathological relationship between blood–brain barrier properties and Alzheimer’s disease progression in the human brain is not fully understood. In this study, we show that the loss of cortical tight junction proteins is a common event in Alzheimer’s disease, and is correlated with synaptic degeneration. By quantifying the amounts of major tight junction proteins, claudin-5 and occludin, in 12 brain regions dissected from post-mortem brains of normal ageing (n = 10), pathological ageing (n = 14) and Alzheimer’s disease patients (n = 19), we found that they were selectively decreased in cortical areas in Alzheimer’s disease. Cortical tight junction proteins were decreased in association with the Braak neurofibrillary tangle stage. There was also a negative correlation between the amount of tight junction proteins and the amounts of insoluble Alzheimer’s disease-related proteins, in particular amyloid-β40, in cortical areas. In addition, the amount of tight junction proteins in these areas correlated positively with those of synaptic markers. Thus, loss of cortical tight junction proteins in Alzheimer’s disease is associated with insoluble amyloid-β40 and loss of synaptic markers. Importantly, the positive correlation between claudin-5 and synaptic markers, in particular synaptophysin, was present independent of insoluble amyloid-β40, amyloid-β42 and tau values, suggesting that loss of cortical tight junction proteins and synaptic degeneration is present, at least in part, independent of insoluble Alzheimer’s disease-related proteins. Collectively, these results indicate that loss of tight junction proteins occurs predominantly in the neocortex during Alzheimer’s disease progression. Further, our findings provide a neuropathological clue as to how endothelial tight junction pathology may contribute to Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis in both synergistic and additive manners to typical amyloid-β and tau pathologies.